Why I Started Using John Taylor Gatto’s Teaching Methods at Home
The worksheet asked my daughter to match dates to historical events. She was nine, sitting at the kitchen table, chewing a pencil. The Boston Tea Party, the Battle of Gettysburg, the signing of the Declaration of Independence. She didn’t know what any of them were, but the teacher had taught the class a mnemonic, so she could match the numbers. She finished in four minutes, got a star, and closed the folder.
“What was the Civil War about?” I asked.
She tilted her head. “Slavery?” Then she added, honestly, “I think.”
That evening I found a copy of John Taylor Gatto’s Dumbing Us Down at the bottom of a box of books a friend was giving away. I’d heard of Gatto vaguely — a New York City teacher who had won Teacher of the Year, then used his platform to say something strange: school itself was the problem. He argued that children are taught, systematically, to be passive and dependent. Not by evil people, but by the structure itself. Bells, schedules, grading systems, age-segregated rooms. The hidden curriculum, he called it. I read it in one sitting.
I expected to feel angry. Instead, I felt uncomfortable, because the things he described were things I recognized in myself. The way I checked her homework for completion rather than comprehension. The way I praised her for getting through worksheets quickly. The way we both treated learning as a series of boxes to be checked — check the box, get the sticker, move on. Gatto wrote that children become what they are treated as. If we treat them as people whose job is to sit still, memorize facts, and wait for instructions, that’s exactly what they become.
I didn’t want to pull her out of school. That’s not where we landed. But I started to wonder if there were ways to do some of what Gatto did in his own classroom — ways that could work around the edges of a regular school day.
His actual methods were simple, and radical in a quiet way. He stopped using textbooks for much of his teaching. Students read primary sources, went out into the city, interviewed adults, wrote for real audiences. He also kept a system he called “loaded soup”—nothing more than tracking who his students really were. What they cared about, feared, did well. Not so he could test them, but so he could aim the material at them. A kid fascinated by boats got a reading list about shipwrecks. A kid who never shut up got asked to explain things to the class.
I started in the kitchen.
One thing Gatto was big on: children doing work with real consequences. The first experiment we tried was a family budget exercise. I was grocery shopping online anyway, and my daughter always asked for snacks. So instead of saying yes or no, I handed her the list and said, “Here’s the forty dollars for this week’s snacks. If you choose them, you have to live with what you pick.” She bought four kinds of cheese puffs and one kind of fruit. She spent more than half on the cheese puffs. By Thursday she told me, “I should have bought more oranges.” I said, “Yep.” She planned better the next week. No worksheet on nutrition happened that week, and she probably learned more about budgeting than I did in an entire semester of college economics.
The second thing was conversation. Gatto argued that conversation is the core of real teaching, and I believed him. But we weren’t having the right conversations. “How was school?” was a dead end. “What did you learn today?” was a dead end. What changed, subtly, was the questions I started asking. Not “what did you learn?” but “what did you question?” Not “what did you do?” but “what did you make?” Some nights she had nothing to say, which was fine. But some nights she’d tell me how the teacher had said Columbus was brave, and my daughter had questions about the people who were already there. That came from nowhere, except from being invited to question.
One weekend I did something else Gatto was known for: I took her to watch the city council meeting at our town hall. It lasted two hours, mostly about zoning regulations. I thought she’d be bored out of her skull. But the interesting thing was the moment when a neighbor stood up and asked about a streetlight that had been blinking outside her house for a month. She brought photos. She’d written a letter. The council told her to fill out a form. She told them she’d already filled it out three times. It was real. My daughter stared at that entire exchange like it was theater, which, in a way, it was. We talked about it on the walk home. She wanted to know how you get to ask questions at a meeting. She wanted to know if they had to answer. Those were better questions than any she’d answered on a homework sheet all semester.
I also stopped being so worried about facts. Gatto hated the way schools reduce education to memorizing piles of information. Facts without context evaporate. My daughter can tell you the year Columbus sailed because of a song her teacher taught her. It’s a nice song. But I’d rather she knows why exploration happened, why it was destructive, and how people disagreed about it. The year can wait.
Some things didn’t work, because some things don’t. I tried setting up an apprenticeship with a graphic designer down the street. My daughter was supposed to shadow her for a taster day. It fell through because of scheduling, and then the interest faded. I tried reading aloud from A People’s History of the United States and it was too dense. We switched to a historical novel, since Gatto always said narrative mattered more than lecture. A story about a kid in colonial America got her asking more questions than any textbook passage could.
The lasting change wasn’t in her. It was in me. Gatto’s methods require an adult to pay attention — really pay attention — to who a child is, not who you’d like them to be. That’s genuinely slow work. It means noticing that she’s more interested in bridges and buildings than animals, so I don’t push the nature documentary. It means letting her make mistakes in real situations — wasting the snack budget, missing an answer because she didn’t study — and not jumping in to fix it.
I’m still not sure where this goes. She’s nine. School is what it is. We’ll keep supplementing and questioning. I don’t have the patience to fully homeschool, and school gives her things I can’t: friends, structure, arguments with other kids, a teacher who isn’t me. Gatto might disagree with our middle path, and I don’t mind that. Maybe the point isn’t the path you choose so much as the awareness of why you’re on it. The opposite of what Gatto warned against isn’t a type of school. It’s attention, paid on purpose, to what a particular child actually needs. That’s slower and less dramatic than I expected. It’s also the best way I’ve found to teach anything.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why I Started Using John Taylor Gatto’s Teaching Methods at Home