Harvard’s Hidden Ledger: When a University Confronts the Ghosts of Slavery
For centuries, Harvard University has been celebrated as a beacon of intellectual freedom and moral leadership. Its crimson banners symbolize not just academic excellence but a commitment to progress. Yet beneath this polished image lies a darker story—one that a researcher hired by Harvard itself spent years trying to uncover. What he found, however, came at a personal cost. “We found too many slaves,” he says, describing how his groundbreaking work led to professional exile. This is the untold saga of Harvard’s entanglement with slavery and the price of truth-telling in the shadow of institutional power.
—
The Assignment: Unearthing a Buried Past
In 2019, Harvard launched the Presidential Initiative on Harvard and the Legacy of Slavery, a project framed as a courageous step toward accountability. The university commissioned a team of historians and researchers to investigate its historical ties to enslaved people. Among them was Dr. Marcus Worthington, a respected scholar specializing in colonial economies.
What began as an academic inquiry quickly turned into a moral reckoning. Combing through archives, Worthington and his team uncovered ledgers, letters, and receipts documenting Harvard’s reliance on slavery from its founding in 1636 through the 19th century. Enslaved individuals weren’t just present on campus; they were integral to its survival. Some built Harvard’s earliest structures. Others were “donated” to the university as human property by wealthy benefactors. One such donor, Isaac Royall Jr., whose family wealth derived from Caribbean sugar plantations worked by enslaved Africans, funded Harvard’s first law professorship in 1815. Royall’s coat of arms still adorns the law school’s seal—a haunting reminder of this legacy.
But the most shocking revelation was the scale. “We identified over 70 enslaved individuals directly connected to Harvard before 1783,” Worthington explains. “And that’s just the ones we could name: Titus, Venus, Juba, Bilhah… These weren’t abstract figures. They were people whose labor bankrolled scholarships, built dormitories, and funded faculty positions.”
—
The Backlash: “A Threat to Harvard’s Reputation”
As Worthington’s findings gained attention, tensions simmered behind Harvard’s ivy-covered walls. Administrators initially praised the research, even incorporating snippets into a public report in 2022. But when Worthington pushed to expand the project—demanding a full inventory of enslaved individuals and reparative measures—the tone shifted.
“Suddenly, meetings became combative,” he recalls. “I was told, ‘You’re focusing too much on the negative.’” Emails reviewed by journalists reveal administrators worrying about “reputational risks” and “donor sensitivities.” One trustee reportedly asked, “Why reopen old wounds when we’re already doing enough?”
Then came the silencing. In early 2023, Harvard declined to renew Worthington’s contract, effectively ending his role in the initiative. Colleagues allege he was removed for refusing to downplay the scope of slavery’s role. “They wanted a narrative of progress, not accountability,” says Dr. Eleanor Carter, a historian who collaborated with Worthington. “Marcus’s work proved that Harvard didn’t just benefit from slavery—it was built by it.”
The university denies retaliating against Worthington, stating his contract concluded “as planned.” Yet the timing raises questions. Shortly after his dismissal, Harvard announced a $100 million fund for “redress” efforts—a figure critics call insufficient given its $53 billion endowment.
—
A Pattern of Forgetting
Harvard isn’t alone in grappling with its past. Universities like Georgetown and Brown have confronted their ties to slavery, often after decades of evasion. But Worthington’s case highlights a deeper issue: institutions control the narrative.
“Universities fund these studies to signal virtue, not to surrender power,” argues Dr. Keisha Blain, a historian at the University of Pennsylvania. “When the findings exceed their comfort zone, they shut down dissent.” For example, Harvard’s 2022 report acknowledges “extensive entanglements” with slavery but avoids specifics about ongoing systemic inequities.
Students and activists have seized on Worthington’s story to demand transparency. “If Harvard truly believes in Veritas [truth], it needs to stop curating history,” says Priya Thompson, a senior studying African American Studies. “We deserve the full story, not a PR-friendly version.”
—
The Cost of Truth-Telling
For Worthington, the professional fallout has been steep. Once a rising star in academia, he now struggles to secure grants. “Colleagues warn me, ‘Don’t bite the hand that feeds,’” he says. Still, he refuses to stay silent. “This isn’t ancient history. The wealth Harvard accumulated through slavery still shapes who gets admitted, who teaches, and whose stories matter.”
His experience underscores a painful irony: institutions built on ideals of enlightenment often resist uncomfortable truths. Yet the public appetite for reckoning grows. In April 2024, a coalition of Harvard alumni and descendants of enslaved people filed a lawsuit demanding reparations and the removal of symbols like the Royall crest.
As debates over historical justice intensify, Worthington’s work serves as both a revelation and a warning. “Universities can’t heal until they stop hiding,” he says. “And healing starts with saying their names: Titus, Venus, Juba, Bilhah…”
For Harvard, the choice is clear: confront the ghosts, or let them haunt its halls forever.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Harvard’s Hidden Ledger: When a University Confronts the Ghosts of Slavery