The first time I actually let a student decide who got to speak in class, I almost took the badge back. We were mid-discussion about a short story, and the sixth-grader holding the small, laminated square in his hand—our new “flair”—was staring at the sea of raised hands like he was trying to read a menu in a dark restaurant. He picked a kid in the back who always snickered at the word “fertilizer,” and I felt my chest tighten.
For years, I ran my classroom the way my own teachers did. Students raised their hands, I picked someone, and the conversation moved at a pace I controlled. Every question was fielded, every tangent approved. It was safe. It was also exhausting, and I noticed the same eight kids did all the talking while everyone else watched.
The “flair” idea came from a simple problem: I was tired of being the gatekeeper. I wanted to see what would happen if students approved each other’s comments for a change. So I made a small batch of badges—just cardstock in a plastic sleeve with a clip on the back—and passed them out to three students at the start of each conversation-based lesson. The rule was basic: if you were holding the flair, you called on the next person to speak. You kept it until I noticed someone hadn’t talked in a while, then you passed it to them.
The first week was messy. Kids waved the badge like a magic wand. They called on their friends. They forgot to pass it. One kid hid it inside his hoodie so he could keep choosing people. But I noticed something else, too: the conversation started to sound different. When a student gets to pick the next speaker, they pay more attention. They’re not just waiting for their turn to say something smart; they’re listening to decide who needs to be pulled in.
That’s the part that surprised me. I expected chaos, but what I got was a kind of karaoke-night caution. No one wants to be the person who calls on the class clown and derails the whole period. So they started choosing quieter kids. They started choosing people they knew would do well, not just their friends. One of my most talkative students, a boy named Malik, held the flair for a whole lesson and only picked kids who had not yet spoken. When I asked him why later, he shrugged and said, “I wanted to see what they’d say.”
We’d never told him to think that way. He just did, because the job required it.
There’s a version of this that works at home, too. My son’s school uses an app for parent communication, and it defaults to requiring my approval for every photo, comment, or direct message my son sends from his school-issued tablet. It was quick to disable the approval setting for comments once I realized what it was doing: he was writing everything with one eye on me, and not in a good way. He was editing himself before he could think. So we turned off the approvals and replaced them with a nightly five-minute check-in. I sit next to him while he scrolls through the group thread. I ask two questions, and only two: “What did you post today, and how did it land?” It’s lighter. He’s not writing for a censor anymore; he’s writing for a reader.
The classroom equivalent of that is the behavior contract. When someone grabs the flair and calls on the same person three times in a row, we don’t make a big deal. The next day, the student gets the badge, and before class I just whisper: “Maybe aim for someone who hasn’t had a chance yet.” That’s it. No lecture. The badge itself does the teaching. It’s the easiest differentiation tool I have, and it costs nothing.
The trouble with postmodern parenting is that you can’t just make a small mistake and fix it later. You have to think it through in advance. This is why the flair idea is useful for a parent, too. Not the comment approval part—the “new job” part. A child with a responsibility is a child who has to look at the world from the outside. When my son got an old camera to document our garden, he stopped stomping on the cucumbers. He had a job. He was no longer just a troublemaker in a garden; he was an observer. It’s the same muscle as the kid holding the flair in class. It’s the muscle that says, “I decide who gets heard, and that makes me think about who is not being heard.”
We’re still working out the kinks, of course. There are days when the flair gets forgotten in a book bag. There are days when the same three kids get picked, and I have to step in and hold the badge myself for a while. There are days when my son posts a YouTube comment that is too snarky, and we have to sit with it and talk about why it landed poorly. I don’t think we’ll ever get it perfectly clean.
But I’ve noticed that the best conversations in my classroom are the ones where I say the least. The kids talk to each other. They check each other. They mess up. They recover. One day, a girl holding the flair passed it to the boy next to her without saying anything out loud—just tapped his arm and handed it over. He looked at it, nodded, and continued the discussion. I had never shown them that move. They invented it together.
The approval settings in life are always going to be there. It’s the new flair that’s interesting—the thing you add, the small responsibility you extend. It turns out that when you give a kid a reason to listen carefully, they will. You don’t even have to grade it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The first time I actually let a student decide who got to speak in class, I almost took the badge back