Why Universities Always Avoid Responsibility (And What Parents Can Actually Do)
The advisor had a bowl of those tiny wrapped mints on her desk, the kind you only see in campus offices. She offered me one, and I took it because I didn’t know what else to do with my hands. My daughter sat beside me, quiet, her fingers twisting the strap on her backpack. The advisor was explaining, very politely, that universities “trust students to manage their own learning journey” and that my daughter was “the best advocate for her needs.”
I remember thinking: She has tried. She had emailed her calculus professor three separate times about the missing accommodation form. She had visited the disability office, which said they’d “send a letter.” The professor never responded. Then my daughter failed her first midterm, and suddenly the university’s answer was: “It’s the student’s responsibility.”
That meeting was the third time I’d been on campus that semester. The first was for orientation, the second to help move her into residence. I had brought questions to the residence staff about how roommates handle conflicts, and got a cheerful “that’s for them to work through together.” Now I was in front of an academic advisor, and the message was the same: not our problem.
What I didn’t understand then is that this isn’t a failure within universities. It is the design.
I’m a parent, not an education scholar, but I’ve spent enough time peeling back university layers to see how the system works. There are offices for everything, but no single office is actually in charge of a student’s success. The professor says accommodations are processed by disability services. Disability services says the professor needs to act on their letter. The dean’s office says it’s a teaching matter and teaching is the professor’s domain. The ombudsperson says they can facilitate discussion but not force anyone to talk. Everyone is technically responsible, which means no one is practically responsible.
The bigger issue is legal. Federal law like FERPA keeps parents out of a student’s records after age eighteen. That means I cannot call a professor and ask why my daughter’s missed the accommodations. My daughter has to file a release form, and even then, universities will often still speak vaguely because they’ve built a culture of protecting themselves at all costs. A professor who says “I made a mistake” could invite disciplinary action. A department that admits systemic problems could face lawsuits. So instead, they all use the same language: “student’s responsibility,” “self-advocacy,” “resource.” It’s a shell game with a confident tone.
But the real reason universities can’t be held accountable is that they are not like a school. In public education, there are federally mandated tests, IEPs, and a history of parents fighting for rights. In higher education, students are legally adults, and the relationship is contractual, not custodial. The university offers courses, and the student pays for them. If a student fails, the contract didn’t promise a passing grade. It only promised an opportunity to learn. That’s a very clean legal escape hatch.
I learned this after that meeting with the advisor, when I tried to push harder. I asked, “But what do we do if the professor never responds?” The advisor actually shrugged and said, “Perhaps your daughter should schedule an appointment with his department chair.”
It wasn’t a solution. It was just another layer.
The only thing that changed happened when I stopped trying to hold the university accountable and instead started working with my daughter on how to be disruptive in a polite, official way. I don’t mean yelling or complaining. I mean using the university’s own rules against itself.
The first shift was in how she wrote her emails. Instead of “I didn’t receive your answer, please let me know,” she started writing: “I’m requesting a written response within 48 hours per the university grievance policy outlined in the student handbook.” That got attention quickly.
The second shift was copying people. When she emailed her professor again, she cc’d the accommodation coordinator and the assistant dean of students. Not as a threat, but because, as I explained, “you’re just keeping everyone informed.” Professors suddenly replied within a day.
The third shift was requesting a formal meeting through the right channel. Not an appointment with the professor, but a filed request for a “academic concerns meeting” with the department chair. That forces the issue onto an agenda. The chair may be useless, but the meeting creates documentation. Universities move when there’s a paper trail that could become a lawsuit or a bad news story.
I also realized I had to train my daughter that self-advocacy is not one email. It’s a sustained, administrative act. It’s keeping a spreadsheet of names, dates, and who said what. It’s using exact phrases like “I am formally requesting” and “Please state the policy in writing.” It’s not being aggressive, just annoyingly precise.
That’s not a fair system. I’m not pretending it is. Students shouldn’t have to become mini-lawyers just to get the supports they’ve been promised. But telling a university they’re wrong doesn’t work. We tried that. It’s like shouting at a fog bank.
What I want other parents to know is this: you cannot hold a university accountable in the way you would a high school. But you can use your child’s status as a full participant in the bureaucracy to create pressure. The university will always say “the student’s responsibility” – but the student is allowed to have responsibilities that include demanding clear processes and written answers. That is the only honest path forward.
This past week, my daughter got her professor to reschedule her midterm with extra time. It required two university offices, one formally cc’d email, and a meeting that lasted twenty minutes longer than scheduled. The professor never acknowledged he had missed the accommodation form. But the new test date was written on an official email, so it counts.
I still think the university got away with something. They never apologized, never admitted any fault. But my daughter got her exam, and that was the outcome we actually needed. I no longer believe in making institutions feel shame. I believe in making them change behavior through their own tedious procedures. It’s not justice, exactly. It’s just the best that’s available. And for a parent, sometimes that’s enough. At least until your kid graduates and the whole saga becomes a story they tell at dinner.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Universities Always Avoid Responsibility (And What Parents Can Actually Do)