When Schools Hand Out ISS & Detentions: Fair Discipline or Overused Tool?
Walking into school on a Monday morning, you overhear a classmate grumbling about getting weekend detention for forgetting their gym uniform. Another student mentions they’ll spend third period in ISS (In-School Suspension) because their phone buzzed during class. These scenarios might leave you wondering: How often do schools rely on punishments like detention or ISS—and does it actually help students learn from mistakes?
Discipline policies exist to maintain order and teach responsibility, but the line between “structured consequences” and “overly harsh reactions” can blur. Let’s explore why schools use these measures, how consistently they’re applied, and what alternatives might better serve students.
—
The Purpose of ISS & Detentions: Intent vs. Reality
Schools typically frame detentions and ISS as “corrective” tools. The idea is simple: If a student breaks a rule—say, disrupting class or skipping homework—a consequence like staying after school or being isolated during the day encourages reflection and better choices next time.
But here’s the catch: Consistency matters. A policy only works if students perceive it as fair. Imagine two scenarios:
– School A issues detention only for repeated, intentional misbehavior after verbal warnings.
– School B assigns ISS immediately for minor infractions, like chewing gum or whispering.
In School B, students might see punishments as arbitrary or disproportionate, breeding resentment rather than accountability. Worse, frequent ISS can disconnect students from classroom learning, putting them further behind academically.
—
Why Do Some Schools Punish More Casually?
Several factors influence how freely a school hands out detentions or ISS:
1. Pressure to Maintain Control
Overcrowded classrooms, understaffed hallways, or high-stakes testing environments can push teachers and administrators toward “quick fixes.” Removing a disruptive student via ISS might feel like the only way to protect instructional time—even if the punishment doesn’t address the root cause.
2. Vague or Outdated Policies
Some schools lack clear guidelines on what warrants ISS versus a detention or a parent-teacher conference. Without defined tiers of consequences, educators may default to stricter measures to avoid accusations of being “too lenient.”
3. Implicit Bias
Studies suggest that Black students, students with disabilities, and boys are disproportionately disciplined for similar behaviors compared to their peers. Unconscious biases can lead to harsher penalties for certain groups, even when policies appear neutral on paper.
4. Lack of Training
Not all teachers receive coaching on de-escalation techniques or restorative practices. If shouting matches or power struggles erupt, detention slips might replace meaningful dialogue.
—
The Hidden Costs of Over-Punishing
While ISS and detentions seem like straightforward solutions, overuse can backfire:
– Academic Impact: Missing class time for ISS often means missing lessons, quizzes, or group work. Struggling students fall further behind, which can fuel frustration and more behavioral issues.
– Damaged Relationships: Students who feel unfairly targeted may distrust teachers or disengage entirely. One high schooler shared, “I got ISS for having a hoodie on indoors. Now I just avoid that teacher’s class altogether.”
– Normalizing Exclusion: Frequent punishments normalize isolation as a response to conflict. Students miss opportunities to practice conflict resolution or empathy.
—
Alternatives That Foster Growth
Forward-thinking schools are experimenting with strategies that prioritize growth over punishment:
1. Restorative Circles
Instead of ISS, students meet with affected parties to discuss how their actions impacted others and brainstorm ways to repair harm. This builds empathy and problem-solving skills.
2. Behavior Contracts
For recurring issues, teachers and students co-create a plan with achievable goals (e.g., “I’ll raise my hand before speaking three times daily”). Progress is tracked collaboratively.
3. Flexible “Reset” Spaces
Some schools designate calming rooms where students can decompress with mindfulness exercises or counselor support before rejoining class—no disciplinary record attached.
4. Teacher Mentorship
Pairing students with a trusted staff member for weekly check-ins helps address underlying issues like anxiety, family stress, or academic gaps that might trigger misbehavior.
—
What Can Students & Parents Do?
If your school leans heavily on detentions or ISS, consider these steps:
– Review the Handbook: Does the policy clarify which behaviors lead to which consequences? Are there appeal processes?
– Collect Data: Track how often punishments are given, for what reasons, and to whom. Patterns might reveal biases or inconsistencies.
– Advocate for Dialogue: Suggest staff training on restorative practices or propose a student-led committee to review discipline policies.
—
Final Thoughts
Discipline isn’t about control—it’s about guiding young people to become thoughtful, responsible members of a community. While ISS and detentions have their place, relying on them too casually risks prioritizing convenience over growth. By balancing accountability with support, schools can create environments where mistakes become learning opportunities, not just reasons to punish.
The next time you hear about a peer getting detention for a minor misstep, ask yourself: Did that consequence make our school community stronger—or did it just add another layer of disconnect?
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Schools Hand Out ISS & Detentions: Fair Discipline or Overused Tool