What Makes A Good Civics And US History Curriculum: Practical Recommendations For Parents And Teachers
The coffee in my mug was cold by the time Javi pushed his worksheet across my kitchen table last month, brow furrowed. The 11-year-old is homeschooled by his mom, who’d asked me to help him work through a confusion that had come up for his westward expansion project. His curriculum called all settlers “brave pioneers chasing the American dream” and devoted half a page to conflict with native groups, calling it an “unfortunate but necessary step” to grow the country. Javi had seen a TikTok from a Cherokee teen his age talking about the Trail of Tears, where 4,000 Cherokee people died of hunger and disease being forced from their land, and couldn’t understand why none of that was in his book.
I’ve been a social studies educator for 12 years, seven in public middle school and five homeschooling my own two kids, so I get this question a lot. What curricula are actually good? How do you avoid the ones that whitewash the hard parts, or the ones that just add a single paragraph on a woman or Black leader to the same old story that hasn’t changed in 50 years? Javi’s mom told me she’d picked her curriculum because it was top-rated on a big homeschool site, and she’d had no idea how much it left out until Javi started asking questions.
Over the years, the first check I do when I look at a new civics or US history curriculum doesn’t cost anything, and it takes two minutes. I flip to the index and count. How many entries are there for women, indigenous people, Black Americans, Latino organizers, disabled activists, and working class people beyond the token names everyone knows? If the entire civil rights movement gets three pages and the Battle of Gettysburg gets 15, that’s a red flag for me. It’s not that battles aren’t important, it’s that the story of the people who built and fought for this country shouldn’t be an afterthought. I also check where those stories live. If every non-white, non-male person is stuck in a little sidebar separate from the main narrative, that’s not real inclusion. It’s just adding a side note to the same old story that centers only wealthy white men.
When I switched my own middle schooler from a popular mainstream curriculum to a smaller independent one two years ago, the first thing I noticed was that it started US history with indigenous civilizations that existed here for 10,000 years before European settlers showed up, not with Columbus landing in 1492. My son, who’d always thought history was boring because it was just memorizing dates, sat at the dinner table that night talking about how the Iroquois Confederacy had a system of shared governance that the US Constitution borrowed from, and his old textbook never mentioned that once.
The second thing I look for is that it asks questions, not just requires memorization. Too many curricula treat history like a list of facts to remember for a test, and civics like a list of rules to recite. Good curricula will ask kids to take on different perspectives, instead of just telling them what happened. For example, instead of a test question that asks “What year was the Louisiana Purchase?” it asks, “If you were an Osage farmer whose family had lived on this land for 10 generations, how would you feel about France selling it to the United States?” That’s the kind of question that makes kids think, not just regurgitate what the book says.
This matters just as much for civics as it does for history. Good civics curriculum doesn’t just teach you what the three branches of government are. It connects what happened in the past to what’s happening in your town right now. Last semester, we did a unit on voting rights with my 13 year old, and the curriculum had us look up the number of polling places in each county precinct near us. We found that the poorest majority-Black precinct 15 minutes from our house only has one polling place, while our mostly white suburban precinct has three. My kid sat there counting on his fingers and said, “That’s not fair. They make it harder for people to vote there on purpose.” That’s civics working. It’s not about memorizing the Pledge of Allegiance. It’s about teaching kids to spot unfairness and know how to ask questions about it.
I get a lot of parents asking me if this kind of curriculum turns kids against the US. Last year, a mom at my homeschool co-op pulled me aside after I mentioned the curriculum I use, and asked if it would give my kid a negative view of the country. I told her what my son said after that polling place activity. He said, “It’s supposed to be fair, right? So shouldn’t we fix it?” That’s the whole point. We don’t do kids any favors by lying to them about the hard parts of history. A curriculum that only tells the good parts doesn’t prepare them to show up as engaged citizens now.
I get asked for specific names all the time, so I’ll share what’s worked for me. If you’re an elementary school teacher or homeschool parent looking for low-prep, open-and-go, I’ve had great luck with Blossom & Root’s Early US History. It centers indigenous perspectives from the start, has hands-on activities that don’t require a million supplies, and doesn’t gloss over the hard parts. If you’re a classroom teacher or anyone on a tight budget, the Stanford History Education Group has free, full curriculum units for middle and high school that use primary sources, so kids get to read actual documents instead of just what the textbook says they mean. I’ve used their units on the Trail of Tears and the New Deal with my own kids, and they’re just as good as any paid curriculum I’ve tried. For high school civics, I recommend the Zinn Education Project’s free materials—they have lesson plans that connect past and present, and work for both classrooms and homeschools.
After we talked that afternoon, Javi and his mom pulled down the free Trail of Tears unit from Stanford, which includes actual diary entries from Cherokee people who survived the journey. Javi rewrote his project to center those voices, and when he presented it at co-op, half a dozen other kids said their own books had never mentioned how many people died, either.
I still don’t think there’s any perfect curriculum. Last month, I realized that even the one I use only devotes two pages to the 1960s grape strike led by Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta, so I pulled a free 10-minute interview with Huerta from YouTube and added it to our lesson plan. I think that’s okay. The goal isn’t to find a book that tells the whole story, because no one book can. The goal is to find one that gives kids room to ask the hard questions, instead of shutting them down when they notice the parts that are missing. Right now, that’s enough for me.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Makes A Good Civics And US History Curriculum: Practical Recommendations For Parents And Teachers