The Hidden Pitfalls of “What’s Wrong With This?” – And How to Ask Better
We’ve all been there: staring at a problem, a project, or even a paragraph we’ve written, feeling stuck. In frustration, we turn to someone and blurt out, “What’s wrong with this??” It seems like a straightforward cry for help. But what if this common question is actually part of the problem?
Let’s unpack why this seemingly innocent phrase often backfires—and how reframing our approach can lead to clearer communication, better solutions, and stronger relationships.
—
The Problem With Vague Questions
Imagine a student handing a half-finished essay to a teacher and asking, “What’s wrong with this?” Without context, the teacher has no idea where to start. Is the student struggling with grammar? Thesis structure? Citations? The vagueness of the question creates confusion and wastes time for both parties.
This scenario plays out everywhere:
– A colleague critiques a presentation slide with “This looks off—what’s wrong here?”
– A friend shares a tense text exchange, asking “Why does this feel weird?”
– A DIY enthusiast points at a wobbly shelf, demanding “Fix this!”
The core issue? The question focuses on flaws without clarifying goals or criteria for success. It’s like asking someone to diagnose a car problem without specifying whether it’s making a noise, leaking fluid, or failing to start.
—
Why “What’s Wrong With This?” Falls Short
1. It Assumes There’s a Single “Right” Answer
Problems in real life—whether in math class or workplace conflicts—rarely have one clear flaw. A vague question encourages oversimplified solutions. For example, a manager who asks “What’s wrong with our team’s productivity?” might receive surface-level answers like “People are lazy” instead of nuanced discussions about workload distribution or unclear priorities.
2. It Feels Accusatory
The phrase “wrong with this” carries negative energy. In classrooms, students often hesitate to ask for help because they fear judgment. Similarly, a team member might interpret “What’s wrong with your approach?” as “You messed up,” shutting down collaboration.
3. It Ignores Perspective
A kindergarten teacher shared a revealing story: A student once asked, “What’s wrong with my drawing?” When she replied, “Nothing! It’s creative!,” the child frowned. Later, she discovered he’d been trying (and failing) to draw a realistic horse but hadn’t said so. The “problem” existed only in the gap between his goal and his execution.
—
How to Ask Better Questions
Transforming “What’s wrong with this?” into a productive conversation starts with rethinking how we frame challenges:
1. Clarify Your Objective
Instead of fixating on flaws, define success. For example:
– ❌ “What’s wrong with this science fair project?”
– ✅ “I want my experiment to clearly show cause and effect. How can I make the results easier to understand?”
In workplaces, try:
– ❌ “Why isn’t this marketing campaign working?”
– ✅ “Our goal is to reach parents of toddlers. How can we adjust the messaging to better connect with them?”
2. Share Context
A software developer once debugged a problem for hours before realizing their colleague had modified a key setting “to test something.” Context changes everything. Next time you ask for feedback, add:
– “I’m trying to achieve ___, but ___ keeps happening.”
– “Here’s what I’ve already tried: ___.”
3. Ask for Specific Feedback
Narrow the scope to guide useful responses:
– “Does the introduction of my story hook your attention?”
– “Is the data visualization in Slide 3 confusing?”
– “Does this color scheme feel calming or dull to you?”
4. Flip the Script Positively
Research in education shows that students respond better to “How can we improve…?” than “What’s wrong with…?” This approach, rooted in growth mindset theory, encourages solution-oriented thinking. Try:
– “What’s one thing that could make this proposal stronger?”
– “How might we simplify these instructions for beginners?”
—
The Bigger Picture: Questions Shape Outcomes
The way we ask for help doesn’t just solve immediate problems—it shapes relationships and learning cultures. Studies on workplace communication reveal that teams using open-ended, collaborative language (e.g., “Let’s figure this out together”) report higher trust and innovation compared to those relying on deficit-focused questions.
In classrooms, teachers who model specific, curiosity-driven questions (“Why do you think the character made that choice?”) foster deeper critical thinking than those who default to “What’s the right answer?”
Even in personal relationships, replacing “What’s wrong with you?” with “Help me understand what you’re feeling” can transform conflicts into conversations.
—
Practice Makes Progress
Changing habitual language takes effort, but small shifts yield big results. Next time you’re tempted to ask “What’s wrong with this?,” pause and ask yourself:
– What am I really trying to solve or achieve?
– What information would help others give meaningful feedback?
– How can I invite collaboration instead of criticism?
By framing challenges as shared puzzles rather than faults to be fixed, we open doors to creativity, empathy, and growth. After all, the best solutions rarely come from fixing what’s “wrong”—they come from building what could be.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Hidden Pitfalls of “What’s Wrong With This