The Books That Made Us Hate Reading: A Look at Mandatory Classroom Classics
We’ve all been there: staring at a syllabus, groaning internally at yet another “must-read” novel assigned by a teacher. While literature has the power to inspire, some books feel less like gateways to imagination and more like punishment. Let’s unpack the titles that turned reading into a chore for many—and explore why they sparked such dread.
The Classics That Missed the Mark
For decades, schools have relied on a rotating cast of “great books” to teach themes like morality, identity, and societal conflict. But not all classics resonate equally. Take, for example, The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne. On paper, it’s a masterpiece about shame, sin, and hypocrisy in Puritan society. In practice? Many students describe it as a slog. The dense prose, archaic language, and glacial pacing often overshadow its themes. One high schooler put it bluntly: “I felt like I was deciphering a secret code, not reading a story.”
Then there’s Lord of the Flies by William Golding. While its exploration of human savagery is undeniably thought-provoking, some argue it’s too bleak for younger readers. “It felt like the author was shouting, ‘Humans are terrible!’ for 200 pages,” said a college freshman reflecting on her middle school experience. For students already grappling with real-world anxieties, the unrelenting nihilism can feel more traumatizing than enlightening.
The Modern Misfires
Mandatory reading lists aren’t limited to dusty 19th-century novels. Contemporary picks can also miss the mark. The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, for instance, divides readers. While some connect with Holden Caulfield’s teenage angst, others find him insufferable. “He’s whiny, judgmental, and repetitive,” complained a 20-year-old who read the book in tenth grade. “I kept thinking, ‘Why should I care about this guy?’” The disconnect often stems from Holden’s privilege—a frustration for students who can’t relate to his prep-school problems.
Another culprit? The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald. Yes, it’s a Jazz Age gem with lush symbolism. But its detached characters and meandering subplots leave some readers cold. “It’s like watching a party you weren’t invited to,” said a book club member. “Everyone’s rich, miserable, and making bad choices. What’s the lesson here?”
Why Do These Books Flop?
The issue isn’t always the books themselves—it’s how they’re framed. Take Moby-Dick by Herman Melville. A 600-page epic about obsession? Fascinating! But when rushed through in a three-week unit, it becomes a blur of whale biology and existential monologues. Teachers often prioritize “getting through” the text over fostering engagement. “We spent so much time analyzing metaphors that we forgot to discuss why anyone should care,” recalled a former student.
Another problem: relevance. Many classics center on experiences far removed from modern life. Tess of the d’Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy, for example, critiques Victorian-era sexism. But its slow-burn tragedy can feel alien to Gen Z readers raised on fast-paced, diverse narratives. “I appreciate what it’s trying to say,” said a literature major, “but Tess’s passivity frustrated me. I wanted her to fight back, not just suffer.”
When “Good for You” Feels Bad
There’s also the issue of forced analysis. Books like Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad or Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett are intellectual heavyweights, but their abstract themes can overwhelm casual readers. “I felt stupid because I didn’t ‘get’ it,” admitted a student about Godot. “The teacher made it sound like there was one right interpretation, and I was missing it.” This pressure to “decode” literature—rather than enjoy it—sucks the fun out of reading.
Even worse are texts that feel culturally tone-deaf. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, while lauded for addressing racism, has faced criticism for its “white savior” narrative. “Atticus Finch is held up as this moral hero, but the story sidelines Black voices,” noted a high school senior. “It left me wondering why we weren’t reading firsthand accounts from the Civil Rights era instead.”
Rethinking the Reading List
So what’s the fix? First, balance is key. Pairing classics with modern, relatable works can bridge the gap. For every 1984, why not add a dystopian novel like The Hunger Games? The latter’s fast pace and strong protagonist might engage students who find Orwell’s prose intimidating.
Second, let students choose. Offering options within a theme—say, “identity and belonging”—allows them to pick books that speak to their experiences. A teen who hated The Old Man and the Sea might devour The House on Mango Street instead.
Finally, teachers can reframe how literature is taught. Instead of drilling symbolism, why ask: “What would you do in this character’s shoes?” or “Does this story remind you of anything happening today?” Connecting books to real-life issues makes them feel urgent—not outdated.
The Takeaway
Bad mandatory reads often fail because they’re taught as artifacts, not living stories. The goal shouldn’t be to force students to worship the classics but to show how literature mirrors humanity’s messy, ever-evolving journey. After all, the right book at the wrong time can kill a love of reading—but a little flexibility might just revive it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Books That Made Us Hate Reading: A Look at Mandatory Classroom Classics