The Most Dreaded Required Reads: Why Some Books Just Don’t Click
We’ve all been there: staring at a syllabus or summer reading list, only to groan at the sight of a title that feels about as exciting as watching paint dry. Required reading is a staple of education, designed to broaden perspectives and spark critical thinking. But let’s be honest—not every classic or curriculum-mandated book lands well with students. Some feel painfully outdated, others drown in dense prose, and a few leave readers wondering, Why is this even here? Let’s unpack the books that consistently top “worst required reading” lists and explore why they struggle to resonate.
The Usual Suspects: Books That Spark Universal Eye-Rolls
Ask a room of students or adults about their least favorite required reads, and you’ll hear the same titles repeated like a broken record. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter often tops the list. While its themes of shame and societal judgment are timeless, many argue that its slow-paced, symbolism-heavy narrative feels like wading through molasses. One high schooler put it bluntly: “I get that Hester’s struggles matter, but 200 pages of Puritan guilt? There’s gotta be a better way to teach symbolism.”
Then there’s J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye. Once hailed as a revolutionary take on teenage angst, Holden Caulfield’s cynical monologues now strike some readers as whiny rather than relatable. “I kept waiting for him to do something besides complain,” said a college freshman. “It’s like being trapped in a conversation with that friend who hates everything but never offers solutions.”
Even F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, a glittering critique of the American Dream, isn’t immune to criticism. While its lavish parties and tragic romance captivate many, others find Jay Gatsby’s obsession with Daisy underwhelming. “Rich people problems,” shrugged one reader. “It’s hard to care about characters who have everything but still make terrible choices.”
Why Do These Books Miss the Mark?
The disconnect often boils down to three factors: relevance, accessibility, and teaching methods.
1. Relevance
Many classics were written in eras with vastly different social norms, making it tough for modern readers to connect. Take The Scarlet Letter again—its exploration of public shaming is fascinating, but the Puritan setting feels alien to students navigating TikTok dramas and climate anxiety. Without context, the story’s emotional weight gets lost in translation.
2. Accessibility
Older books often use language that feels archaic or overly complex. Herman Melville’s Moby-Dick, for instance, spends chapters dissecting 19th-century whaling logistics. While scholars praise its depth, the average teenager sees a 600-page doorstopper filled with tangents about rope knots. As one teacher admitted, “Even I skip the cetology chapters when re-reading it.”
3. Teaching Approach
Sometimes, the book isn’t the problem—it’s how it’s taught. A rushed curriculum might reduce a nuanced novel to a checklist of themes and vocabulary words. For example, Lord of the Flies becomes less about human nature and more about memorizing allegories. “We spent so much time analyzing ‘the conch = democracy’ that we never discussed why the boys turned savage,” recalled a student.
Could There Be a Better Way?
Criticizing required reading isn’t about dismissing classics—it’s about asking whether they’re the best tools for fostering a love of literature. Here’s where educators and students are reimagining the canon:
1. Pair Classics with Modern Voices
Why not contrast The Great Gatsby with a contemporary novel about wealth inequality, like Crazy Rich Asians or The Vanishing Half? Comparing Gatsby’s extravagance to modern excess could make themes feel urgent.
2. Offer Choices Within Themes
Instead of mandating one book about identity, let students pick from a list—Persepolis (a graphic novel), The Hate U Give (YA fiction), or Between the World and Me (nonfiction). Choice empowers engagement.
3. Focus on Why the Book Matters
Before diving into 1984, discuss how surveillance and misinformation shape our world today. Linking Orwell’s dystopia to social media algorithms or AI ethics can make the story feel vital, not dusty.
The Takeaway: Required Reading Isn’t Broken—It Just Needs Tweaking
The “worst” books often reveal gaps in how we frame them. Moby-Dick might thrive in a marine biology class, while The Catcher in the Rye could resonate more if taught alongside mental health discussions. The goal shouldn’t be to scrap challenging texts but to present them in ways that highlight their relevance.
Next time you encounter a dreaded required read, ask yourself: What’s the bigger idea here? Maybe the book isn’t the villain—it’s just waiting for the right context to shine. After all, even the most tedious classic has something to say… if we’re willing to listen creatively.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Most Dreaded Required Reads: Why Some Books Just Don’t Click