The Literacy Crisis in American High Schools: Examining the Impact of Reading Instruction Methods
For decades, debates about how to teach children to read have divided educators, policymakers, and parents. One prominent figure in this conversation is Lucy Calkins, an education professor and founder of the Teachers College Reading and Writing Project at Columbia University. Her “balanced literacy” approach, which emphasizes student choice, exposure to literature, and minimal direct phonics instruction, has been widely adopted in U.S. schools since the 1990s. However, mounting evidence suggests that this method has left a troubling percentage of high school seniors functionally illiterate—unable to read at a basic level required for daily life.
What Does “Functionally Illiterate” Mean?
Functional illiteracy refers to the inability to read well enough to perform routine tasks like understanding medication labels, filling out job applications, or interpreting bus schedules. According to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), approximately 19% of U.S. high school graduates fall into this category. While not all of these cases can be directly attributed to specific teaching methods, researchers have identified systemic flaws in reading instruction that contribute to the problem.
The Lucy Calkins Controversy
Calkins’ approach, often called “whole language” or “balanced literacy,” encourages children to guess unfamiliar words using context clues or pictures rather than systematically decoding letter sounds. For example, a child might be taught to look at the first letter of a word and then guess based on the story’s theme—a strategy critics argue undermines foundational reading skills. Phonics, the practice of connecting sounds to letters, is either minimized or taught inconsistently in these classrooms.
This method gained popularity for its child-centered philosophy, but neuroscience and literacy studies have repeatedly shown that explicit phonics instruction is critical for most students to become proficient readers. A 2019 report by the National Council on Teacher Quality found that 40% of teacher-preparation programs still emphasize balanced literacy over phonics-based methods, despite decades of evidence highlighting its shortcomings.
The Consequences of Inadequate Instruction
So how many students reach graduation without basic literacy? While exact figures linking Calkins’ methods to illiteracy rates are challenging to isolate, data paints a grim picture:
– National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP): Only 37% of U.S. 12th graders scored “proficient” in reading in 2019.
– Economic Impact: A 2020 study estimated that low literacy costs the U.S. economy over $225 billion annually in lost productivity and crime.
– Long-Term Outcomes: Functionally illiterate adults are more likely to experience unemployment, poverty, and health disparities.
Parents and educators have shared heartbreaking anecdotes. One high school teacher in Ohio described students who could not read simple instructions on standardized tests. A mother in California recounted her 17-year-old son struggling to read a restaurant menu after years in a balanced literacy-focused district. These stories align with research showing that students who don’t master phonics early often never catch up.
Why Has This Approach Persisted?
Calkins’ methods became entrenched in schools due to a perfect storm of factors:
1. Philosophical Appeal: The idea that children can “naturally” discover reading through immersion in literature resonates with educators who prioritize creativity over rote learning.
2. Commercial Influence: Publishing companies profit from selling balanced literacy curricula, workbooks, and training programs.
3. Teacher Training Gaps: Many educators aren’t taught the science of reading in their credential programs, leaving them unprepared to teach struggling readers.
However, the tide is turning. Mississippi, once ranked last in education, overhauled its reading instruction to focus on phonics and saw its fourth-grade reading scores jump from 49th to 21st nationally between 2013 and 2019. New York City, a longtime adopter of Calkins’ methods, announced in 2022 that it would phase out her curriculum in favor of evidence-based approaches.
A Path Forward
The solution isn’t simply to blame one curriculum but to address systemic failures:
– Teacher Training: Schools must prioritize professional development in phonics and structured literacy.
– Parent Advocacy: Families should demand transparency about reading curricula and support early screening for dyslexia.
– Policy Changes: States need to align reading standards with scientific research, as seen in Arkansas and Florida’s recent literacy laws.
Lucy Calkins herself has begun revising her materials to include more phonics, acknowledging that “the pendulum may have swung too far” away from decoding skills. While this is a step in the right direction, it doesn’t undo the damage for students already left behind.
Conclusion
The question isn’t just “what percentage of high school seniors can’t read?” but “how many lives have been derailed by flawed teaching methods?” While estimates vary, even a 5% illiteracy rate represents millions of young adults unprepared for adulthood. The focus must shift from defending outdated ideologies to embracing proven strategies that empower every child to read. As communities nationwide reckon with pandemic-related learning loss, fixing reading instruction isn’t just an educational priority—it’s a moral imperative.
The good news? We know how to solve this problem. Science-backed reading methods exist; now it’s time to ensure every classroom uses them.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Literacy Crisis in American High Schools: Examining the Impact of Reading Instruction Methods