Can AI Actually Deliver Real Value in Education? A Teacher’s On-the-Ground Perspective
Last Tuesday, I stayed after school with Mia, one of my 4th grade students who has spent most of the year freezing up whenever she sees a multi-step word problem. She twisted her rainbow hair tie around her wrist so many times it went pale, and pushed her half-eaten granola bar across my desk, crumbs scattering over my chipped ceramic coffee mug. “I can’t do this,” she mumbled. “It sounds like a different language.”
I’d already walked her through the problem twice that week, and I was 20 minutes behind on grading permission slips for our upcoming field trip. On a whim, I pulled up the free tool I’d started testing a month earlier, pasted the problem in, and typed: “Rewrite this for a 9-year-old who loves baking and cats, make it sound like a conversation, not a homework problem.”
Thirty seconds later, we had a new version: it started with “Hey! My grandma is coming over this weekend to bake chocolate chip cookies for my scout troop, and she spilled a cup of flour on the cat (don’t worry, he’s fine, just looks like a ghost now)…” Before I could say anything, Mia snort-laughed and leaned forward. She read the whole thing out loud, paused, and said, “Oh, so we just need to add how many we have and subtract the broken ones?” She solved it in two minutes.
That moment made me stop bouncing between the two extremes I see everywhere: that it’s either going to fix all education’s problems or destroy childhood learning entirely. Most parents I talk to land on one side or the other, but neither matches what I see day to day in my classroom and at home with my own kids.
Last month, my oldest son, who’s 10 in 5th grade, was working on a science project about velociraptors. He’s been obsessed with them since he was 4, but all the kids’ books at our local library repeated the old information that they were scaly, cold-blooded lizards. The latest research says they had feathers, and most of the academic papers were way too dense for a 10-year-old to wade through. I asked the tool to pull the key points from the three most recent studies, rewrite them at a 5th grade reading level, and add bullet points of the coolest facts that most kids don’t learn. That took five minutes, where it would have taken me an hour or more to dig through that stuff myself.
Then I turned around and found him copying the whole thing word for word onto his poster notes. I didn’t panic or take the computer away. I just sat down next to him and said, “Cross out any sentence that you wouldn’t actually say when you present this. Then add three things you think are cool that the tool didn’t mention.” He ended up erasing 70% of what was written, drew a picture of a feathered velociraptor chasing a T-Rex, and added that he thought it was weird that people got it wrong for so long. He got second place, but what mattered was he talked for eight minutes straight about his project, no notes, because it was his.
The real value I’ve seen isn’t the tool teaching kids. It’s cutting out the boring, repetitive stuff that keeps adults and kids from actually focusing on learning. I used to spend three hours every Sunday making differentiated reading worksheets for my four reading groups – one group is a year behind, one group is a year ahead, and the other two are right on level. Now I get a first draft of all four sets, I just tweak the questions to fit the books we’re reading, and that takes 15 minutes. That frees up almost three extra hours I can spend sitting with kids like Mia, working through the anxiety that makes them freeze up, instead of typing worksheets.
For parents, I tell them three concrete things I’ve tested that work, instead of banning it or letting kids use it unsupervised. First, if your kid is stuck on homework, don’t let it solve the problem for them. Ask it to rephrase the problem in terms of whatever they love. If they love Minecraft, ask it to turn the fractions problem into a problem about building a base. If they love soccer, turn it into a problem about scoring goals. That removes the barrier of confusing wording without doing the work for them.
Second, if you’re worried about them using it to cheat on writing assignments, don’t ban it. Tell them they can use it to write the first rough draft, but they have to delete any line that doesn’t match what they actually think about the topic, and add three of their own questions that it didn’t answer. A mom I know tried this with her 7th grader who was using it for all his book reports. After he did that, he ended up adding a whole section about how he hated the main character, and had a 20-minute conversation with his dad about why that was, which never would have happened if he’d just turned in the pre-written report.
Third, use it to get rid of the busywork that takes time away from your kid. If you’re planning a school project and don’t have time to make a supply list or a timeline, let it do that. The time you save can be spent reading with them or helping them practice for a quiz, which is the stuff that actually matters.
Last week, Mia taped her B on her latest math quiz to the edge of my desk. It’s still there, next to a drawing a different kid gave me of a purple penguin. I still don’t think any tool is a replacement for a teacher sitting with a kid who’s scared, or a parent listening to their kid talk about what they love. There are still days I worry – last month I had a 6th grader tell me he couldn’t think of what to write for a personal narrative because he let it write it, and it didn’t know that his grandma moved away last year. That’s a problem, and I’m still figuring out how to talk to kids about that.
But so far, the real value is simple: it’s a tool that moves the boring stuff out of the way. If you use it that way, it gives more time back for the parts of education that actually stick. I’m still learning what that looks like day to day, but I haven’t gone back to spending three hours a week making worksheets. And Mia still stops after school once a week to work on word problems, and she hasn’t mumbled “I can’t do this” in almost a month.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Can AI Actually Deliver Real Value in Education