The Curious Case of ITA: When Early Reading Tools Complicate Adult Spelling
If you grew up in certain British or Australian schools during the 1960s-1980s, you might have a vivid memory of colorful books filled with strange symbols that looked like a mix of letters and hieroglyphics. This wasn’t a secret code or an alien language—it was the Initial Teaching Alphabet (ITA), a phonics-based system designed to simplify early reading. Decades later, some adults who learned with ITA report an unexpected side effect: persistent spelling struggles. Let’s unpack why this seemingly innovative tool left lingering challenges—and what can be done about it.
What Was ITA, Anyway?
Developed by British educator Sir James Pitman in 1961, the Initial Teaching Alphabet aimed to bridge the gap between spoken and written English. Traditional English spelling, with its irregular rules (think “through” vs. “tough”), can overwhelm beginners. ITA tackled this by using 44 unique symbols, each representing a distinct sound in English. For example, the word “night” became “niet” in ITA, aligning with its phonetic pronunciation. The idea was simple: kids would learn to read faster with a consistent system before transitioning to standard spelling.
And it worked—at first. Studies from the era showed children using ITA progressed quicker in reading than peers learning traditional orthography. The problem arose later, during the transition phase.
The Great ITA Transition: Where Things Got Sticky
Imagine spending your formative years associating sounds with specific symbols, only to be told, “Now forget half of what you learned—here’s a new set of rules!” For many ITA learners, switching to standard English around age 7 felt like starting from scratch.
Why the confusion?
1. Symbol Overlap: Some ITA characters resembled traditional letters but represented different sounds. For instance, the ITA symbol for the “th” sound in “this” looked like a lowercase d with a horizontal line. Seeing a regular d later could trigger conflicting muscle memory.
2. Inconsistent Rules: While ITA was logical, English spelling is famously not. Transitioning students suddenly faced silent letters, homophones (e.g., “their” vs. “there”), and exceptions they hadn’t encountered before.
3. Timing Matters: Critics argue that delaying exposure to standard spelling until age 7—when critical language windows are closing—may have hindered long-term adaptability.
Adult Spelling Woes: Is ITA to Blame?
Fast-forward to adulthood. You’re typing an email and pause at “necessary.” Is it two c’s or two s’s? For some ITA alumni, these moments aren’t occasional—they’re frequent.
Online forums like Reddit buzz with anecdotes:
– “I learned ITA in the ’70s and still mix up ‘said’ and ‘sed.’”
– “My brain defaults to phonetic spelling. I write ‘fotograf’ instead of ‘photograph.’”
– “I rely on spell-check for even basic words.”
But is ITA solely responsible? Experts say it’s complicated.
Factors at play:
– Cognitive Anchoring: Early exposure to ITA’s “sound-based” system may have wired the brain to prioritize phonetics over visual memorization of irregular words.
– Teaching Quality: Some schools phased out ITA abruptly, leaving students unprepared. Others blended ITA with traditional methods, yielding better outcomes.
– Individual Differences: Dyslexia or other learning differences could amplify challenges, regardless of teaching tools.
Rewiring the Brain: Tips for Overcoming ITA-Related Spelling Hurdles
If ITA left you distrustful of your spelling, don’t despair. Neuroplasticity means our brains can adapt at any age. Here’s how to retrain:
1. Embrace “Word Mapping”
– Pair problem words with visual or contextual cues. For example, remember that “stationery” (paper) contains er like “paper,” while “stationary” (still) has ar like “car.”
2. Use Multisensory Learning
– Write tricky words repeatedly while saying their letters aloud. The combination of motion, sound, and sight reinforces memory.
3. Leverage Technology (Without Guilt)
– Tools like Grammarly or speech-to-text can act as training wheels. Over time, you’ll internalize corrections.
4. Play Games
– Scrabble, Bananagrams, or even Wordle sharpen pattern recognition and spelling intuition.
5. Study Etymology
– Understanding a word’s roots (e.g., “photo” = light, “graph” = write) demystifies spelling.
The Legacy of ITA: Lessons for Today’s Educators
ITA’s rise and fall offer valuable insights:
– Balance Innovation with Tradition: While simplifying systems can boost early confidence, they must align with real-world applications. Modern phonics programs now blend sound-based learning with gradual exposure to traditional spelling.
– Transition Support Matters: Schools using interim tools (like ITA) must plan structured, compassionate phase-outs.
– No One-Size-Fits-All: What works for 80% of students might disrupt the other 20%. Personalized adjustments are key.
Final Thoughts
For those who learned ITA, spelling struggles aren’t a reflection of intelligence—they’re a quirk of a well-intentioned experiment. By reframing these challenges as solvable puzzles, rather than permanent deficits, it’s possible to regain confidence. After all, language is a living tool, not a rigid code. And if all else fails, remember: Shakespeare couldn’t spell consistently either.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Curious Case of ITA: When Early Reading Tools Complicate Adult Spelling