The Reading Crisis in American High Schools: How Outdated Teaching Methods Fail Students
When we send our children to school, we trust that the system will equip them with foundational skills—especially the ability to read. But what happens when widely adopted teaching methods don’t work? Over the past two decades, literacy instruction in the U.S. has been shaped by approaches like Lucy Calkins’ “balanced literacy” model, which emphasizes creativity and student-led learning over structured phonics instruction. While this method gained popularity for its child-centered philosophy, mounting evidence suggests it has left countless students unprepared.
So how many high school seniors graduate without functional literacy? While exact percentages are debated, data from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reveals a troubling pattern: approximately 19% of U.S. high school graduates struggle to read at a basic level, meaning they cannot reliably interpret texts like job applications, news articles, or medical instructions. In some states, that number climbs to nearly 30%. Critics argue that flawed instructional models—like Calkins’—have directly contributed to this crisis.
The Rise of Balanced Literacy and Its Flaws
Lucy Calkins, a professor at Columbia University’s Teachers College, became a household name in education circles with her “Units of Study” curriculum. Her approach, rooted in the idea that children naturally gravitate toward reading if given engaging stories and minimal direct instruction, downplays systematic phonics (the relationship between letters and sounds). Instead, students are encouraged to guess unfamiliar words using context clues or pictures—a strategy critics compare to “teaching kids to swim without showing them how to float.”
This philosophy aligned with the “whole language” movement of the 1990s, which dismissed phonics as tedious and outdated. But decades of cognitive science research contradict this view. Studies show that explicit, sequential phonics instruction is critical for building decoding skills, especially for struggling readers. Without it, students often memorize words superficially or develop compensatory habits that collapse when faced with complex texts.
The Consequences of Poor Literacy Instruction
Functional illiteracy isn’t just about stumbling over Shakespeare or advanced textbooks. It’s about navigating daily life. Adults with limited reading skills face higher unemployment rates, lower earnings, and increased vulnerability to scams or misinformation. For high school graduates, the stakes are immediate: college remediation courses, limited career options, and social stigma.
Take Mississippi, a state that overhauled its reading curriculum in 2013 to prioritize phonics-based instruction. By 2022, its fourth-grade reading scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) jumped from 49th to 21st in the nation. Meanwhile, states doubling down on balanced literacy, like New York and California, saw stagnant or declining scores. In New York City, where Calkins’ methods dominated classrooms for years, nearly half of third graders failed to meet reading proficiency standards in 2023.
Why Has This Method Persisted?
Calkins’ approach thrived because it felt right. Teachers loved its emphasis on creativity and autonomy; parents appreciated classrooms buzzing with “book clubs” and colorful journals. But beneath the surface, students lacking foundational skills were slipping through the cracks.
The curriculum also lacked accountability. Schools often measured success by how many books a child finished—not by how well they understood them. As one parent lamented in a New York Times investigation, “My daughter could ‘read’ a chapter book in first grade but couldn’t decode simple words like ‘chicken’ or ‘phone.’ She’d just memorized the stories.”
A Shift in the Tide
Awareness of the reading crisis is growing. In 2022, Calkins’ Teachers College announced updates to its curriculum, adding more phonics and decodable texts—a tacit admission that earlier versions were incomplete. States like Colorado and Arkansas have passed laws requiring schools to adopt evidence-based literacy practices. Even popular media has joined the conversation, with podcasts like Sold a Story exposing how flawed theories became classroom gospel.
What Can Parents and Educators Do?
1. Advocate for Science-Based Instruction: Push schools to adopt programs that blend phonics with comprehension strategies. Resources like the Reading League offer guidance on effective curricula.
2. Screen Early: Literacy gaps emerge as early as kindergarten. Regular assessments can identify struggling readers before they fall irreparably behind.
3. Support Teachers: Many educators want to ditch outdated methods but lack training or resources. Professional development and mentorship are key.
The Bottom Line
The question isn’t just “how many students can’t read?”—it’s “how many lives have been derailed by avoidable failures?” While Lucy Calkins’ intentions may have been noble, her methods overlooked a critical truth: Reading isn’t a natural skill like walking or talking. It requires deliberate, structured teaching.
As schools reckon with the legacy of balanced literacy, the path forward is clear: Listen to the science, empower teachers with better tools, and ensure every child leaves high school not just with a diploma, but with the ability to read it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Reading Crisis in American High Schools: How Outdated Teaching Methods Fail Students