When Detentions Become Routine: Examining School Discipline Practices
Walking into a high school cafeteria during lunch, you’ll likely overhear students swapping stories about their latest run-ins with authority. “I got ISS for forgetting my ID badge,” one mutters. “Three days of detention because my phone vibrated in class,” another groans. While discipline is a necessary part of maintaining order, many schools are facing growing criticism for relying too heavily on punitive measures like in-school suspension (ISS) or after-school detentions—often for minor infractions. But how casually do schools really hand out these consequences, and what does it mean for students?
The Gray Area of School Discipline Policies
Most schools have written codes of conduct outlining rules and consequences, but enforcement often varies wildly. A student in one district might receive a warning for wearing a hoodie in class, while another gets an automatic detention for the same “violation.” This inconsistency stems from factors like administrative pressure to maintain strict environments, teacher burnout, or vague policy language that leaves room for interpretation.
For example, a middle school in Ohio reported issuing over 500 detentions in a single semester—mostly for tardiness or “disruptive behavior”—while a similarly sized school in California focused on restorative conversations for first-time offenders. The difference? Leadership philosophy. Schools prioritizing punishment over problem-solving tend to default to ISS or detentions as a quick fix, even when the misstep doesn’t warrant it.
The Hidden Costs of Over-Policing Classrooms
Frequent use of punitive discipline creates ripple effects. Research shows that students repeatedly subjected to ISS or detentions for minor issues—like dress code violations or talking during lessons—often disengage academically. “It feels like they’re trying to catch you doing something wrong instead of helping you do right,” says Marcus, a 10th grader from Texas who served six ISS sessions for uniform violations.
Teachers also feel the strain. Mandating detentions for every small infraction burns out educators who’d rather focus on teaching than policing. Ms. Rivera, a middle school science teacher in Florida, admits: “I’ve given detentions for students chewing gum because our principal insists on ‘zero tolerance.’ But it damages my relationship with the kids. They see me as an enforcer, not a mentor.”
Worse, over-reliance on punishments disproportionately impacts marginalized groups. Data from the U.S. Department of Education reveals that Black students and students with disabilities are 2–3 times more likely to receive suspensions than their peers for similar behaviors. This perpetuates inequities and fuels the school-to-prison pipeline.
Why Schools Default to Punishments (Even When They Shouldn’t)
Schools aren’t inherently “out to get” students, but many face systemic pressures that make detention rooms an easy outlet:
1. Understaffing: Overworked administrators may lack time to address root causes of misbehavior.
2. Fear of Liability: Teachers sometimes opt for harsh consequences to avoid accusations of leniency.
3. Performance Metrics: Schools in high-stakes testing environments often prioritize compliance over social-emotional growth.
4. Parent Expectations: Some communities equate strict discipline with “good schooling,” pressuring staff to penalize minor issues.
As a result, detention becomes a Band-Aid solution. A 7th grader doodling in their notebook during a lecture might need redirection, not isolation. Yet, without training in conflict resolution or classroom management strategies, educators default to what’s familiar: write-ups and timeouts.
Rethinking Discipline: What Works Better Than Detentions?
Forward-thinking schools are shifting toward restorative practices that repair harm instead of merely penalizing it. At a Minnesota high school, students who disrupt class now attend peer mediation sessions to discuss how their actions affect others. “It’s harder than sitting in ISS,” admits one participant, “but you actually learn from it.”
Other effective alternatives include:
– Community Service Projects: Cleaning school gardens or organizing library books fosters responsibility.
– Skill-Building Workshops: Teaching stress management or organizational skills addresses underlying issues.
– Flexible Deadlines: Reducing academic pressure can prevent acting-out behaviors.
Even small changes matter. One Colorado elementary school replaced “silent lunch” detentions with lunchtime mentorship circles, where students discuss conflicts with staff. Referrals dropped by 40% in one year.
How to Advocate for Fairer Discipline in Your School
If your school’s discipline system feels overly harsh or arbitrary, here’s how to spark change:
1. Review the Policy: Many schools publicly post handbooks—check if consequences align with listed violations.
2. Collect Stories: Survey students/parents about their experiences with ISS or detentions. Data speaks louder than opinions.
3. Suggest Training: Encourage staff development in trauma-informed teaching or restorative justice.
4. Collaborate, Don’t Accuse: Frame concerns as a shared effort to support student success.
Discipline should teach—not just punish. While detentions and ISS have their place for severe issues, their overuse risks turning schools into compliance factories rather than communities of growth. By balancing accountability with empathy, educators can create environments where mistakes become learning opportunities, not just reasons for isolation.
The next time you hear about a classmate getting detention for a questionable reason, ask: Could this have been handled differently? Sometimes, changing the conversation starts with a single question.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Detentions Become Routine: Examining School Discipline Practices