My Son Says He Hates His New Teacher: A Parent’s Slow Path to Understanding
I was sorting laundry when Leo, my seven-year-old, flopped onto the couch and said, “I don’t like my teacher. He’s mean.”
I paused, holding a sock. “Mean? What did he do?”
“He just is mean. I want a different one.” He pulled his hood up, a small sign I’d learned to read as serious displeasure.
This wasn’t a surprise. Two weeks into second grade, the change from Ms. Parker’s cozy, sticker-filled classroom to Mr. Alvarez’s more structured room had been a shock. But “mean” felt like a real accusation, not just a complaint about fewer recesses. My mind immediately spun through possibilities: a harsh word, a humiliating moment, some small injustice blown out of proportion.
“Did he yell at you?” I asked carefully.
“No,” Leo said. “He just always has us check our own work. And he makes us do math on whiteboards. And he doesn’t have a class pet. And he says ‘quiet’ all the time. And he never lets us sit where we want.”
Okay. So not a monster. Just a different style. But I didn’t say that to Leo. In that moment, the easy thing was to sympathize, to mutter something about how not all teachers are the same, to let him stew. But I knew from experience—both as a parent and from my own years in a classroom—that a child’s dislike of a teacher is not a small thing to ignore. It can shape how he shows up to school. It can turn mornings into a negotiation and homework into a battle. I needed to understand what was actually happening before I could help.
So I took the long route, in stages.
First, I just listened. Not with a notepad, but while we built a LEGO set. I asked open-ended questions without “why” attached—”What does a day with Mr. Alvarez actually look like?”—because “why” puts a child on the spot. He told me about the morning bell, the straight-line walk to the classroom, the way Mr. Alvarez would write a schedule on the board and then say “No more talking until we’re through.” He told me about a boy named Jalen who got a yellow card for tapping his pencil. He told me that at 2:30, they have “silent read time” and you can’t whisper about a book with your friend.
None of it sounded cruel. It sounded orderly. Mr. Alvarez was, from what I could piece together, running a tightly managed, low-noise classroom. For most of the kids, it was probably fine. For Leo, who is chatty and easily distracted and functions best with a little movement and conversation, it felt like a cage.
That was a crucial shift for me. His “I don’t like him” wasn’t really about the teacher as a person. It was about a mismatch between Leo’s temperament and the classroom atmosphere. But I knew if I explained that to Leo, it would sound like I was siding with Mr. Alvarez. So I kept quiet and took the next step.
I emailed Mr. Alvarez. I didn’t want to, because it felt like walking into a room with a complaint. But I didn’t lead with a complaint. I asked for context. I wrote something like: “Leo is still settling in. He tells me he struggles with silent reading and the whiteboard math. Could you share what you see during those times? I want to make sure we’re on the same page at home.”
He responded later that evening, which surprised me. His reply was calm and specific. He said Leo was actually fine with the whiteboard math—he just didn’t like getting up in front of the room to show his work. And silent reading time was a struggle because Leo would finish his book and then want to talk to neighbors. “I’m working on giving him more choices during that block,” he wrote. “Maybe he can have a graphic novel or draw quietly if he finishes.”
It was the word “choices” that relaxed me. He wasn’t a drill sergeant. He was a teacher noticing a kid and adapting. But I also knew that Mr. Alvarez wasn’t going to transform his whole class for my son. The real work was helping Leo see that he could handle a teacher who wasn’t his favorite.
So we started small at home. I told Leo, “Mr. Alvarez says you’re good at the math, just not when you have to stand up. That makes sense—I don’t like speaking in front of people either. Want to practice at home?” And we did. We set a timer for three minutes, and he pretended to be the teacher, showing me a math problem on our little whiteboard. It was awkward and he half-frowned, but after two tries, he said, “Okay, that’s not so bad if I know the answer.”
We also worked on the “finished my book” problem. Leo is a fast reader. I realized part of his tension during silent reading was boredom, not rebellion. So we went to the library and picked out an encyclopedia about dinosaurs and a longer chapter book. I gave him a little bookmark with a sticky note on it and told him, “When you finish, write down a fact you learned and hide it under your reading log. That’s your game.” It sounds silly, but it gave him a private task—something Mr. Alvarez hadn’t assigned, something that was his.
The biggest change came when I volunteered in the classroom one Tuesday for handwriting practice. It was the first time I saw Mr. Alvarez in action. He wasn’t mean. He was direct. He said things like, “Leo, sit with your feet on the floor.” He said “we don’t call out” twice. But he also crouched next to a girl who had dropped her pencil and said, “No worries, pick it up, let’s keep going.” He told one boy his cursive F was “really solid.” At the end of the block, he rang a small bell, and the class raised their hands instantly. It was impressive, actually. It was just quiet and orderly in a way Leo wasn’t used to.
I realized something else. I was primed to dislike Mr. Alvarez because my son disliked him. But the more I watched, the more I saw a teacher who wasn’t going to be Leo’s favorite, but who wasn’t the enemy either. There’s a difference. And part of my job is helping Leo see that difference without invalidating his feelings.
At dinner that night, I told Leo, “I saw your class today. Mr. Alvarez is kind of strict, huh?” Leo nodded, suspicious. “But you know,” I said, “he let everyone choose their own pencil color for their handwriting sheet. And he laughed when that kid from the back said the letter was ‘squiggly.’ Did you hear that?”
“Yeah, maybe,” Leo said, picking at his pasta.
I didn’t push further. But a few days later, Leo came home and said, “Mr. Alvarez taught us a trick for remembering the number seven by pretending it has a neck. It used to be fun for me to do it that way. I guess it’s okay.”
Not a love note. Not even a full endorsement. But enough. He still says at times that he wants a different teacher. He still sighs when he sees the math whiteboard come out. But he’s also stopped saying “I hate him.” The hatred was vague. The actual problems were concrete: public work, silent reading, no movement. We addressed the concrete parts. The vagueness dissolved.
What remains is a work in progress. I don’t know if Leo and Mr. Alvarez will ever have a warm relationship. They might not. Some teachers become cherished memories; others become lessons in handling a bossy or structured adult. That’s okay. The goal isn’t for Leo to love every person in charge. It’s for him to find a way to function in a room he doesn’t entirely like, to speak up about what he needs, and to learn that a teacher can be different without being bad.
This week, I still check in after school. I ask, “What was one thing Mr. Alvarez did that was fine?” Not “how was your day”—that’s too big. The question forces Leo to notice something small. Yesterday, he said, “He let me sit by Marcus for the science video.” That’s not enough to fix everything. But it’s a thread. And sometimes a thread is all you need to keep pulling a relationship forward.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » My Son Says He Hates His New Teacher: A Parent’s Slow Path to Understanding