What Happened to Physics Class? Why Teens Check Out and How Parents and Teachers Can Bring It Back
Last month, I sat at a cracked lab table in the back of my daughter Mia’s tenth-grade physics class. The lights went down before the late bell finished ringing. A voice on a screen moved through slides about velocity, acceleration, and force. Students typed fill-in-the-blank notes while rain streaked the windows and a half-eaten bag of pretzels sat next to someone’s laptop.
Then came the worksheet.
A boy in a gray hoodie looked up. “Do we just use the triangle?”
A girl beside him shrugged. “I type the numbers into ChatGPT and copy the equation it uses.”
After class, Mia leaned against the lockers and said, “Physics isn’t about the world. It’s about memorizing when to plug stuff in.”
That stuck with me. I remembered physics class as ramps, carts, pulleys, and arguments about whether a heavier ball really falls faster. But for many students now, it is a fast-moving sequence of videos, note packets, online quizzes, and formula sheets. They may see the symbols, but they never quite connect them to anything they can touch or see.
I volunteered in the class a few days later during a lab on motion. Groups wheeled small carts up ramps and recorded times. Several students spent more time asking whether their numbers “looked right” than watching the cart. One group had perfectly neat data but could not tell me whether their cart had moved at constant speed or sped up. When I asked, “What did you actually see?” one girl said, “I don’t know. The answer’s supposed to be around 0.8.”
This is the quiet problem in a lot of physics classrooms. Students are taught to answer before they have learned to notice.
Physics asks the brain to do several things at once: understand a real event, draw a diagram, choose variables, translate those variables into algebra, keep track of units, and decide whether the answer makes sense. For many fourteen- to sixteen-year-olds, that kind of abstract thinking is still developing. If they never get a clear picture of the event, the equation becomes a magic spell. They remember that F = ma, but they do not know what force, mass, or acceleration look like in front of them.
Mia ran into this while doing homework at the kitchen table. The problem described a block being pulled across a rough table by a string. She had four numbers written down and three equations circled, but she had not drawn anything.
I folded the worksheet so only the description showed. “Forget the formula for a second,” I said. “What is happening?”
She sighed. “A block is being pulled.”
“By what?”
“A string.”
“What else is touching it?”
“The table.”
I pushed a napkin toward her. “Draw the block. Show the pulls and pushes.”
She drew a square, an arrow for the string, and another arrow for friction. Then she paused and added gravity and the table pushing upward. The drawing was rough, but it gave her a way into the problem. After that, the equation did not feel random. The block sped up because the pull was larger than friction. She still mixed up a sign later, but she could explain why.
That small shift works because it follows the order in which physics actually makes sense: event, picture, words, then symbols. Parents can use it at home without knowing the subject themselves. When a student is stuck, try asking, “What object are we looking at?” “What is happening at the beginning?” “What changes?” and “Which way is it moving?” Cover the answer choices or equation list for two minutes if needed. A simple drawing with arrows often clears up more than a repeated explanation.
Teachers can make the same adjustment in small ways. Instead of beginning a unit with definitions, start with a ninety-second event: a cart hits a book, two cans roll down a ramp, a crumpled paper and flat paper fall side by side. Ask students, “What did you notice?” before introducing vocabulary. Keep the diagram style the same for several lessons so students have a stable visual language. A twelve-problem worksheet can become six problems, each requiring one sentence explaining what is happening before the calculation.
I talked with Mia’s teacher, Ms. Reyes, after school one afternoon. She was not unaware of the problem. Her desk was covered in quiz printouts and a pacing guide. She explained that motion, forces, energy, waves, and electricity all had to be covered before the state assessment. When quiz scores dropped, she had added more worked examples, which took time away from labs. She was trying to rescue grades, but the rescue had made the class feel more mechanical.
She agreed to try a few changes for two weeks. Tuesdays began with a short demonstration and one prediction question. One problem each class was solved together using the same sequence: sketch, label, write a sentence, then calculate. Quizzes still had numerical problems, but one item asked students to explain their reasoning in words instead of producing an answer. She did not abandon the videos entirely; she posted them for absent students and review rather than using them as the main introduction.
After three weeks, the change was modest. Some students still reached for their phones the moment they felt uncertain. One lab group spent ten minutes arguing about whether a swinging washer was accelerating at the bottom of its path, which was at least a real argument. Mia came home and said, “We watched a cart crash into a book, and then we had to say why it stopped.” She did not sound thrilled, but she sounded like she had participated in something.
That may be the realistic goal, not a sudden love of science.
At home, we now keep Mia’s phone across the room during physics homework, not as a punishment but because the work needs sustained attention. We use a twenty-minute timer, and she takes a real break afterward. When she says, “I don’t get it,” I usually answer, “Tell me the story first.” Sometimes the story is wrong. Sometimes I have to look up the definition with her. But she is less likely to sit frozen, waiting for the right formula to appear.
Parents can also email a teacher with a specific observation rather than a general worry. A note like, “Mia can choose equations but struggles to explain when they fit. Could she redo one problem with a diagram and a written explanation for partial credit?” gives teachers something usable. Many are open to it because they know symbol-matching is not the same as understanding.
Physics class does not have to become a perfect workshop of wonder. Teachers are working under real pressure, and students arrive with uneven algebra skills, distraction, and years of experience guessing what teachers want. But the subject becomes accessible again when students are allowed to look first, describe what they see, and then reach for the math.
Last week, Mia worked on a force problem at the counter while I made toast. She started to ask, “Is this right?” then stopped and drew a diagram. She frowned, changed an arrow, and said, “Wait, friction should point the other way because the block’s moving right.”
I did not say anything. She still had not found the final answer, and part of the worksheet would probably confuse her the next day. But for a minute, she was watching an invisible block move across an imaginary table and thinking through what was happening.
That may not be the physics class I remember, but it was a place to start.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Happened to Physics Class