When Helping My Family Learn Exposed Flaws in Our Tech Tools
My youngest cousin, Maya, was diagnosed with dyslexia at age eight. When our family tried to support her, we quickly realized that the apps and platforms marketed as “innovative learning tools” weren’t built for kids like her. Text-heavy interfaces, rigid instructions, and a one-size-fits-all approach left her frustrated—and exposed a problem I hadn’t noticed before: Most edtech tools overlook learners who don’t fit the “typical” mold.
This realization didn’t come from my work as a volunteer tutor or my graduate studies in education. It came from watching my family navigate a system that failed to adapt to their needs. Here’s what our journey taught me about the gaps in learning technology—and why closing them matters for everyone.
—
The Myth of “User-Friendly” Design
When Maya struggled with reading, we turned to popular literacy apps recommended by her school. But the apps assumed all users could easily follow written prompts or process auditory instructions quickly. For Maya, who needed visual cues and adjustable pacing, these features created barriers instead of bridges.
One app, for example, used a cheerful voice to say, “Tap the word that rhymes with cat!” But if Maya didn’t process the instruction in time, the app moved on, leaving her confused. There was no option to slow down the narration or display a text version of the prompt. Tools praised for their “simplicity” often lacked basic customization—like adjusting speed, font styles, or response times—that could make them accessible to neurodiverse learners.
This isn’t just about dyslexia. My aunt, who immigrated to the U.S. as an adult, faced similar hurdles. Language-learning apps bombarded her with grammar rules before she’d mastered basic vocabulary. Without translations in her native language or culturally relevant examples, she felt alienated. “I’m not smart enough for this,” she’d say—a heartbreaking admission from someone navigating two jobs and parenting.
—
Why Flexibility Isn’t a “Nice-to-Have”
Most edtech tools are designed for the “average” student, a concept that’s flawed from the start. Learners vary in abilities, backgrounds, and circumstances. A single parent studying late at night needs bite-sized lessons; a child in a noisy home might need captions for video tutorials. Yet many platforms treat customization as an afterthought—if they include it at all.
Research backs this up. A 2022 study found that 60% of K-12 teachers reported their edtech tools weren’t effective for students with learning differences. Meanwhile, adult learners in low-income communities often abandon apps they find inflexible or culturally mismatched.
The irony? Building adaptable tools isn’t just ethically right—it’s practical. For instance, when Maya used a math app that let her choose between text, audio, or video explanations, her confidence soared. Simple tweaks, like letting users adjust colors for better readability or replay instructions without penalty, can transform a tool from exclusionary to empowering.
—
The Human Cost of Overlooked Needs
My family’s struggles aren’t unique. During my volunteer work, I met a high schooler named Javier, who hid his reading difficulties by memorizing audiobook narrations. He’d stay up until 2 a.m. trying to “hack” his way through assignments because his school’s software didn’t support text-to-speech. His story, like Maya’s, underscores a harsh truth: When technology isn’t designed with diverse users in mind, it reinforces inequality.
Adults aren’t spared either. My uncle, a construction worker taking night classes, couldn’t figure out why his online course kept logging him out mid-lesson. Turns out, the platform automatically signed users off after 10 minutes of inactivity—a problem for someone juggling assignments during work breaks. Small design choices, invisible to some, become roadblocks for others.
—
How We Can Build Better Tools
The solution isn’t to scrap existing technology but to rethink how we design it. Here’s where we can start:
1. Prioritize User Feedback Early
Involve diverse learners—kids with disabilities, non-native speakers, busy parents—in the testing phase. Ask not just “Does this work?” but “Does this work for you?”
2. Embrace Modular Design
Let users adjust settings like font size, language, or response times without needing a Ph.D. in tech. Think of it like a car seat: Easy to customize because people aren’t all the same height.
3. Normalize “Slow Learning”
Not everyone thrives under timed quizzes or rapid-fire lessons. Tools should reward progress, not speed.
4. Bridge the Cultural Gap
Include examples, accents, and scenarios that reflect diverse lived experiences. A math problem about splitting restaurant bills won’t resonate with a child who’s never dined out.
—
A Call to Action—Beyond My Family
Watching Maya flourish with the right tools showed me what’s possible. She’s now using an app that lets her highlight text to hear it read aloud, adjust background colors, and practice skills through games instead of drills. Her progress isn’t just academic; she’s regained the joy of learning.
But these success stories shouldn’t depend on luck or privilege. As someone who’s seen both sides—the frustration of inadequate tools and the relief of finding good ones—I believe the edtech industry has a responsibility to innovate inclusively. After all, learning isn’t a privilege for the “typical” student. It’s a right for everyone.
The next time you design an app, review a product, or advocate for educational resources, ask yourself: Who might this leave behind? The answer could change a life.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Helping My Family Learn Exposed Flaws in Our Tech Tools