My friend Sandra called me on a Tuesday afternoon, right in the middle of that exhausted hour when school pickups and work emails blur together. Her voice had that tight, clipped sound she gets when she’s been reheating her coffee for the third time. “Can I ask you something?” she said. “And be honest, because everyone else keeps telling me to be patient.”
She told me she’d found her son Derek’s laundry basket on the hallway landing again. The same one she’d asked him to take downstairs that morning. For the past four months, Derek, who is twenty-one, has been living in their finished basement. He dropped out of community college a year ago, lost his warehouse job in February, and has an unfortunate habit of treating the family home like an all-inclusive resort. He sleeps until noon. The dishes appear in the sink like magic. And whenever Sandra brings up job applications, he mutters something about “the market” or “systems” and disappears into his room with a bag of frozen french fries.
“I told him if he doesn’t start doing something by the end of the month, he has to find a new place to live,” she said. “But now I’m wondering if that’s too harsh. He’s my kid. What if he ends up on the street?” Then she asked the question that’s been sitting between us for weeks: “Should I actually kick him out?”
I didn’t answer right away. I poured myself a cup of tea and sat down at the kitchen counter. The truth is, I’ve been on both sides of this conversation. Ten years ago, I was the young adult sleeping in my parents’ spare room. I had a degree but no direction, and my mother did something that frightened me more than any lecture ever has. She sat me down one Sunday and said, “I’m not kicking you out. But we’re going to start paying rent.” It was a small amount, two hundred dollars a month, but it changed everything. That simple, steady expectation gave me a reason to get out of bed. I washed dishes at a diner just to cover it. Eventually, I figured out the rest.
I’ve also seen the alternative. When I was teaching, I had a student whose older brother was living at home at twenty-eight. His parents were lovely, generous people who never charged rent, never set a boundary. And that kid was miserable. He wasn’t free; he was stuck in a holding pattern, too ashamed to move forward because every day he woke up knowing he was a failure but unable to make any change. That’s not love. That’s not protection. That’s just everyone pretending the situation is fine.
So when Sandra asked me whether she should kick Derek out, I said, “Probably not. But you should do something else first.”
Here’s what I mean. Kicking someone out of your house is not actually a parenting strategy. It’s a last resort, the kind of sudden, extreme move that guarantees maximum relationship damage. It’s the difference between a surgeon amputating a toe that could have been saved with a different pair of shoes. Once you go there, the message Rebecca sends is not “I believe in you.” It’s “I’m done with you.” And for a young person who already feels like a failure, that can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
What Sandra needed wasn’t a yes or no answer. She needed a transition plan. And that starts with getting clear on the actual goal. Does she want Derek to become a responsible adult? Or does she want him gone? Those are two very different things. If the goal is responsibility, then moving out might happen naturally — but only if he has the scaffolding to climb.
So I told her my three-part plan.
First, stop making the basement feel like a hotel suite. This is not about punishment; it’s about reality. Change the Wi-Fi password. Unplug the television in the rec room. Start asking him to cook dinner for the family twice a week, not as a chore but as a normal part of living in a household. Young adults need to feel useful. When we let them contribute nothing, we accidentally teach them they’re worthless. This isn’t a harsh measure. It’s just saying, “You live here, and that comes with participation.”
Second, introduce a small, predictable financial stake. I knew Sandra’s instinct was to charge rent, but I warned her to start low and concrete. Two hundred dollars a month, or one hundred, if that’s what she can reasonably ask for. The exact number doesn’t matter as much as the act of paying. That money gives Derek a reason to get a part-time job, even if it’s just stacking shelves at the grocery store. He’ll also learn the quiet pride of contributing to his own household. Sandra felt uncomfortable charging her own son, and I understood. But the rent isn’t the point. The point is that he experiences the relationship between work and shelter. It’s the same way we teach kids to save for a toy they want. They value what they pay for.
Third, set a timeline that’s long enough to actually work. I hear so many parents say “you have to be out by the end of the month” — and then they cave because it’s unrealistic. Derek probably can’t land a full-time job, save for a deposit, and find a place in four weeks. That’s not a boundary; it’s a bluff. Instead, I suggested Sandra draw up a simple contract with her son. He pays rent starting on the first of the month. He has one year to build up a small emergency fund. And every Sunday evening, they sit down together for fifteen minutes and talk about capacity — what he tried this week, what got in the way, what he needs. The timeline isn’t a countdown to eviction; it’s a countdown to something bigger.
Sandra liked the contract idea, but then she said, “What if he just stops paying? What if he lies to me and says he’s applying for jobs when he’s really just playing games?”
That’s the hard part. Because the answer is: sometimes kids will lie. Sometimes they’ll backslide. But that’s not a reason to avoid stepping in. That’s a reason to step in with clear consequences that are already written down in the contract. If he doesn’t pay rent one month, he loses the Wi-Fi password until he does. If he misses two Sunday meetings, she drives him to the library to look for jobs with her, side by side. The point is that consequences come as part of an agreed-upon structure, not as emotional outbursts from a furious parent.
I also reminded Sandra of something I learned in the classroom. Students thrive when they feel both supported and challenged. The kids who struggle the most are the ones who have adults either hovering over them or backing completely away. Derek needs a supportive adult who asks, “What are you working toward?” and then stands beside him while he makes his own progress.
The phone call ended with Sandra saying she needed to think about the contract idea. She didn’t promise anything. I didn’t push. But two weeks later, she texted me a photo of a piece of paper taped to her fridge. Under the title “House Rules,” I could see three bullet points written in her neat cursive: rent two hundred dollars, Sunday meetings, and “no more leaving laundry on the staircase.” There was a small, hesitant smiley face drawn next to the last one.
I don’t know if Derek will stick to the plan. I don’t know if he’ll find a job next month or if he’ll be paying rent until he’s thirty. But Sandra has stopped asking me whether she should kick him out. That’s progress. We’re not looking for perfect outcomes. We’re just looking for the next honest step, the one that lets a kid look in the mirror and see someone who’s getting started, not someone who’s already done. That’s enough for tonight.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » My friend Sandra called me on a Tuesday afternoon, right in the middle of that exhausted hour when school pickups and work emails blur together