Beyond the Bard: Rethinking Shakespeare’s Place in Modern Classrooms
For generations, the name Shakespeare has been synonymous with literary education. His works sit proudly on required reading lists, dissected line-by-line in countless high school English classes. Yet, a growing chorus of students, educators, and cultural critics are asking a pivotal question: Is the immense focus on Shakespearean texts and language still serving our students, or has it become an unquestioned tradition blocking the door to more relevant literary experiences?
The arguments for teaching Shakespeare are well-rehearsed: unparalleled influence on the English language, timeless themes, cultural literacy. There’s undeniable truth here. Phrases like “wild goose chase,” “break the ice,” or “heart of gold” pepper our speech thanks to him. Exploring ambition in Macbeth or young love in Romeo and Juliet connects us to fundamental human experiences.
However, the reality in today’s diverse, fast-paced classrooms often tells a different story:
1. The Language Barrier is Real (and Demotivating): Let’s be honest – Early Modern English is a barrier. For many students, especially those for whom English isn’t a first language or who struggle with reading comprehension, grappling with “doth,” “thou,” and intricate Elizabethan syntax isn’t just challenging – it’s actively alienating. Hours are spent deciphering basic meaning, often with the aid of “No Fear Shakespeare” translations, leaving little energy or enthusiasm left for appreciating themes, character development, or the beauty of the language itself. The initial struggle often overshadows any potential reward, turning literature into a chore rather than a joy.
2. Relevance Gap: While themes like love, power, and jealousy are universal, the specific social structures, historical contexts, and cultural norms of Shakespeare’s world feel increasingly distant to 21st-century teenagers. The intricate politics of the Danish court in Hamlet or the strict societal rules governing Much Ado About Nothing can seem abstract and unrelatable. Students often struggle to see themselves in these stories or connect them meaningfully to the complex issues they navigate daily – issues of identity, technology, systemic inequality, and global challenges that Shakespeare couldn’t have conceived of. Does exploring Othello’s jealousy resonate more powerfully than exploring similar themes in a contemporary novel dealing with social media and modern relationships?
3. Monopoly on “Classic” Status: The sheer weight given to Shakespeare inevitably crowds out other vital voices and perspectives. The literary canon taught in schools remains overwhelmingly white, male, and Eurocentric. Devoting significant chunks of curriculum time to Shakespeare means less time for:
Diverse Classics: Works by authors of color (e.g., Toni Morrison, Chinua Achebe, Zora Neale Hurston), women writers (e.g., Virginia Woolf, Mary Shelley, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie), or writers from non-Western traditions offer different lenses on the human condition and reflect the experiences of a far wider range of students.
Modern & Contemporary Voices: Literature didn’t stop in 1616. Brilliant, relevant authors are writing now, tackling current issues with language and contexts students immediately understand. Ignoring these voices in favor of centuries-old texts sends a message about whose stories are deemed most important.
Other Forms of Literary Excellence: The focus on Shakespearean drama can overshadow poetry, non-fiction, short stories, and diverse genres that might resonate more deeply with different learners.
What Gets Lost When Shakespeare is Mandatory?
Joy of Reading: When literature is primarily associated with difficulty and decoding, students are less likely to develop a genuine love for reading for pleasure. They might learn to analyze Shakespeare, but do they learn to love literature?
Critical Thinking Applied Elsewhere: The analytical skills honed on Shakespeare are valuable. But could they be developed equally well, or even better, by analyzing complex contemporary texts, exploring persuasive techniques in modern media, or debating ethical dilemmas in current events?
Connections to Student Identity: Curriculum should reflect and validate the diverse identities and backgrounds of students. An over-reliance on Shakespeare makes this difficult, potentially reinforcing a sense of exclusion or irrelevance.
Moving Forward: Not Abolishing, But Rebalancing
This isn’t necessarily a call to ban Shakespeare. His influence is undeniable, and there is value in cultural touchstones. However, it is a call for a critical reevaluation of his place:
1. Elective, Not Universal Mandate: Offer Shakespeare as a deep-dive elective for students genuinely fascinated by his work or historical literature, rather than forcing it upon everyone. Make room for choice.
2. Contextualize, Don’t Idolize: When taught, integrate Shakespeare within a broader historical and literary context. Acknowledge the language barrier explicitly and use strategies to minimize frustration. Compare and contrast his themes and techniques with works from other eras and cultures.
3. Expand the Canon Dramatically: Actively prioritize diversifying the literature curriculum. Include classics from global perspectives and integrate significant contemporary works that speak directly to modern life. Ensure students encounter a rich tapestry of human experience through literature.
4. Focus on Skills, Not Just Texts: Shift the emphasis from mastering specific texts to mastering transferable skills: critical analysis, understanding narrative structure, identifying themes and symbolism, appreciating figurative language, and forming evidence-based arguments. These skills can be developed using a wide range of engaging materials.
5. Student Centered Learning: Listen to student feedback and interests. What kinds of stories excite them? What issues do they care about? Use this to inform text selection, making literature feel vital and connected to their world.
The goal of literature education shouldn’t be to produce students who can quote Hamlet’s soliloquy, but to cultivate critical thinkers, empathetic readers, and individuals who find meaning and connection in the written word. Shakespeare can be a part of that journey for some, but clinging to his texts as an unquestioned cornerstone of literary education risks alienating students and narrowing their literary horizons. It’s time to move beyond the Bard as the default, and embrace a richer, more diverse, and more relevant literary landscape in our classrooms. The future of engaged readers depends on it. Let’s open the curriculum windows wide.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Beyond the Bard: Rethinking Shakespeare’s Place in Modern Classrooms