The Growing Debate Over School Intruder Drills: Balancing Safety and Student Well-Being
On a chilly Tuesday morning, a first-grade teacher in Ohio instructs her students to crouch silently in a dimly lit corner of the classroom. A voice crackles over the intercom: “This is a drill. Secure the building. This is a drill.” For seven minutes, the children stay frozen, some trembling, others fighting tears. One child whispers, “Is the bad man coming?” This scenario, now routine in thousands of schools across the U.S., has sparked a contentious debate. A growing coalition of parents, educators, and mental health professionals is calling for an end to mandatory intruder drills, arguing that the psychological toll on students outweighs their perceived benefits.
The Rise of Intruder Drills in Schools
Intruder drills, often called “active shooter drills,” became widespread after the 1999 Columbine High School shooting. Designed to prepare students and staff for worst-case scenarios, these exercises range from basic lockdown practices to hyper-realistic simulations involving fake gunfire, masked actors, and bloodied volunteers. Proponents argue that drills reduce panic, save lives, and create a sense of control in an era of frequent school violence.
But critics say the approach has gone too far. “We’re teaching kids to live in fear,” says Dr. Laura Collins, a child psychologist in California. “For many children, especially younger ones, these drills aren’t abstract safety lessons—they feel like real threats to their survival.”
The Hidden Costs of Preparedness
Studies reveal troubling consequences of high-intensity drills. A 2022 study published in JAMA Pediatrics found that students exposed to graphic active shooter drills showed a 42% increase in anxiety and depression symptoms compared to peers who participated in non-visual lockdowns. Younger children often struggle to distinguish drills from real danger, leading to nightmares, school avoidance, and lasting emotional distress.
Teachers, too, are affected. In a National Education Association (NEA) survey, 78% of educators reported feeling “emotionally drained” after drills, with many citing guilt over subjecting students to trauma. “I’ve had kids vomit or wet themselves during drills,” says a middle school teacher in Texas, who asked to remain anonymous. “We’re told this is ‘for their own good,’ but where’s the line between preparedness and harm?”
Questioning Effectiveness
Beyond mental health concerns, researchers are scrutinizing whether intruder drills actually improve safety. Data from the FBI and Department of Education shows no conclusive evidence that drills reduce casualties during school shootings. In some cases, they may even create new risks. During a 2019 drill in Indiana, police accidentally fired live rounds instead of blanks, causing injuries. Other incidents include students being trampled during chaotic simulations or mistaking real emergencies for drills.
Critics also argue that drills focus on reactive measures rather than addressing root causes of violence, such as easy access to firearms or gaps in mental health support. “We’re treating symptoms, not the disease,” says David Hogg, a Parkland shooting survivor and activist. “Investing in counselors and community resources would do more to prevent violence than terrifying kids.”
Alternatives to High-Intensity Drills
Schools exploring alternatives emphasize trauma-informed approaches. For example, some districts have replaced graphic simulations with age-appropriate discussions about safety. “We practice ‘safe spots’ without mentioning shooters,” says a Colorado elementary principal. “It’s framed like a fire drill—something we do to stay prepared, not something to fear.”
Other strategies include:
– Collaborative drills: Partnering with local law enforcement to design exercises that minimize student involvement.
– Focus on prevention: Training staff to identify warning signs, de-escalate conflicts, and foster inclusive school climates.
– Mental health integration: Providing therapy dogs, quiet rooms, or counseling sessions after drills to help students process emotions.
A Path Forward: Balancing Safety and Compassion
Ending intruder drills entirely remains controversial. Many parents and administrators argue that dismissing drills entirely ignores the grim reality of school shootings. “No one wants to scare kids, but we can’t pretend threats don’t exist,” says Mark O’Donnell, a school safety coordinator in Florida.
The solution may lie in customization. Experts at organizations like the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) recommend tailoring drills to developmental stages. High schoolers might benefit from straightforward lockdown practices, while preschoolers could engage in games that teach quiet hiding without explicit references to danger. Transparency is also key. Schools that explain drills in advance—and reassure students that adults are working to keep them safe—report lower anxiety levels.
Voices Driving Change
Grassroots movements are gaining momentum. Parents like Maria Gonzalez, whose 8-year-old developed severe separation anxiety after a drill, are petitioning school boards to revise policies. “My son didn’t sleep for weeks. He kept asking, ‘Will someone shoot me today?’” she says. “No child should carry that burden.”
Legislative efforts are also underway. States like Illinois and Maryland now limit drills to twice a year and prohibit simulations involving fake weapons or blood. Meanwhile, organizations like Everytown for Gun Safety advocate for federal funding to replace fear-based drills with research-backed violence prevention programs.
Rethinking Safety in a Complex World
The debate over intruder drills reflects a broader societal challenge: How do we protect children without robbing them of their sense of security? While there’s no one-size-fits-all answer, the conversation is shifting toward holistic solutions that prioritize both physical safety and emotional well-being.
As schools navigate this balance, the message from students is clear. “We know the world can be scary,” says 16-year-old activist Emily Torres. “But we also need to feel safe in our classrooms—not just from bullets, but from despair.” By listening to these voices, educators and policymakers can redefine what it means to truly keep kids safe.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Growing Debate Over School Intruder Drills: Balancing Safety and Student Well-Being