What Happens When a School Ditches Timed Math Quizzes?
One morning last spring, I watched a fourth grader drop a stack of paper into the recycling bin outside the gym. The top sheet said “Mad Minute” in bold letters, with a row of multiplication problems underneath and blanks waiting for answers. I knew it instantly. My oldest son used to bring those home folded into his back pocket like a ticket stub. I remember thinking, Did the school quit these? Then I went to a PTA meeting and found out yes. The school hadn’t just gotten rid of timed multiplication quizzes. It had gotten rid of the whole idea of practicing math that way.
Since I’ve been at this school, I’ve watched a lot of things come and go. The overhead projector disappeared years ago, replaced by a document camera that throws worksheets onto the wall in giant gray shadows. The teacher mailboxes got taken out of the office, and now every note comes through email. They even pulled out the big wooden playground slide last fall after a safety check. But nothing made me raise my eyebrows like watching those Mad Minutes vanish.
At Back-to-School Night in September, Mrs. Lane, the third-grade teacher, stood by the whiteboard holding a stack of blue cards. “We’re not doing speed drills this year,” she said. A few hands went up right away. A dad in the front row asked what a lot of us were thinking. “So how are they going to learn their facts?”
Mrs. Lane didn’t flinch. She asked everyone in the room to turn to their neighbor and solve 8 x 7—on paper, but with no timer, no pressure. Then she asked a second question. “I want to know how you solved it. Not what the answer is. How did your brain get there?” She pointed to the board. “Did you count up by sevens? Did you remember 8 x 8 and subtract one group of 8? Did you split it into 4 x 7 and double it?”
I drove home that night still not convinced. In fourth grade, my teacher made us do the Mad Minute first thing every morning. I was fast at multiplication then, and I still am. But if you asked me what 12 x 7 actually means—what that looks like in real life, how many weeks in a year, how many eggs in six dozen—I’d have to pause and count on my fingers. I knew the answers in a blink. I just didn’t always understand the number underneath.
My daughter is not a drill kid. She reads for two hours without moving and forgets her lunchbox in the car at least once a week. When she was in second grade, the old Mad Minutes made her cry at the kitchen table. I sat across from her with the stopwatch, and I know it was my hand holding the phone, not a teacher’s, that turned the page over when the timer went off. She finished half the problems and couldn’t breathe right for an hour. So I didn’t mind the change at first.
Then last month, she came home and told me they did a number talk. “Mrs. Lane put nine dots on the whiteboard and asked how many we saw,” she said. “Everyone saw it different. I saw 5 and 4, but Joey saw 6 and 3. And Emma saw three rows of three.”
That was when I started to understand what the school had replaced. It wasn’t a worksheet swap. They kept what they call “fact fluency,” but it doesn’t look like what it used to. It looks like playing multiplication war with cards from a deck. It looks like rolling two dice and writing the equation on a dry-erase board before anyone else. It’s kids standing at the front of the class explaining which strategy they used, even if it took them forty seconds to get there.
The research isn’t new. A lot of studies show that timed tests make young children anxious, especially kids who think carefully before they answer. Speed doesn’t equal understanding. I get all that in my head. But here’s the part I can’t quite shake.
My oldest son started fifth grade after this change went fully into place. He walked in carrying a backpack and a calculator’s worth of number sense, but the facts were just slower for him. He used the strategies, sure, but strategies take time. At his conference, his teacher said he could explain why 6 x 8 is 48 in three different ways. Then she paused and said, “It just takes him a little longer to get there.”
She wasn’t criticizing him. She was just telling the truth. But I sat in that tiny chair with the terrible feeling that we had thrown away something that worked for a certain kind of kid. My son is a memorizer. He likes the rhythm of flashcards. He likes the click of speed when he knows something instantly, without any tricks. For him, the Mad Minute wasn’t torture. It was a game, and he was good at it.
That’s the part of the “we changed the worksheet” conversation that doesn’t get enough airtime. There isn’t one right method for every child. Our school changed its approach for good reasons, and I still agree with most of them. But that doesn’t mean all the old tools were useless. The Mad Minute wasn’t evil. It just wasn’t fair for everyone. And now the school has to figure out what to do with the kids like my son—kids who need repetition and routine, who want to feel quick and certain, who didn’t need to be freed from the timer in the first place.
In our house, we’ve found a middle ground. We play a five-minute flashcard game after dinner, but I keep the timer off. We learned a trick from a friend: if you can’t remember 7 x 8, think of 8 x 8, which is 64, then subtract 8. My daughter loves that one. My son hates it. He’d rather just recite the tables in order like a song. So we do both—one night with the strategy, one night straight through, depending on who’s at the table.
Some of the parents started an unplanned fact night in the library once a month. No teacher runs it. We just bring card games and a few sets of dice, and the kids teach each other their favorite ways to get to an answer. It’s not a replacement for what the school took away. And honestly, the principal is not that fond of it. But it’s given families who disagree about the changes a reason to stand in the same room and talk about something that isn’t the school board.
Now it’s November. The Mad Minute pages don’t show up at the bottom of backpacks anymore. My daughter announced at breakfast that she can “see” 8 x 7 as a little rectangle in her mind. My son still counts on his fingers when he’s tired, even though he’ll deny it if you ask. I’m not sure where this will all land. The school did what it thought was best, which is all a school can do. I keep thinking the real change wasn’t just the quizzes, though. It was letting kids take their time. And I’m still working out whether that’s a trade I’m okay with—or whether it’s one I needed to make anyway.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Happens When a School Ditches Timed Math Quizzes