The Great Planner Debate: Who Wants to Scrap Traditional School Organisers in the UK?
Every September, British students receive a familiar item alongside their textbooks: the school planner. For decades, these pocket-sized booklets have been a staple of UK education, designed to help pupils track homework, record deadlines, and jot down school announcements. But in recent years, a growing chorus of voices has questioned whether these planners still serve a purpose in today’s classrooms—or whether they’ve become outdated relics. So, who’s leading the charge to ditch school planners, and why? Let’s unpack the debate.
The Case Against Planners: Students Speak Up
Unsurprisingly, students themselves are among the loudest critics of traditional planners. Many argue that the physical format feels out of step with their digital lives. “I’ve got reminders on my phone, a shared family calendar at home, and teachers post assignments online anyway,” says 15-year-old Liam from Manchester. “Writing everything again in a planner just feels like extra work.”
This sentiment is particularly strong among older students. Sixth-formers often juggle part-time jobs, extracurriculars, and university applications alongside studies—a complexity that rigid planner layouts rarely accommodate. “My planner has sections for ‘merit stamps’ and lunch money records,” notes Aisha, a Year 12 student in London. “Meanwhile, I’m trying to track UCAS deadlines and work shifts. It’s not built for real life.”
Parental Frustrations: “We Never Check It!”
Parents, too, are joining the conversation. While planners were originally intended to improve home-school communication, many families report that the system isn’t working. A 2023 survey by ParentKind found that 62% of parents rarely or never look at their child’s planner, with most preferring direct emails or app notifications from schools.
“The planner ends up being this black hole of information,” explains Sarah, a mother of two in Bristol. “Either my kids forget to write things down, or I forget to check it. When there’s an urgent message about school trips or closures, I’d much rather get a text.” Some parents also highlight accessibility issues, as those working long hours or with limited English proficiency struggle to maintain planner-related routines.
Teachers’ Mixed Feelings: Admin Burden vs. Routine
Educators find themselves caught in the middle. While many acknowledge planners’ limitations, others defend them as valuable teaching tools. “Learning to organise oneself is a core skill,” argues Mr. Thompson, a secondary school teacher in Leeds. “The act of writing down tasks helps with memory retention and time management—skills that matter even in a digital world.”
However, frontline staff also bear the brunt of managing planner systems. Teachers report spending significant time checking planners for signatures, issuing replacements for lost books, and mediating disputes when students claim they “didn’t know” about assignments. “It becomes less about organisation and more about compliance,” says Ms. Khan, a maths teacher in Birmingham. “I’d rather use that energy for actual teaching.”
The Digital Alternative: Apps, Platforms, and Equity Concerns
Proponents of scrapping planners often point to technology as the solution. Learning platforms like Google Classroom and Microsoft Teams already centralise assignments and deadlines, while apps such as MyStudyLife or Trello offer customisable organisation tools. Some forward-thinking schools have begun piloting hybrid systems, using planners only for younger year groups while transitioning older students to digital tools.
But this shift raises new questions. Not all families have equal access to devices or reliable internet—a concern highlighted during pandemic-era remote learning. “If we go fully digital, we risk leaving behind students from disadvantaged backgrounds,” warns Dr. Emily Carter, an education researcher at the University of Sheffield. Any transition would need to address this through school-provided devices or offline alternatives.
The Silent Majority: Why Some Still Defend Planners
Despite the criticisms, planners retain passionate defenders. Child development experts highlight their role in building executive functioning skills, particularly for neurodivergent students who benefit from tactile, screen-free planning methods. Stationery companies (unsurprisingly) argue that writing by hand enhances focus and creativity compared to typing.
There’s also a cultural element. For many Brits, school planners evoke nostalgia—a tangible link to their own schooldays. “Scrapping planners feels like losing a piece of school identity,” muses history teacher Mrs. Edwards. “They’re part of the rhythm of the academic year, from that fresh September smell to the doodles and notes by July.”
The Middle Ground: Rethinking Rather Than Abandoning
Perhaps the solution lies not in outright elimination but in reinvention. Some schools are experimenting with:
– Customisable planners with adaptable sections for different age groups
– Integrated systems where key planner content syncs with parent apps
– Sustainability-focused options like reusable notebooks or digital/physical hybrids
Students like 14-year-old Ethan suggest simple fixes: “Let us personalise planners more. Add pages for goal-setting or mental health check-ins. Make them actually useful instead of just another thing to get signed.”
What Does the Future Hold?
The Department for Education leaves planner decisions to individual schools, meaning changes will likely happen unevenly across the UK. While urban academies with strong tech infrastructure lean toward digital solutions, rural and special educational needs schools may retain traditional formats longer.
What’s clear is that the conversation reflects broader shifts in education. As one headteacher puts it: “This isn’t really about paper vs. pixels. It’s about preparing students for a world where organisation means managing multiple streams of information—whether that’s in a notebook, a smartwatch, or tech we haven’t invented yet.”
Whether planners stay or go, their evolving role underscores a universal truth: effective education systems must adapt to how real people live and learn today. The answer might not be to simply scrap an old tool, but to ensure every student has access to organisational methods that truly set them up for success—both in school and beyond.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Great Planner Debate: Who Wants to Scrap Traditional School Organisers in the UK