The 2013 Chinese Gaokao: When the Test Asked the Ultimate Question
Imagine the pressure. Picture millions of teenagers, pencils clutched in sweating hands, seated under fluorescent lights in hushed halls across China. The air crackles with tension. This is Gaokao day – the national college entrance examination. For years, your entire academic life has funneled towards this single, life-defining test. Your score dictates your university options, your career trajectory, perhaps even your family’s social standing. In 2013, for nearly 9 million students, that pressure reached a fever pitch. And in the midst of the notoriously difficult Mathematics exam, a question appeared that seemed to echo the existential dread of every examinee: “What’s the answer?”
No, that wasn’t a student’s desperate plea scribbled in the margin. It was the actual question on the paper. Question 13 in the Mathematics section for the Jiangsu province exam read simply:
> “What’s the answer?”
Below it were five possible choices: A, B, C, D, and E. That was it. No equation to solve, no theorem to apply, no data to analyze. Just the question itself. The sheer absurdity went viral instantly, sparking nationwide bewilderment, outrage, and dark humor. How could the ultimate symbol of academic rigor, the gatekeeper to China’s future elite, ask something so seemingly nonsensical?
The Gaokao Goliath
To understand the magnitude of this moment, you need to grasp the Gaokao’s cultural and personal weight. Often described as the most important exam in the world for its impact on individual lives, the Gaokao spans two or three grueling days. Subjects include Chinese, Mathematics, and a foreign language (usually English), plus additional subjects depending on the student’s chosen stream (Science or Humanities). Success demands years of relentless memorization, practice tests, and tutoring. Failure, or even underperformance, can feel catastrophic. It’s a system designed for precision ranking, where a single point can mean the difference between a dream university and disappointment. Fairness and objectivity are sacrosanct, or so it seems.
Deconstructing the Question: Absurdity or Genius?
So, what was the answer to Question 13? Internet sleuths and frustrated students quickly deduced the context. Earlier questions in the paper involved complex calculations. The consensus emerged that Question 13 was likely a placeholder – a final instruction directing students to transfer their answer choices for the preceding problems onto a separate answer sheet. Essentially, it meant: “Now, what are your answers for questions 1-12?”
The irony, however, was profound and stung deeply:
1. The Ultimate Meta-Question: On a test designed to measure knowledge and problem-solving, the most discussed question wasn’t a problem at all. It was a question about the answers themselves. It felt like the test, in a moment of bizarre self-awareness, was mocking the entire process.
2. Highlighting the Mechanistic System: The incident starkly revealed the Gaokao’s potential for absurd rigidity. It prioritized the mechanics of test-taking (bubble sheets, precise instructions) over the actual intellectual content it purported to value. Students weren’t just tested on math; they were tested on their ability to navigate the ritual of the Gaokao itself.
3. Symbol of Student Anxiety: “What’s the answer?” perfectly encapsulated the core anxiety of every Gaokao taker. It was the unspoken scream in every hall. The question, intended as mundane instruction, became a powerful, unintended symbol of the immense pressure and uncertainty students faced.
Beyond the Laughs: Sparking a Necessary Debate
While the internet buzzed with memes and jokes, the “What’s the answer?” incident sparked a much more serious conversation. It became a focal point for long-standing criticisms of the Gaokao system:
Creativity vs. Rote Learning: Critics argued the Gaokao stifled creativity and critical thinking, favoring memorization and exam technique over genuine understanding and innovation. The absurdity of Question 13 seemed to embody this flaw.
Pressure Cooker Environment: The incident highlighted the immense psychological toll the exam takes on students. The fallout – the confusion, the fear of getting such a “simple” instruction wrong – underscored the unhealthy levels of stress.
Systemic Rigidity: It exposed the inflexibility of a system so vast that a simple administrative placeholder could be misinterpreted and cause widespread distress, raising questions about its adaptability and focus.
The Legacy: More Than Just a Joke
The 2013 Gaokao’s “What’s the answer?” question remains a potent cultural touchstone. It wasn’t just a funny exam blooper; it was a moment where the inherent tensions within the Gaokao system burst into public view in a uniquely surreal way. It forced a conversation that continues today.
Reform efforts have been ongoing for years, aiming to reduce the Gaokao’s overwhelming dominance and incorporate more holistic assessments of students. Universities are increasingly allowed to consider other factors beyond the single score. Yet, the Gaokao remains the cornerstone. Its sheer scale and the deeply ingrained cultural belief in its meritocratic potential (however flawed) make radical change slow.
The question “What’s the answer?” for the Gaokao itself is far more complex than A, B, C, D, or E. The answer lies somewhere in the ongoing struggle to balance:
The need for a large-scale, objective selection mechanism.
The desire to foster creativity and well-rounded individuals.
The imperative to alleviate crushing student stress.
The challenge of evolving an institution deeply rooted in tradition.
That single, bizarre line on a 2013 math paper didn’t provide a solution, but it asked a question China is still grappling with: What is the Gaokao really for, and is it asking the right questions of its students? The answer to that question remains a work in progress, echoing far beyond the examination halls of that unforgettable year.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The 2013 Chinese Gaokao: When the Test Asked the Ultimate Question