Remember That Square Dance? A Question for Grads of the 50s, 60s & 70s
Okay, gather ‘round, folks who remember blackboards actually being black, when gym shorts were decidedly not stylish, and the crackle of a vinyl record meant PE class was about to get… interesting. We’re talking about the era of crew cuts, bobby socks, maybe even paddle pops after school. And there’s this one particular memory, a quirk of the times, that I’ve been puzzling over. Did your school do this?
Picture the scene: the cavernous, echoing gymnasium, smelling faintly of sweat and floor wax. The unforgiving hardwood floor. Mr. or Mrs. [Insert Stern PE Teacher Name Here] standing resolutely by the bulky record player. Instead of the expected calisthenics or dodgeball, the command rings out: “Alright class, partners for square dancing!”
Now, here’s the strange part – the sheer ordinariness of it, yet how utterly specific and, well, mandated it seemed, especially considering the world outside those gym walls. This wasn’t a special event; it was a regular feature of the physical education curriculum for countless students across the country during those decades.
The Mechanics of Mayhem (Or Mild Embarrassment)
Remember the drill? Often, partners weren’t chosen freely. Teachers frequently orchestrated the pairings, sometimes lining boys on one side, girls on the other, leading to awkward shuffling and averted eyes. The instruction was clear: “Boys, bow to your partner! Girls, curtsy!” Even the most reluctant participants knew the steps – allemande left, do-si-do, promenade – all called out over the scratchy twang of fiddle music emanating from those thick 78 RPM records. “Swing your partner!” meant a brief, stiff hold, maybe hands on shoulders and waists, executed with all the grace of startled deer, often accompanied by nervous giggles or profound discomfort.
Why Square Dancing? Why Then?
This is the core of the strangeness. Think about the cultural backdrop of the 1950s, 60s, and even into the 70s. Rock ‘n’ roll was exploding. Teenagers were twisting, shouting, and developing their own vibrant dance cultures. Yet, inside the school gyms, it was as if time had frozen decades, if not centuries, prior.
So, why was this particular folk dance elevated to near-universal status in PE classes? Several likely factors converged:
1. Post-War Patriotism & “Wholesome Americana”: The post-World War II era saw a strong push towards defining a unified American identity. Square dancing, heavily promoted (and arguably somewhat invented or standardized) as a “traditional” American folk art, fit perfectly into this narrative. It was seen as clean, wholesome, and distinctly American, contrasting with perceived “foreign” or “undesirable” influences.
2. Henry Ford’s Unexpected Legacy: Believe it or not, the automotive pioneer played a huge role. Ford, concerned about declining social graces (and perhaps jazz!), heavily promoted square and folk dancing in the 1920s and 30s as a wholesome alternative. This push created infrastructure – instructors, callers, records – that schools readily adopted decades later.
3. PE’s Broader Mission: Physical Education wasn’t just about fitness back then. It was often seen as a vehicle for teaching social skills, discipline, and conformity. Square dancing offered a structured, teacher-controlled way to enforce mixed-gender interaction (within very strict boundaries!), practice following directions precisely (listen for the call!), and learn basic “courtesies” (the bow, the curtsy).
4. Logistical Ease & Control: Compared to teaching jitterbug or later disco, square dancing was relatively simple to teach en masse. The steps were basic, the formations fixed. It required minimal space per couple and, crucially for nervous administrators, involved limited, highly stylized physical contact. It kept energetic kids moving in a controlled pattern, avoiding the perceived chaos of freestyle dancing.
5. The Hidden Curriculum: Beyond the steps, there was an implicit lesson in traditional gender roles – boys lead, girls follow; boys bow, girls curtsy. It reinforced a specific social order deemed appropriate for the time.
The Lingering Echoes of the Promenade
Looking back, it feels like a peculiar cultural artifact. For some, it was pure, unadulterated awkwardness – a forced march through social discomfort set to fiddle music. Others might recall snippets of genuine fun, the rare moment the whole class got the figure-eight weave right, or the shared laughter at someone’s spectacularly wrong turn. Maybe it sparked a lifelong love of folk dance for a few.
But the strangeness remains: the sheer disconnect between the youthful energy pulsating outside the school and the deliberate, almost nostalgic choice being made inside the gym. It was a top-down cultural imposition, a specific flavor of “character building” delivered via do-si-do and promenade.
So, Did Your School Do This?
That’s the question for those who lived it! Was square dancing a staple of your PE experience in the 50s, 60s, or 70s?
What do you remember most vividly? The scratch of the record? The panic of finding a partner? The feel of the gym floor?
How did your class react? Was it met with groans, indifference, or surprising enthusiasm?
Did the teacher seem passionate about it, or just following the curriculum?
What state or region were you in? Was it universal, or more common in certain areas?
Any particularly memorable mishaps or moments of triumph?
For those who didn’t experience it, it might sound quaint or bizarre. But for a generation, it was simply… gym class. A strange, mandatory ritual performed in ankle socks and sneakers, a peculiar footnote in the history of American education and social engineering. That distinctive sound of the fiddle kicking in still transports many right back to the squeak of sneakers on the gym floor and the unique social experiment that was square dance PE. So, let’s hear those memories – the good, the bad, and the utterly bewildering!
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Remember That Square Dance