When Popularity Becomes Problematic: Navigating Student Activity Favoritism
Walking through the bustling hallways of my school, you’ll notice something peculiar. Certain clubs, teams, and events dominate conversations, bulletin boards, and even faculty attention. A select group of students seem to be everywhere—leading assemblies, starring in performances, or representing the school in competitions. Meanwhile, other activities struggle to fill sign-up sheets or secure funding. This isn’t just about differing interests; it’s a pattern of favoritism that shapes our school culture in ways that leave many students feeling invisible.
Let’s start with the obvious: favoritism isn’t unique to schools. Humans naturally gravitate toward what’s familiar, exciting, or successful. But when this bias becomes systemic, it creates a cycle where only certain students—and their passions—thrive. At my school, the drama club, varsity sports teams, and student council receive disproportionate resources and recognition. Their posters are professionally printed, their events are heavily promoted, and their members are treated like celebrities. Meanwhile, clubs like the science Olympiad team, the environmental awareness group, or the creative writing workshop are relegated to forgotten corners of the campus.
Why does this happen? One reason is visibility. High-energy activities like football games or musicals naturally attract crowds, making them easy to market. Administrators and teachers often prioritize these “showcase” events because they reflect well on the school’s reputation. Parents love them, alumni donate more when they see glossy photos of winning teams, and local media covers them. But this creates a feedback loop: popular activities get more funding, which leads to better results, which justifies even more funding. The less glamorous but equally valuable groups? They’re left to fend for themselves.
Another factor is social dynamics. Students in favored activities often belong to tight-knit cliques that reinforce their dominance. Take the student council, for example. While it’s supposed to represent all students, elections often boil down to popularity contests. The same charismatic students get re-elected year after year, focusing their efforts on organizing dances and pep rallies rather than addressing broader student concerns. This isn’t to say these students aren’t hardworking—many are—but their repeated success limits opportunities for others to step into leadership roles.
The consequences of this imbalance are far-reaching. For students in overlooked groups, the lack of support can feel personal. Maya, a sophomore in the robotics club, shared, “We built a solar-powered model car last semester, but no teachers came to our showcase. Meanwhile, the basketball team got a pep rally for making it to regionals.” This disparity sends a message: only certain achievements matter. Over time, students in niche clubs may lose motivation or quit altogether, depriving the school of diverse perspectives and talents.
Favoritism also affects how students view fairness. When resources flow to the same groups repeatedly, it breeds cynicism. “Why bother joining the debate team if the school only cares about cheerleading?” a senior named Jake remarked. This mindset discourages exploration and risk-taking, key components of personal growth. Schools should be places where students feel empowered to try new things, not where they learn that success depends on aligning with the “right” crowd.
So, what can be done? First, schools need to audit their activity programs objectively. Which groups consistently receive funding, space, or publicity? Are there patterns in participation rates? Administrators could create a rotating spotlight system, ensuring every club gets a chance to present at assemblies or feature in newsletters. This wouldn’t diminish popular activities but would level the playing field.
Second, student leaders and faculty advisors should actively mentor underrepresented groups. If the coding club struggles with attendance, maybe pairing them with a teacher who can help promote their work would make a difference. Encouraging cross-club collaborations could also bridge gaps. Imagine a joint project between the art club and the engineering team to design interactive installations for the school fair—such partnerships could break down silos and spark interest.
Students themselves play a role too. It’s easy to blame the system, but change often starts with small actions. Attending a meeting of a lesser-known club, sharing their events on social media, or simply having conversations about overlooked interests can shift the culture. Even popular students can use their influence to uplift others. Sarah, a cheer captain, recently volunteered at a fundraiser for the school’s community garden. “I realized I’d never given other clubs a chance,” she said. “Now I’m advocating for them in council meetings.”
Parents and the wider community shouldn’t be left out. Schools often cater to what they think parents want to see. If more families attend chess tournaments or poetry slams, it signals that diverse achievements are valued. Community partnerships could also provide resources—local businesses might sponsor a robotics competition or an environmental clean-up day.
Ultimately, addressing favoritism isn’t about taking away opportunities from successful groups. It’s about expanding the definition of success. A school’s strength lies in its diversity—of ideas, talents, and passions. When only a few activities dominate, everyone loses. The star athlete might never discover a love for painting. The future scientist might quit because her lab lacks equipment. The quiet writer might never share stories that could inspire peers.
Breaking this cycle requires intentionality. It means celebrating the football team’s victory and the debate team’s persuasive arguments with equal enthusiasm. It means giving the jazz band and the mathletes the same stage. Most importantly, it means reminding every student that their interests matter—not because they’re popular, but because they’re part of what makes the school community whole.
As my school grapples with these issues, I’ve seen glimmers of hope. Last month, the photography club collaborated with the yearbook committee to document a lesser-known cultural festival organized by the international students’ association. The event drew a surprising crowd, and for the first time, the participants felt seen. Small steps like these prove that change is possible—one activity, one student, and one conversation at a time.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Popularity Becomes Problematic: Navigating Student Activity Favoritism