Harvard’s Hidden History: A Researcher’s Quest to Expose Slavery’s Legacy—and Its Cost
For centuries, Harvard University has been celebrated as a beacon of intellectual progress and liberal ideals. Yet beneath its ivy-covered walls lies a story the institution long avoided telling—one entangled with the brutality of slavery. In 2019, Harvard made headlines by commissioning an independent researcher to investigate its historical ties to enslaved people. What followed was a journey that unearthed uncomfortable truths, ignited controversy, and ultimately left the researcher claiming he was pushed out for revealing “too much.”
The Unsettling Assignment
The project began as part of Harvard’s broader effort to confront its past. Dozens of U.S. universities, including Brown, Georgetown, and Yale, had already launched similar initiatives to document their connections to slavery. Harvard’s president at the time, Drew Gilpin Faust, acknowledged the importance of “confronting the painful aspects of our history,” and the university appointed a historian to lead the investigation.
The researcher, whose identity remains confidential due to ongoing legal discussions, was tasked with scouring archives, financial records, and personal correspondence dating back to Harvard’s founding in 1636. What he discovered went far beyond isolated incidents. Slaves had not only been owned by early Harvard leaders but had also helped build the campus, maintain its operations, and fund its growth through donations linked to the slave trade.
“We found too many slaves,” the researcher later told journalists, summarizing the overwhelming evidence. His team identified over 70 enslaved individuals directly connected to Harvard’s first 150 years—a number that likely represents a fraction of the total, given gaps in historical documentation.
A Web of Complicity
The findings painted a stark picture. For example, the university’s first major benefactor, Isaac Royall Jr., inherited a fortune from his father’s Antiguan sugar plantation, which relied on enslaved labor. Royall’s donation helped establish Harvard Law School in 1817, and his family crest—featuring three sheaves of wheat—still appears on the school’s official seal. Other early donors included merchants who profited from the transatlantic slave trade, and university presidents, faculty, and staff were among those who enslaved people.
Perhaps most damning was evidence that Harvard’s investments in Southern industries, such as cotton and railroads, continued to benefit from slavery long after Massachusetts abolished the practice in 1783. The institution’s growth, the researcher argued, was “inextricably linked to human bondage.”
Silence and Suppression?
As the research progressed, tensions reportedly grew between the researcher and Harvard administrators. He claimed his requests for additional resources and transparency were denied, and drafts of his report were allegedly edited to downplay the scale of involvement. In 2022, his contract was abruptly terminated.
Harvard has denied accusations of censorship, stating the decision was based on “budgetary considerations” and that the project was later reassigned to another team. However, critics argue the university’s actions reflect a pattern of reluctance to fully confront its past. A spokesperson emphasized that Harvard remains “committed to sharing these findings publicly,” but the researcher’s experience raises questions about institutional accountability.
A Broader Reckoning
The controversy mirrors challenges faced by other institutions. When Georgetown University revealed in 2016 that it had sold 272 enslaved people to pay off debts, it pledged reparations and renamed buildings. Similarly, Princeton removed Woodrow Wilson’s name from its public policy school due to his racist views. Yet Harvard’s approach has been criticized as slower and less concrete.
The researcher’s unfinished work has since been folded into Harvard’s larger Legacy of Slavery initiative, which includes a public report, a memorial, and a $100 million fund for reparative programs. Still, some argue these measures lack teeth. The fund, for instance, focuses on educational partnerships rather than direct payments to descendants of enslaved people linked to Harvard.
Why This Matters Today
Understanding institutions’ ties to slavery isn’t just about correcting historical records—it’s about addressing enduring inequalities. As Harvard’s own report notes, the “benefits derived from slavery helped sustain the university well into the 19th century,” contributing to its wealth and prestige. Meanwhile, descendants of enslaved people faced systemic barriers to accessing the same opportunities.
Students and activists have pushed for more aggressive reforms, from reparations to curriculum changes. “You can’t claim to value diversity while ignoring how your wealth was built,” said one undergraduate protester in 2023.
The Cost of Truth-Telling
The researcher’s story underscores the risks of challenging powerful institutions. While Harvard maintains it supports academic freedom, his experience suggests that uncovering inconvenient truths can come at a personal cost. “This wasn’t just about history,” he said. “It was about holding Harvard accountable in the present.”
His work has already inspired similar investigations at other universities, proving that even incomplete efforts can spark change. Yet the backlash he faced serves as a reminder: institutions often prioritize their reputations over reconciliation.
Moving Forward
Harvard now faces a choice. Will it continue to acknowledge its past in piecemeal fashion, or will it take bold steps to address the harms it perpetuated? For descendants like Karen Smith (a pseudonym), whose ancestors were enslaved by a Harvard donor, the answer is clear. “An apology isn’t enough,” she said. “Justice means giving back what was stolen.”
As debates over reparations and historical memory intensify nationwide, Harvard’s journey offers a cautionary tale. The road to accountability is fraught with resistance, but as the researcher’s findings show, silence only deepens the wounds.
In the end, his greatest discovery may be this: a university’s commitment to truth matters most when it hurts.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Harvard’s Hidden History: A Researcher’s Quest to Expose Slavery’s Legacy—and Its Cost