Anyone Here Familiar with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Field? Let’s Demystify It!
That question – “Anyone here familiar with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL)?” – pops up in faculty lounges, academic conferences, and online forums dedicated to education. Sometimes it’s met with enthusiastic nods, sometimes puzzled expressions, and often a mix of both. So, what exactly is this field that sounds simultaneously scholarly and intensely practical? If you’re curious, intrigued, or maybe even a bit skeptical, let’s dive in and unpack the world of SoTL.
At its heart, the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) is about taking the same rigorous, inquisitive, and evidence-based approach we apply to our academic disciplines and turning it towards our own teaching practice and student learning. Think of it this way: just as a biologist studies living organisms or a historian analyzes primary sources, SoTL practitioners systematically investigate questions about how learning happens in their classrooms and what teaching strategies most effectively foster that learning.
It’s more than just being a good teacher (though that’s essential!). It’s about moving beyond anecdote and instinct to engage in a scholarly process:
1. Asking Meaningful Questions: What specific aspect of teaching or learning do I want to understand better? (e.g., “Does using case studies in my intro sociology course improve students’ ability to apply theory?” or “How does peer feedback impact writing quality in my engineering design class?”).
2. Investigating Systematically: Designing a thoughtful approach to explore that question. This might involve gathering evidence like student work, surveys, interviews, classroom observations, pre/post tests, or analyzing existing course data – using methodologies appropriate to the question and context.
3. Analyzing Evidence: Critically examining the data collected. What patterns emerge? What do the findings suggest? This step requires careful thought and often involves collaboration.
4. Sharing Findings & Reflecting: Making the results public – through presentations, publications, department meetings, or online platforms – inviting peer review, critique, and discussion. Crucially, this sharing allows others to build upon the work.
5. Applying Insights: Using what’s learned to inform and improve future teaching practices, course design, and ultimately, enhance student learning outcomes.
Why Does SoTL Matter? The Power of Evidence-Informed Practice
You might wonder, “Isn’t this just common sense good teaching?” While effective teachers often intuitively use good practices, SoTL adds a crucial layer:
Bridging the Theory-Practice Gap: It directly connects educational research (often seen as abstract) with the messy reality of actual classrooms and diverse student populations. SoTL asks, “What works here, for these students, in this context?”
Moving Beyond Anecdote: Instead of relying solely on “This worked well last semester,” SoTL provides concrete evidence. It helps answer “How do I know it worked?” and “For whom did it work best?”
Fostering Reflective Practice: It encourages teachers to be continuous learners about their own profession. It cultivates a mindset of curiosity and continuous improvement.
Building a Shared Knowledge Base: When SoTL work is shared, it contributes to a collective understanding of effective teaching and learning across disciplines and institutions. Your findings in a biology lab can inform a colleague teaching studio art.
Professionalizing Teaching: In higher education especially, where faculty are often hired for research expertise, SoTL provides a framework for recognizing teaching as intellectual work worthy of scholarly inquiry and reward.
Improving Student Outcomes: Ultimately, this is the core goal. By understanding learning better and refining teaching based on evidence, SoTL aims to create more effective, engaging, and equitable learning experiences that lead to deeper understanding and student success.
SoTL in Action: What Does it Look Like Across Disciplines?
The beauty of SoTL is its adaptability. It’s not confined to education departments; it thrives in every discipline. Here are a few glimpses:
History: A professor investigates the impact of incorporating digital archives and mapping tools into a research methods course on students’ historical analysis skills and engagement.
Chemistry: An instructor studies whether flipping the classroom (students review lecture material before class) allows for more effective problem-solving and conceptual discussion during lab time, leading to better exam performance.
Nursing: Faculty collaborate to assess the effectiveness of a new simulation scenario in developing clinical judgment and communication skills among students, comparing it to traditional methods.
Literature: A professor examines how structured peer-review workshops impact the quality of students’ final essays and their ability to critically evaluate writing.
Engineering: A team explores whether introducing reflective journaling alongside complex design projects improves students’ metacognitive awareness (understanding their own thinking process) and problem-solving approaches.
Challenges and Considerations in SoTL
Engaging in SoTL isn’t without hurdles:
Time: Finding the time for systematic inquiry amidst heavy teaching loads, research obligations, and service commitments is a significant challenge.
Expertise: Faculty are experts in their disciplines, but may not have extensive training in educational research methodologies. Collaboration with colleagues in education or seeking professional development is often key.
Resources: Access to support (like teaching centers), funding for projects, or technological tools can vary.
Institutional Recognition: While growing, SoTL work isn’t always valued equally with disciplinary research in tenure and promotion decisions, though this is changing.
Ethics & IRB: Ensuring ethical treatment of students (confidentiality, voluntary participation) is paramount. Navigating Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirements for human subjects research can be complex.
Defining “Evidence”: What counts as valid evidence in SoTL? It often involves mixed methods and context-specific data, which can differ from traditional disciplinary research expectations.
Getting Started with SoTL: You Don’t Need a PhD in Education
Feeling intrigued but overwhelmed? Start small and focused:
1. Identify a Burning Question: What’s one persistent challenge or curiosity in your teaching? Frame it as a specific, investigable question.
2. Talk to Colleagues: Find others interested – within your department, across campus, or online. SoTL thrives on collaboration and dialogue.
3. Seek Support: Check if your institution has a Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). These centers often offer workshops, consultations, grants, and communities of practice for SoTL.
4. Start Simple: Your first project doesn’t need to be a massive controlled experiment. Could you compare student performance on similar assignments before and after a small change? Analyze patterns in mid-semester feedback? Conduct brief, anonymous student surveys?
5. Read & Learn: Explore existing SoTL literature in your discipline (journals like Teaching Sociology, Journal of Chemical Education, or multidisciplinary journals like International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning). See what others have done.
6. Share Early and Often: Present initial findings at a department meeting, a teaching conference, or a CTL event. Feedback is invaluable.
So, Anyone Familiar with SoTL?
Hopefully, by now, you have a clearer picture! The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning is an invitation. It’s an invitation for educators to bring their intellectual curiosity and scholarly rigor to bear on the core mission of our work: fostering student learning. It’s about moving beyond “This worked for me” to “Here’s what we learned about how and why this works, and how others might adapt it.” It’s a vibrant, growing field dedicated to making teaching not just an art, but a scholarly practice grounded in evidence and shared inquiry. Whether you’re a seasoned SoTL practitioner or just starting to explore, there’s a place for you in this conversation. So, the next time someone asks, “Anyone here familiar with SoTL?”, you might just find yourself jumping in with your own questions and insights. Let’s keep the conversation – and the scholarship – going.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Anyone Here Familiar with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Field