The Invisible Default: Why Christianity Often Masquerades as “Religion” Globally
Imagine walking into a bookstore and asking for “religious literature.” In many parts of the world, you’ll likely be directed to Bibles, Christian devotionals, or theological analyses of the Trinity—not the Bhagavad Gita, Quran, or Buddhist sutras. This isn’t an accident. Across cultures, media, and even academic spaces, Christianity frequently operates as the unspoken template for what “religion” means—a phenomenon that raises critical questions about cultural power dynamics and linguistic shortcuts.
The Linguistic Lens: How Language Shapes Perception
Language doesn’t just describe reality; it actively constructs it. When institutions use “religion” as shorthand for Christianity—whether in school curricula, interfaith dialogues, or public policy discussions—they reinforce an invisible hierarchy. Consider the Pew Research Center’s finding that 84% of U.S. school districts with world religion units spend disproportionate time on Christianity compared to Islam, Hinduism, or indigenous traditions. This imbalance trains young minds to view Christianity as the “main character” in humanity’s spiritual story, with other faiths reduced to footnotes.
This linguistic flattening has tangible consequences. A 2022 study by Cambridge University revealed that 63% of non-Christian respondents in majority-Christian nations felt excluded from civic discussions about “religious values.” As one Hindu interviewee in Texas noted, “When politicians talk about protecting religious freedom, they’re usually defending nativity scenes in courthouses, not my right to wear a bindi at work.”
Historical Roots of the Christian Default
The equation of Christianity with religion didn’t emerge from thin air. European colonial empires systematically framed indigenous spiritual practices as “superstitions” or “mythology” while positioning Christianity as the only “true” religion. Spanish conquistadors burned Mayan codices as “pagan nonsense” while building cathedrals over Aztec temples. British missionaries in Africa taught that ancestral veneration was “devil worship,” positioning the Bible as the singular path to salvation.
This colonial hangover persists in modern academia. Early anthropology departments—funded by missionary groups—often studied non-Christian traditions through a “primitive religion” framework. Even today, many comparative religion textbooks devote entire chapters to Christian denominational splits (Protestant vs. Catholic) while compressing thousands of years of Dharmic traditions into a single “Eastern religions” section.
The Media’s Amplification Effect
Modern media accelerates this bias. When Western news outlets cover “religious” holidays, Easter and Christmas receive lavish cultural coverage, while Diwali or Eid are often relegated to “ethnic interest” pieces. Film and TV frequently use Christian imagery (crosses, church weddings, priest characters) as universal symbols of spirituality. A USC Annenberg study found that 78% of Oscar-winning films with “religious themes” centered on Christianity, despite over 60% of the global population identifying with other faiths or no faith.
This skewed representation shapes public policy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several European governments initially banned communal Muslim prayers while allowing socially distanced Christian services—a double standard framed as “balancing public health and religious needs.” Such decisions reveal how Christianity becomes the measuring stick for what counts as “legitimate” religious practice.
Breaking the Default: Toward Pluralistic Frameworks
Challenging this paradigm requires conscious effort. Educators are adopting “religio-scapes”—a model that maps spiritual traditions without hierarchical positioning—in classrooms from Toronto to Mumbai. Tech companies like Meta have updated content algorithms to stop flagging non-Christian head coverings as “culturally suspicious” while approving Christian veils like nuns’ habits.
Grassroots movements are also making waves. The NotTheDefault campaign by interfaith youth groups pressures publishers to stop using stock photos of churches for generic “religion” articles. In Brazil, Afro-Brazilian Umbanda leaders successfully lobbied for census categories that distinguish their traditions from “miscellaneous folk beliefs.”
The Ripple Effects of Redefining “Religion”
Embracing a truly pluralistic understanding of religion isn’t just about fairness—it’s a practical necessity in our interconnected world. When medical professionals understand that not all patients find comfort in Christian chaplains, hospitals improve care outcomes. When urban planners consider Hindu cremation rituals or Muslim burial timelines, cities design better public spaces. A 2023 UN report showed that regions incorporating multi-religious perspectives into climate policies saw higher community engagement in sustainability projects.
This shift also enriches cultural creativity. K-pop artists like BTS incorporating Buddhist mindfulness concepts, or Marvel’s “Ms. Marvel” series exploring Pakistani Muslim identity, demonstrate how moving beyond the Christian default leads to fresher, more inclusive storytelling.
A Question of Visibility
The pattern is clear: treating Christianity as synonymous with “religion” isn’t neutral—it’s an artifact of historical dominance that continues shaping modern life. As globalization connects disparate communities, re-examining this linguistic habit becomes crucial. Whether through education reforms, media representation, or simply pausing to ask “Which religion do we mean?” in conversations, small changes can dismantle the assumption that one tradition defines the spiritual experience for all.
After all, in a world where 6,000+ belief systems coexist, using “religion” as code for a single faith isn’t just inaccurate—it renders much of humanity’s spiritual brilliance invisible. The challenge lies not in diminishing Christianity’s significance, but in creating spaces where a Buddhist monk’s mindfulness, a Yoruba priestess’s ritual, and a Christian mystic’s prayer can coexist as equally valid expressions of our search for meaning.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Invisible Default: Why Christianity Often Masquerades as “Religion” Globally