How LGBTQ+ Candidates Are Reshaping Local School Boards Amid National Debates
When Sarah McBride made history in 2020 as the first openly transgender state senator in the U.S., her victory signaled a broader shift: LGBTQ+ individuals are no longer waiting for others to defend their rights—they’re stepping into political roles themselves. Nowhere is this trend more visible than in local school board races, where LGBTQ+ candidates are challenging stereotypes, confronting misinformation, and advocating for inclusive education amid intensifying culture wars.
The School Board Battleground
School boards have become flashpoints in America’s ideological clashes. From debates over curriculum content to policies on transgender student rights, these elected bodies now wield outsized influence over how young people learn about identity, history, and citizenship. Conservative groups like Moms for Liberty and Parents Defending Education have mobilized to ban books with LGBTQ+ themes, restrict discussions of gender identity, and limit protections for transgender students.
In response, LGBTQ+ individuals and allies are running for school board seats to counter these efforts. “I never imagined running for office, but when I saw my community under attack, I knew silence wasn’t an option,” says Jamie Wilson, a nonbinary candidate who recently won a seat in a suburban Colorado district. Their campaign focused on ensuring access to mental health resources for LGBTQ+ youth and preserving inclusive history lessons.
Why School Boards Matter
School boards shape policies that directly impact students’ daily lives: which books line library shelves, how bullying is addressed, and whether classrooms reflect diverse perspectives. For LGBTQ+ youth—who face higher rates of depression and suicide risk compared to their peers—these decisions can be lifesaving. A 2023 GLSEN survey found that LGBTQ+ students in schools with supportive policies reported better mental health outcomes and academic performance.
Yet recent years have seen coordinated efforts to roll back inclusivity. Florida’s “Don’t Say Gay” law, which prohibits classroom discussions about sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades, inspired similar proposals in over a dozen states. Meanwhile, school boards in Texas and Virginia have removed books like Gender Queer and All Boys Aren’t Blue from libraries, often citing vague claims about “protecting children.”
LGBTQ+ Candidates: From Marginalized to Mobilized
Historically, LGBTQ+ representation in local politics has been scarce. Many candidates faced harassment or voter skepticism about their qualifications. Today, however, advocates argue that lived experience fuels their credibility. “When someone says LGBTQ+ topics are ‘too mature’ for kids, I remind them that my existence isn’t inappropriate—it’s my reality,” says Maria Gonzalez, a lesbian mother elected to her Nevada school board last year.
These candidates are also leveraging grassroots strategies. Social media campaigns, community storytelling events, and partnerships with organizations like the Victory Fund have helped them reach voters without relying on traditional (and often costly) political networks. In rural areas, where LGBTQ+ visibility is lower, candidates emphasize shared values like fairness and student safety. “I talk about my background as a teacher, not just my identity,” explains Ethan Carter, a gay educator running in Iowa. “Parents care about who’s qualified to keep their kids’ schools strong.”
Overcoming Backlash
Campaigns aren’t without risks. LGBTQ+ candidates frequently face vitriolic attacks, from smear campaigns accusing them of “grooming” students to protests at campaign events. In Tennessee, candidate Marquez Smith received threatening messages after advocating for a policy to respect students’ chosen pronouns. “The hate is exhausting, but it’s also proof that we’re challenging the status quo,” Smith says.
Legal threats also loom. In some states, new laws allow parents to sue districts over curriculum content or healthcare referrals for transgender students. Critics argue these measures create a hostile environment for LGBTQ+ officials. “How can you serve effectively when every vote is scrutinized for ‘hidden agendas’?” asks Dr. Lisa Nguyen, a school board member in Georgia.
Success Stories and Systemic Change
Despite obstacles, LGBTQ+ candidates are winning races—and making tangible differences. In Wisconsin, newly elected board member Aisha Patel helped reinstate a LGBTQ+ student club after it was defunded. In Oregon, a majority-LGBTQ+ board coalition passed training programs to reduce bullying. These victories often inspire others: When 24-year-old Diego Ramirez won his race in New Mexico, three more queer candidates announced runs in neighboring districts.
Importantly, their impact extends beyond policy. Visibility matters. For students like 16-year-old Kai Thompson, seeing an openly transgender board member visit their school was transformative. “It made me feel like I belong here,” Kai says. “Like my voice could matter someday too.”
The Road Ahead
The surge in LGBTQ+ school board candidates reflects a larger truth: Local politics are deeply personal. As national debates over identity and education grow louder, these leaders are proving that representation isn’t just symbolic—it’s a practical tool for change. Their campaigns prioritize dialogue over division, whether by hosting town halls on inclusive curricula or collaborating with wary parents on anti-bullying measures.
Yet the fight is far from over. With 2024 elections approaching, groups on both sides are preparing for fierce contests. For LGBTQ+ candidates, the goal remains clear: to ensure schools remain safe spaces for all students, regardless of their identities. As Jamie Wilson puts it, “This isn’t about politics. It’s about making sure kids can walk into school feeling seen, respected, and ready to learn.”
In an era of polarization, these candidates are redefining what leadership looks like—one classroom, one policy, and one election at a time.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » How LGBTQ+ Candidates Are Reshaping Local School Boards Amid National Debates