The Kamehameha Schools: A Hawaiian Legacy Under Legal Fire
Imagine a school founded not just to educate, but to heal. A school born from the deep grief of a Hawaiian princess witnessing the near-erasure of her people and their culture. A school designed explicitly to uplift Native Hawaiian children through education deeply rooted in their heritage and connection to the land. That school is Kamehameha Schools, and it stands alone in the world as the only private K-12 institution reserved solely for those of Native Hawaiian ancestry. Yet, today, this unique and vital institution finds itself in the crosshairs of a legal challenge from the very organization that successfully dismantled race-conscious college admissions nationwide.
Kamehameha’s story begins with a profound act of foresight and aloha (love). Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop, the last direct descendant of King Kamehameha I, witnessed firsthand the devastating impacts of Western contact and colonization on her people – loss of land (`āina`), suppression of language (`ʻōlelo Hawaiʻi`), and plummeting population. Determined to secure a future for Native Hawaiians, she dedicated her vast estate upon her death in 1884 to creating schools specifically for children “of Hawaiian blood.” Her vision was clear: education was the key to Hawaiian survival and resurgence.
For over 140 years, Kamehameha Schools has fulfilled Pauahi’s sacred trust. It operates three sprawling campuses on Oʻahu, Maui, and Hawaiʻi Island, alongside numerous preschools and community outreach programs. Its mission transcends standard academics. While providing rigorous college preparatory education, Kamehameha immerses students in Hawaiian language, history, culture (`moʻomeheu`), arts, and values like kuleana (responsibility) and mālama ʻāina (caring for the land). It’s about creating confident, culturally grounded leaders who understand their identity and their kuleana to their lāhui (nation/people). For generations of Native Hawaiians, Kamehameha has been a beacon, a place where their heritage isn’t just studied but lived and celebrated.
This unique status – serving only those of Native Hawaiian ancestry – is fundamental to its mission. It’s not merely a preference; it’s the core purpose defined by Pauahi’s will and upheld by the Bishop Estate trustees. The need remains stark. Native Hawaiians continue to face significant socioeconomic disparities, lower educational attainment rates, health challenges, and the ongoing struggle to reclaim and preserve their culture in the face of historical trauma and ongoing pressures. Kamehameha represents a form of educational sovereignty and reparative justice, a deliberate effort to counter centuries of marginalization specifically targeted at Native Hawaiians.
However, this defining characteristic is now labeled as “discrimination” by Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), the non-profit organization led by Edward Blum that successfully challenged affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina in the landmark Supreme Court case Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023). Riding the wave of that victory, SFFA has filed a federal lawsuit against Kamehameha Schools.
SFFA’s argument hinges on Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guarantees all persons the right to make and enforce contracts “as is enjoyed by white citizens.” They claim Kamehameha’s admissions policy violates this by excluding non-Hawaiian students solely based on ancestry or race. They characterize it as racial discrimination, drawing parallels to the affirmative action programs they successfully dismantled.
This legal attack sends shockwaves through Hawaiʻi and beyond. The comparison to affirmative action, however, misses critical context. Affirmative action programs in higher education were tools designed to promote diversity and inclusion within majority-dominated institutions. Kamehameha Schools is fundamentally different. It was not created to integrate Native Hawaiians into a majority system; it was created by Native Hawaiians, for Native Hawaiians, as a specific remedy for the unique historical and ongoing injustices suffered by this distinct indigenous group. Its purpose is cultural preservation and the targeted uplift of a population identified in Pauahi’s will and recognized as having distinct rights and needs.
Kamehameha has successfully defended its admissions policy before. In the 2007 case Doe v. Kamehameha Schools, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (en banc) upheld the policy, recognizing its unique context rooted in the Hawaiian kingdom’s history, the intent of Pauahi’s will, and the significant disadvantages faced by Native Hawaiians. The court acknowledged this as a legally permissible “remedial” policy tied to a specific group’s history, distinct from general racial classifications.
SFFA, however, believes the legal landscape has shifted significantly since 2007, particularly with the Harvard decision challenging the use of race in admissions. They argue that Kamehameha’s policy cannot withstand this new scrutiny. The outcome of this new lawsuit is far from certain, but the stakes couldn’t be higher.
If SFFA prevails, the very foundation of Kamehameha Schools could crumble. Forcing the institution to admit non-Hawaiian students would directly contradict Pauahi Bishop’s explicit will and fundamentally alter its mission. It would dismantle a crucial sanctuary for Hawaiian cultural learning and identity formation, potentially diluting the targeted support meant to address specific historical and contemporary inequities faced by Native Hawaiians.
Beyond the campuses in Hawaiʻi, the case has profound implications. It represents a direct challenge to the rights of indigenous groups to establish and maintain their own educational and cultural institutions. A ruling against Kamehameha could set a precedent threatening similar schools and programs serving Native American tribes and Alaska Natives across the United States, undermining efforts at self-determination and cultural revitalization.
The halls of Kamehameha Schools resonate with the chants (`oli`) of ancestors and the aspirations of future generations. It stands as a powerful testament to Princess Pauahi Bishop’s enduring vision and the resilience of the Hawaiian people. The legal challenge mounted by SFFA isn’t just about an admissions policy; it’s a battle over identity, history, and the right of an indigenous people to determine their own educational destiny. As the case unfolds, the world watches to see whether this unique Hawaiian legacy will be preserved or become another casualty in a broader campaign against policies designed to address historical and systemic inequities. The future of a people’s connection to their past and their path forward hangs in the balance.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Kamehameha Schools: A Hawaiian Legacy Under Legal Fire