Rethinking School Safety: The Growing Debate Over Intruder Drills
When a fire alarm blares in a school hallway, students and teachers know the routine: exit the building calmly and gather at a designated safe location. These drills have existed for decades, normalized as a standard part of school preparedness. But what happens when the threat isn’t a hypothetical fire—it’s an armed intruder? Over the past 20 years, lockdown or “intruder drills” have become commonplace in schools across the U.S., with 40 states requiring them by law. Yet a growing chorus of parents, educators, and mental health professionals are now questioning whether these exercises do more harm than good.
The Rise of Intruder Drills
Lockdown drills emerged in response to high-profile school shootings, particularly after the 1999 Columbine massacre. The goal was straightforward: teach students and staff to barricade doors, turn off lights, and hide silently to increase survivability during an attack. Over time, these drills evolved. Some schools began simulating realistic scenarios, complete with fake gunfire, masked “intruders,” or even blood packets. Proponents argued that such realism could save lives, much like practicing a fire evacuation.
But critics noticed unintended consequences. Students—especially younger children—struggled to distinguish drills from real danger. A 2021 study by the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) found that drills triggered anxiety, nightmares, and hypervigilance in some children. Teachers, too, reported feeling unsettled. “After a drill, my third graders would ask, ‘Is someone going to shoot us today?’” said one elementary school educator. “How do you answer that without lying or terrifying them?”
The Case Against Traditional Drills
Those calling for an end to intruder drills often highlight three concerns: psychological harm, inconsistent effectiveness, and equity issues.
1. Mental Health Risks
Trauma experts warn that repeated exposure to fear-based drills can retraumatize students who’ve experienced violence or loss. Even those without prior trauma may internalize a sense of perpetual threat. A 2020 survey by Everytown for Gun Safety found that 75% of students felt “scared” or “helpless” during drills. “We’re conditioning kids to view school as a battleground,” said Dr. Laura McArthur, a child psychologist. “That undermines their ability to learn and form trusting relationships.”
2. Lack of Evidence
While drills are well-intentioned, there’s little data proving they reduce casualties. The National Association of School Resource Officers (NASRO) advises against hyper-realistic simulations, noting they can desensitize students or even provide tactical information to potential attackers. Research also suggests that survival during shootings often depends on split-second decisions, not rehearsed routines.
3. Disproportionate Impact
Schools in high-crime neighborhoods often face pressure to intensify drills, exacerbating stress in communities already grappling with violence. Meanwhile, wealthier districts may invest in high-tech security systems, creating a disparity in how safety is perceived and experienced.
Alternative Approaches to School Safety
If traditional intruder drills are problematic, what’s the alternative? Many advocates propose shifting focus toward prevention, emotional support, and less traumatic preparedness strategies.
1. Non-Simulated Drills
Organizations like the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) recommend “announced” drills that avoid surprise elements. Teachers might explain the drill in advance, using age-appropriate language like, “We’re practicing how to stay safe in case of an emergency.” This reduces shock while still teaching practical steps like locking doors.
2. Trauma-Informed Practices
Schools can partner with mental health professionals to design drills that acknowledge students’ emotional needs. For example, after a drill, teachers might hold circle time to address fears or invite questions. “The goal is to empower kids, not frighten them,” said a counselor working with Chicago Public Schools.
3. Community-Centered Solutions
Many safety experts argue that physical drills are just one piece of the puzzle. Preventing violence requires addressing root causes: bullying, social isolation, and easy access to firearms. Programs like Sandy Hook Promise’s “See Something, Say Something” campaign train students to recognize warning signs and report concerns—a proactive approach that’s prevented multiple planned attacks.
Finding Common Ground
The debate over intruder drills often becomes polarized, with one side accused of ignoring safety and the other of ignoring trauma. But most educators and parents share the same goal: keeping kids safe.
Some districts are adopting hybrid models. For example, schools might conduct low-key lockdown drills twice a year while investing in threat-assessment teams or anonymous reporting systems. Others are reevaluating security infrastructure, like installing bullet-resistant glass or hiring counselors instead of armed guards.
“We need to move beyond a one-size-fits-all approach,” said a school safety director in Oregon. “What works for a rural high school might not work for an urban elementary school.”
The Path Forward
The push to end traditional intruder drills reflects a broader reevaluation of school safety culture. While preparedness remains critical, it shouldn’t come at the cost of student well-being. By balancing practicality with compassion, schools can create environments where children feel both secure and supported.
As one high school student put it during a town hall meeting: “We shouldn’t have to choose between feeling safe and feeling okay. School is where we grow—it shouldn’t feel like a survival game.”
Whether through revised drills, improved mental health resources, or community-driven prevention, the solution lies in redefining safety as something more than just preparation for the worst. It’s about building a foundation where fear doesn’t overshadow learning—and where every child has the chance to thrive.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Rethinking School Safety: The Growing Debate Over Intruder Drills