Why I Still Approve Every Post and Comment on Our Class Blog (And Why We Added New Flairs)
On Friday afternoons, I usually sit down with a cup of tea and go through the pending posts and comments on our class blog. There were about fifteen items this week. Most were straightforward—photos from the science fair, a poem about autumn, three separate comments asking if we have homework over the weekend. But then I came to Marcus’s submission. It was a comment on our post about the upcoming field trip to the natural history museum. He had written: “I hope we see the dinosaur skeletons. My brother says the T-Rex is fake but I don’t believe him. Can we do a scavenger hunt like last time? That was fun.” There was a typo—hte instead of the—and he’d added a winking emoji. Nothing problematic. But it didn’t quite match the tone we’re trying to encourage.
I approved it anyway. I left the typo, let the emoji stay, and moved on.
This is the part of my week that people don’t talk about in teacher training. The constant deciding: what is okay to publish, what needs to be edited, what needs to be held back until I can talk to the student privately. It’s not censorship, exactly. We run a private blog, visible only to families in our class, and we use it to share our learning. But the approval process is real. Every single post and comment has to wait for me or my co-teacher to click “approve” before anyone else can see it. That means sometimes a kid writes something brilliant at 7 p.m. and it sits in a digital queue until the next morning, while they refresh the page for an hour, waiting for a comment from a classmate.
Last month, we introduced new flairs. For those who aren’t familiar, a flair is like a little badge that appears under your name on the blog. We set up three: “Curious Mind” for students who ask thoughtful questions, “Helpful Helper” for those who give constructive feedback, and “Editing Ninja” for students who proofread their own work carefully before posting. The idea came from a workshop I attended on digital citizenship. The presenter said visible acknowledgement can shape online behavior better than simply blocking or approving. She was right, but not in the way I expected.
The first week, I saw a scramble. Students started writing comments just to get the “Helpful Helper” badge. One girl, Priya, wrote “I love your drawing” on every single post, even the ones that were just announcements. She was being helpful, technically, but it felt hollow. Another boy, James, edited his comments so carefully that he stopped posting at all—he was too worried about making a typo and losing his “Editing Ninja” status. The flairs had created a kind of anxiety I hadn’t anticipated. I had to pull James aside and tell him that the badge was a nice extra, not a report card. He didn’t look convinced.
The approval process complicates things further. When I’m sitting with my tea, I have to consider both the content and the flair. Should I approve a comment that is kind but also rambling and off-topic? If I approve it, the student gets a “Helpful Helper” badge, but the comment isn’t actually that helpful. If I reject it, the student might feel like I’m ignoring their effort. There’s no perfect answer. I’ve started using the “edit” function more often, adding a small note like “Great idea, but let’s stay on topic next time!” and then approving. That feels less punitive, but it also takes time.
Marcus’s comment is a good example. It has a typo, so he doesn’t get the Editing Ninja badge. It’s enthusiastic and partly helpful—the scavenger hunt question is relevant—but it’s also personal and a little messy. I approved it, but I didn’t give him any flair. A few minutes later, I received a notification that he had messaged me directly: “Why didn’t I get a badge?” I explained that badges are for extra careful work, and that his comment was fine, not special. He wrote back, “Oh, okay.” That was it. But I could tell he was a little disappointed.
This is the nuance that parents and other teachers often don’t see. We don’t approve posts because we love rules. We do it because mistakes can hurt. A student once wrote a comment that was a joke about another kid’s haircut. It was funny to the writer, but it would have stung in print. I caught that one. Another time, a student posted a picture of their birthday party that included their home address visible in the background. I caught that one too. Every story in education is full of those close calls. But there’s a cost to all this vigilance. When a child’s work waits for approval, they learn that their voice depends on an adult’s permission. That’s a strange lesson to teach in a classroom that claims to value independence.
So we’ve been adjusting. Instead of approving everything myself, I now assign two “student moderators” each week. Their job is to look at new posts and comments and flag anything that might need my attention. They don’t approve anything—that’s still my call—but they add a little note like “This is nice” or “This might be too personal.” It gives them insight into the process, and it takes some pressure off my Friday session. The flairs have shifted too. We changed the descriptions to focus on growth rather than achievement. “Curious Mind” now says “asks questions that help us learn,” and it’s given out weekly by me and my co-teacher, not automatically. It feels less like a game and more like a genuine observation.
Marcus came up to me yesterday during recess. He told me he was working on a post for the blog about our class pet, a hamster named Biscuit. He said he wanted to include a question about whether hamsters can see in the dark. He asked if that would earn him the “Curious Mind” flair. I said I didn’t know, but I was curious about the answer myself. He grinned and ran off to the library.
I still approve every post and comment, and I probably always will. But the flairs have become less about labeling and more about prompting conversation. When I approve Marcus’s hamster post—if I approve it—I’ll probably write a comment back instead of just clicking the button. Something like “I wonder that too. What have you read so far?” That’s the real part of the job. Not the clicking. The thinking about how to reply.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why I Still Approve Every Post and Comment on Our Class Blog (And Why We Added New Flairs)