When Fundraising Feels Forced: A Student’s Perspective on School Donation Policies
Every Friday at my high school, there’s a tradition called “Casual Day.” Instead of uniforms, students wear regular clothes—but only if they donate $5 to a school fundraiser. At first, this seemed harmless. After all, who doesn’t want to swap a stiff blazer for jeans once a week? But over time, something about the policy started to feel off. Students who chose not to participate—whether due to financial constraints, personal beliefs, or simply forgetting their cash—were still pressured to donate. Teachers reminded us daily, donation jars appeared in classrooms, and announcements framed giving as a “moral duty.” For a school with manicured sports fields, state-of-the-art labs, and alumni who donate millions, this aggressive approach to fundraising felt less like community building and more like hypocrisy.
Here’s why mandatory donation culture in well-funded schools misses the mark—and what institutions could do instead.
—
The Problem with “Obligatory Generosity”
Fundraisers are common in schools, but they’re usually tied to specific goals: new library books, field trips, or charity drives. At my school, however, the purpose of Casual Day donations was vague. When students asked where the money went, answers ranged from “general improvements” to “supporting underprivileged schools”—a noble cause, but one that raised eyebrows. If our institution already had ample resources, why were we being asked to fix systemic inequities? Worse, the framing felt manipulative. By linking donations to Casual Day participation, the school created a visible divide: those who paid could relax in their own clothes, while others stuck out in uniforms. It wasn’t just about money; it was about social pressure.
This approach contradicts what fundraising should teach. Volunteering and giving are meant to stem from empathy, not guilt or fear of exclusion. When schools force “generosity,” they risk fostering resentment—not civic-mindedness. As one classmate put it: “If they actually cared about helping others, they’d let us choose how to contribute. This just feels like a cash grab.”
—
Why Wealthy Schools Get It Wrong
Private and well-funded public schools often have complex relationships with money. While they may rely on tuition or taxes, many also host galas, auctions, and alumni networks that bring in significant revenue. So why pressure students for an extra $5? The answer often lies in tradition, optics, or a misguided attempt to teach “responsibility.”
But there’s a disconnect. At my school, teachers emphasized that “every small contribution adds up,” yet students knew the math didn’t justify the emotional toll. If 1,000 students donated $5 weekly, the school would collect $20,000 monthly—a fraction of its operating budget. Meanwhile, families struggling to afford tuition fees or extracurriculars felt alienated by the constant requests. The message became clear: Even if you’re stretched thin, you’re expected to prioritize the school’s image over your own needs.
This creates a paradox. Schools with resources preach inclusivity and empathy in theory but practice exclusivity in their policies. A student who can’t afford Casual Day isn’t just missing out on comfy clothes; they’re labeled as “not doing their part.”
—
The Bigger Lesson Students Are Learning
Mandatory donations don’t just affect wallets; they shape how young people view charity. When giving feels compulsory, it becomes transactional—a box to check rather than a value to embrace. I noticed peers treating Casual Day as a “tax” to avoid awkwardness, not as a chance to make a difference. Others resented the school for conflating school spirit with financial compliance.
Worse, these policies can perpetuate inequality within the student body. At a school where some families vacation overseas while others rely on scholarships, forced donations highlight economic divides. As one scholarship student told me: “I already feel like I don’t belong here. Now I have to prove I’m ‘grateful’ by paying for the privilege?”
Schools aiming to build community should ask: Are we teaching students to care about causes—or just about following rules?
—
A Better Approach to School Fundraising
The good news? There are ways to encourage giving without the guilt. Here’s what educators could consider:
1. Transparency: Specify where funds go. If donations support a food bank, share photos of deliveries. If they buy classroom supplies, let students vote on items. Concrete goals make contributions feel meaningful.
2. Voluntary Participation: Offer multiple ways to get involved. Could students volunteer time instead of money? Could they design fundraising ideas? Forcing one-size-fits-all giving ignores diverse circumstances.
3. No-Stigma Policies: Remove public shaming. Instead of announcing who didn’t donate, celebrate those who did—without comparisons. A simple “Thank you to everyone who contributed!” avoids alienating others.
4. Teach Financial Literacy: Use fundraisers as a chance to discuss budgeting, philanthropy, and ethical spending. Why do some causes matter more than others? How much should one give? These conversations empower students to make informed choices.
—
Final Thoughts: Rethinking ‘Community’ in Schools
Schools are more than academic hubs—they’re spaces where young people learn how to navigate societal norms. When fundraising feels unfair, it’s not just about the money; it’s about the underlying values being promoted.
My school’s Casual Day policy could have been a chance to foster genuine altruism. Instead, it became a symbol of thoughtless tradition. The fix isn’t complicated: treat students as partners, not ATMs. Trust them to care about their community when given autonomy—and watch the hypocrisy fade.
After all, generosity shouldn’t be a dress code.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Fundraising Feels Forced: A Student’s Perspective on School Donation Policies