I Gave In to School Administrators and Said I Used AI: A Teacher’s Reflection on Technology in Education
It was a Thursday afternoon when I found myself sitting across from three school administrators, my laptop open to a student’s essay draft. The room felt uncomfortably quiet, save for the faint hum of the air conditioner. One of them leaned forward, pointing at a paragraph. “This doesn’t sound like the student’s voice,” she said. “Did they use AI?”
I hesitated.
The truth was, I’d encouraged my students to experiment with AI tools for brainstorming and drafting—not to replace their critical thinking, but to enhance it. Many struggled with writer’s block or lacked confidence in structuring arguments. AI, I believed, could act as a collaborative partner, helping them organize ideas before refining the work independently. But in that moment, faced with skepticism from the administration, I faltered. “Yes,” I replied. “I allowed them to use AI.”
What followed was a tense conversation about academic integrity, the “dangers” of technology, and whether my approach undermined learning outcomes. By the end of the meeting, I’d agreed to halt AI use in my classroom. Walking back to my desk, I felt a mix of frustration and doubt. Had I betrayed my students’ trust—and my own beliefs—by conceding so quickly?
The Rise of AI in Education: A Double-Edged Sword
Artificial intelligence has become a polarizing force in classrooms. Tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and QuillBot promise efficiency: instant feedback, grammar corrections, and even creative prompts. For students juggling multiple assignments or navigating language barriers, these tools can level the playing field. A shy student might use AI to draft a speech, gain confidence, and eventually deliver it in their own words. Another might rely on it to clarify complex concepts before discussing them in class.
Yet schools often view AI with suspicion. Concerns about plagiarism, diminished critical thinking, and the erosion of “authentic” learning dominate discussions. Administrators worry about shortcuts—students submitting AI-generated essays without engaging with the material. Teachers, meanwhile, grapple with ethical questions: Where do we draw the line between assistance and cheating?
In my case, the line blurred. I’d introduced AI as a scaffold, not a crutch. Students used it to generate outlines or rephrase confusing sentences, but final submissions required original analysis. Still, the administration saw only the risks, not the potential. Their stance was clear: Better safe than sorry.
Why I Gave In—And Why I Regret It
Surrendering to the administration’s demands felt like the path of least resistance. As a mid-career teacher, I didn’t want to be labeled a troublemaker or risk losing opportunities for professional growth. Worse, I feared my students would face repercussions if I defended AI too vehemently. So I complied, removing AI from my curriculum and reverting to traditional methods.
The consequences were immediate. Students who’d thrived with AI support now struggled. One freshman confessed, “I finally felt like I could keep up with the readings, but now I’m lost again.” Another lamented that revising essays without real-time feedback felt “like writing in the dark.” My compromise hadn’t preserved academic rigor—it had stifled progress for those who needed flexibility the most.
Rethinking the Role of Educators in the AI Era
This experience forced me to confront a critical question: What is our responsibility as educators in an AI-driven world? Banning technology out of fear ignores reality. Students will use AI regardless of school policies—often in ways that aren’t transparent or constructive. Instead of policing, we should guide them toward ethical, intentional use.
For instance, teaching students to:
1. Treat AI as a starting point, not a final product. Use it to brainstorm topics or identify gaps in logic, but insist on original analysis.
2. Cite AI-generated content transparently, just as they would a textbook or online source.
3. Critique AI outputs. Is this argument biased? Does it lack evidence? Encourage skepticism.
This approach doesn’t eliminate risks, but it fosters accountability. It also aligns with a broader truth: Education isn’t about memorizing facts or avoiding tools—it’s about learning how to think, adapt, and solve problems. AI, when used thoughtfully, can amplify those skills.
Moving Forward: A Call for Dialogue, Not Dogma
The tension between innovation and tradition in education isn’t new. Calculators, Wikipedia, and even ballpoint pens faced similar backlash in their time. What’s different now is the pace of change. AI evolves daily, and schools can’t afford reactive, fear-based policies.
To administrators, I’d say this: Engage teachers and students in crafting AI guidelines. Host workshops to explore its capabilities and limitations. Most importantly, trust educators to balance integrity with empathy. We know our students’ needs better than any policy document ever could.
As for me? I’m slowly reintroducing AI into my classes—this time with clearer boundaries and open conversations about its role. Some days, it feels like walking a tightrope. But if we silence innovation to maintain the status quo, we fail to prepare students for a world where AI is inevitable.
The goal isn’t to surrender to technology or to school policies. It’s to empower learners to navigate both with integrity, curiosity, and courage. After all, isn’t that what education is really about?
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » I Gave In to School Administrators and Said I Used AI: A Teacher’s Reflection on Technology in Education