“Why Isn’t Anyone Fixing It?”—What Happens When Kids Demand a Call to Action
Wednesday night, 6:40 p.m., standing at the counter shredding cheese while my son ate his second bowl of pasta. The evening news was on, which I normally keep off at dinner, but our TV is in the kitchen and the remote was on the far counter. A story came on about families in another state who’d lost their homes to flooding. The segment showed a woman crying in front of a pile of wet furniture. Then a reporter interviewing a mayor about what would happen next.
My son spoon paused mid-air. “Why is everyone just talking about it?”
I set the knife down. “What do you mean?”
“Why doesn’t someone just fix it? They keep showing the lady crying, but nobody’s doing anything.”
I remember feeling two competing things at once: proud that he was paying attention to someone other than himself, and completely unprepared to explain the machinery of disaster response, FEMA, insurance, local government, and volunteer networks to an eight-year-old with pasta sauce on his chin. The gap between what he was asking and what I could say was so wide that I almost laughed. Instead, I said the classic useless parent thing: “Well, it’s complicated.”
He went back to his pasta. I didn’t.
That phrase—”call to action”—haunted me for the next few days. When you’re an adult, a call to action is something you either feel, ignore, or click on. It’s a donation button. A petition signature. A volunteer sign-up sheet. But when your child looks up from the news and says, “We should do something,” it’s different. You can’t hand them your phone and go back to the dishes. There’s nowhere to file their demand. It just sits there, in your kitchen, waiting for you to answer it.
A week later, I picked up my son from school and found his teacher, Ms. Okafor, crouched on the pavement tying her shoe outside the fourth-grade door. I asked her—half joking—if any kids in her class had been asking hard questions about the news lately. She looked up and said, “All the time.” She stood and told me about a project they’d done in early spring. The playground behind the school had a broken seesaw for nearly a year. A few kids had complained about it. She’d asked them, one afternoon, in that way teachers ask dangerous questions, “What could you do about it?”
They had no idea. So she walked them through it. She showed them what a letter to the city council looked like. They wrote one as a group, using sentence frames—”My name is ____, and I live at ____. I’m writing to ask you to ___ because ___.” She had them practice reading their letters out loud, even the shy ones, and then she mailed the paper copies to the city office. The kids didn’t believe the letters would actually get read. About three weeks later, the city council listed the seesaw repair as an item on a public agenda, and a maintenance crew came out to fix it. Not because of the letters, she admitted—it was probably already scheduled, and the timeline didn’t match up. Nobody could prove the letters caused anything. But the students saw that there was a way to speak, and that speaking got routed somewhere. It didn’t change their lives. It changed their sense of what a question could become.
“They don’t need to save the world,” she said. “They need to see that their concern has a destination.”
That idea—that a worry needs a destination—was the most useful thing anyone told me all year. When my son gets spun up about something on the news now, I don’t try to fix the whole situation for him. I try to find out where this particular concern would actually go. If he’s upset about an animal shelter in a town we used to live in, I propose we call them and ask what they need. If it’s a big national story—a wildfire, a school shooting 2,000 miles away—I say, “Let’s write one line to someone who works on that.” I’ll look up a representative’s contact page after he’s in bed and leave it open on the laptop so he can type his sentence the next morning. We’ve sent exactly three such messages so far this year. One was about a food bank near my sister’s house. One was a drawing of a bridge to the city parks department after he heard a story about a car accident. The third one he lost interest in before we could send it, and so we didn’t.
The thing that surprised me is that the action doesn’t have to be big to drain the static out of his head. When he’s upset about something, the action gives his feeling somewhere to land. It’s not about making him feel like he’s “making a difference,” in the heroic sense. It’s about showing him that the path from “I’m upset” to “I did something” is shorter than he thinks. Most of the time, doing something small—one cup of food, one envelope, one carrier pipe repair—is enough to calm the part of his brain that wants to solve the problem all at once.
The teacher in me wants to say this: a call to action isn’t a virtue. It’s a skill. It needs scaffolding. If you tell a child “You can change the world!” you’ve given them a task with no steps. Better to say, “Let’s find out who takes care of that thing.” That’s a sentence you can follow through on. That’s a map. When the news comes on and my son starts asking, “Why isn’t anyone helping?” I’ve learned not to answer with a speech about helpers or volunteers. I answer with a question of my own: “What would helping look like if you could watch it happen?” That gets us somewhere. Sometimes he says, “People with big trucks.” Sometimes he says, “Someone giving the lady a hug.” Both of those are useful answers. They tell me he’s thinking about scale, and about what a person can actually do with their hands.
We’re still figuring this out, honestly. The other night he asked me why there’s still so much trash in the ocean after “everyone knows about it.” I didn’t have a good answer. I told him I wasn’t sure, and that some problems are too big for one person, even an adult, to fix. Then I said, “But someone in a recycling company has a job where they think about this every day. Want to look up what that job is?” He did not want to. He wanted to watch the cat chase the laser dot. And honestly, that was fine.
I don’t know if we’re raising a future activist or just a kid who occasionally mails a drawing to a city official. Maybe the answer is that they’re the same thing, at his age. The letters we’ve sent haven’t changed anything measurable. The seesaw got fixed because a maintenance team got to it. The food bank sent my sister’s family some groceries. The drawing of the bridge is probably in a file somewhere, or maybe in the trash. But that’s not the point. The point is that when my son feels the world pressing in on him from the television screen, he’s learning that he can press back. It’s not much. It’s an envelope, a sentence, a conversation at the kitchen counter. It’s a practice, not a solution.
I still don’t have a neat answer to his original question—why people just talk instead of fixing things. I’ve got a few working theories now, and we talk about them, but I don’t pretend they’re complete. The action, for now, is the easier thing. The action we can do together, badly, imperfectly, with no measurable result. It keeps the door open between his worry and his hands. Maybe that’s all a call to action ever really is—a door you walk through even when you don’t know what’s on the other side. We’re still walking.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » “Why Isn’t Anyone Fixing It