How Post and Comment Approval Changed Our Class Blog—and Why I’m Keeping the New Flair
On Sunday night, I sat at the kitchen table with my laptop and a mug of tea that had gone cold. I was working through the pending posts queue for our class blog. There were nineteen items: twelve posts and seven comments. One post was a photo of someone’s dog. Another had a subject line that said, “i have a question.” Then I clicked on a comment under a book review. It read: “ur video was so boring i fell asleep.”
I didn’t get angry. I just clicked “deny” and wrote a private note to the student: “Please put yourself in the writer’s shoes before you hit send.”
Then I added an eighth—wait.
Actually, this approval queue was something I had fought at first. Last year, when our fourth-grade class started using a blog to post book reviews, science observations, and project updates, I had told the platform: no approval needed. Let them post. I wanted to give them a real audience, and that meant trusting them with real publishing. The first week went fine. The second week, a boy posted “I’m bored” with no punctuation and a comment thread under it turned into a back-and-forth about whose handwriting was messy. I spent an entire afternoon deleting comments and sending emails home.
So I turned on post approval and comment approval. It felt a bit like giving up on openness, but I told the kids we were going to act like a real newspaper. If you publish something, an editor sees it first. That became our routine.
The approval works like this: a student writes a post, hits submit, and it lands in a queue. Then I look at it, sometimes approve it, sometimes send it back with a note. Comments go through the same process. When the platform added the new flair feature, I was skeptical at first. Flair was a little dropdown label you could attach to a post—”Question,” “Discovery,” “Book Talk,” “Help Needed,” “Shoutout.” It sounded like extra decoration. But it turned out to be one of the most useful tools we have.
The flair makes them decide what they are trying to do before they actually say anything. That might sound small, but for nine-year-olds, it’s huge. A child who picks “Question” has to think: do I actually have a question, and what is it? A child who picks “Discovery” has to ask themselves whether they saw, found, or noticed something worth sharing. The label doesn’t have to be perfect. It just forces a tiny moment of intention.
I saw that happen with Riley. She submitted a post early in the year that said, “I found something weird in the park.” She chose the “Question” flair. When I looked at it, I couldn’t tell what she was asking. So I sent it back with a private note: “What did you find, and what do you want to know about it?” She came in the next morning with a photo of a greyish shape growing on a fallen tree. She had labeled the photo: “Is this fungus or moss?” The post became a short observation about the difference between moss and lichen, and the class ended up looking at lichen under a magnifying glass on our next nature walk. Without the flair, she might have posted a vague sentence and gotten two comments and a “K” and moved on. The label made her clarify her own thought first.
The comment approval does something similar, but it works slower. That slowness is actually the point.
Marcus submitted a comment on a classmate’s science video. The comment said, “this is dumb.” It sat in the queue. I pulled him aside the next morning, not during class with everyone else, just at the door before the bell. I showed him his comment on my screen and asked, “Would you say that to her in person?” He shook his head. I said, “What changed when you typed it?” He shrugged. Then I opened a blank comment box and asked, “What did you actually want to tell her about the video?” He thought about it and said, “The part where she measured the shadow was pretty cool.” So that’s what he wrote, with a capital letter and a period. He clicked submit. I approved it and let it go through.
That’s the part I didn’t expect: approval isn’t just a filter. It’s a conversation. The queue gives me a quiet moment to ask a student what they meant before their words go out into the world. For kids who type before they think, that pause is everything.
Parents have appreciated it too, once they saw it in action. A mom wrote me an email after a school tour was canceled and a student posted about it in the blog. Her daughter had typed a long venting post about how unfair it was and had almost clicked publish. But because it went to my queue first, I had time to email the mom, and she was able to talk to her daughter about frustration before thirty kids saw the message and turned it into a group complaint. The girl rewrote it as a more reasonable note: “I’m sad the tour was canceled. I hope we can go later in the year.” She still said what she felt, but she said it without lighting the classroom on fire.
Now, I’ll be honest. The system isn’t perfect. I still spend part of every Sunday evening looking at a queue. Some posts are still off-topic. One kid submitted a picture of his lunch under “Shoutout,” and another tried to tag every comment with the “Help Needed” flair just to get my attention. I still can’t explain all the ways kids will find to use a new button. But the approval hasn’t made the blog dull. If anything, it’s made it more useful because the posts that do go up are more likely to mean something.
The flair has also made my life easier in a practical way. When I log on to approve posts, I can sort by flair. If I want to answer questions, I click the “Question” tab. If I need to find student work to show at a parent meeting, I can filter by “Book Talk” or “Discovery.” It takes five seconds. The kids also know that “Help Needed” posts get answered faster, so they’re learning to use labels strategically. That’s a real-world skill, even if it sounds like a small thing.
I don’t know if we’ll keep the approval queue forever. Maybe by fifth grade, most of these kids can post without me checking every word. But right now, they’re nine and ten years old. They’re still learning that the person on the other side of the screen is a person. A little waiting time helps with that.
This week, one student submitted a comment under another child’s post about a failed science experiment. The comment said, “Good try. It looked like a volcano but not really.” I almost approved it because the tone was fine. But there was a small edge to it, a “not really” that would have stung. So I sent it back and wrote, “Can you say the encouraging part without the jab?” She came back with, “Good try. The color was cool.” That one I approved.
The kitchen was quiet. The tea was cold. But the comment was safe to publish. I closed my laptop and realized that was exactly what I was supposed to do: hold the door open just long enough for kids to decide what kind of digital neighbors they want to be. We’re not all the way there yet. But we’re practicing.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » How Post and Comment Approval Changed Our Class Blog—and Why I’m Keeping the New Flair