Do Grades Measure Learning or Just How Well Kids Follow Instructions? A Teacher’s Perspective
I was sitting at my kitchen table grading 4th grade bean plant projects last month, coffee gone cold, when I laid the two projects side by side and felt that familiar, uncomfortable tug I’ve gotten used to in eight years of teaching.
On one side was Mia’s project: a 12-by-18 poster board, neatly divided into sections exactly per the instructions. Every daily growth log was filled out in neat cursive, the required three-paragraph write-up was perfectly structured, and it was decorated with hand-drawn flowers and glitter that still sheds on my dining table. Per the rubric we sent home with the assignment, this was a straight 100%, an A+. But when I pulled Mia aside after class to ask about it, she admitted the three original beans she planted by the window all died after three days. “So I got new beans from my mom and started over,” she said. “I just wrote down the numbers I thought they were supposed to be so I wouldn’t get points off.” She couldn’t tell me why the first batch died, what she would change next time, or even anything she’d learned from the process. She just followed the instructions to get the grade.
On the other side was Javi’s project. It was a crumpled poster board, edges chewed a little by his family’s golden retriever, only five of the ten required daily logs filled in, no three-paragraph write-up, just scribbled notes in the margins. Javi completely ignored the instruction to plant all four beans in the same location with the same amount of water. Instead, he watered one with tap water, one with coffee, one with soda, and one with Gatorade, because he wanted to see if sugar would change how they grew. He even brought the actual cups in his backpack to show me—you could see the fuzzy mold growing on the soda bean’s soil. He rambled for five minutes about how the coffee plant grew taller but the stem was all floppy because the coffee made the soil too acidic, a detail we’d talked about in class two weeks prior that I’d forgotten most kids had even caught. Per the rubric, he got a 72, a C minus.
Javi’s mom came in for parent-teacher conferences that week, saw the C, and immediately pulled out her phone to look for science tutors. “He’s always been good at messing around instead of doing what he’s told,” she said. “I knew this would catch up to him.” I asked Javi to tell her about his experiment, and he walked her through every step, pulled out the photos he took on his dad’s old phone of the plants each week, and answered every question she had correctly. She sat there quiet after that, and I could see her connecting the dots: the C wasn’t because he didn’t learn anything. It was because he didn’t follow the rules of the assignment.
That’s the thing no one talks about much when we talk about grades. Most rubrics are built on checklists, and most checklists measure compliance, not learning. Is it turned in on time? Does it have all the required sections? Is it neat? Did you do it exactly the way the teacher asked? Those are all about following instructions, not about what you actually understand. I’ve seen straight A students who can’t solve a simple real-world problem because they’ve only ever learned to give the teacher the answer they want, not think for themselves. I’ve seen kids who get mostly Bs and Cs who can out-experiment, out-explain, out-think just about anyone in the class, because they’re too busy messing around and testing ideas to remember to format their essay correctly.
It doesn’t have to be this big, complicated change for parents or teachers, though. For parents, the easiest thing you can do is change the first question you ask when your kid gets home with a graded assignment. Instead of leading with “What grade did you get?” ask “What’s the coolest thing you learned while you worked on this?” and follow it up with “What’s one thing you tried that didn’t work the way you expected?” It takes 30 extra seconds at dinner, and it tells your kid that what they learned matters more than the letter on the paper. I started telling all parents that at conferences this year, and most say it already changes how they talk about school.
For teachers, I made one small change to my own grading this year that took almost no extra time: I flipped the weights on my rubrics. Now 70% of the grade is for showing me what you learned—can you explain your idea, did you test it, can you answer questions about it—and only 30% max is for logistics like turning it in on time, having all the required sections, neatness. If you forget the write-up but can explain your project out loud to me after class, you don’t lose half your points. It’s a small shift, but it’s already changed what kids turn in: more messy experiments, more weird ideas, more actual learning.
I still struggle with it, honestly. When I’m grading 28 projects in one night after back-to-school night and a staff meeting, it’s still easier to check the boxes than it is to sit and think about how much each kid actually learned. Javi’s still getting more Cs than As, because he still forgets to turn in homework half the time, but he’s now the first one to raise his hand to lead our group experiments, and his mom told me he does little science projects in the backyard on weekends now, just for fun. Mia still gets straight As, and we’ve started talking about how it’s okay to experiment and get things wrong even if it means losing a few points. It’s not a perfect system, and I don’t have all the answers. But that side-by-side comparison of two bean projects stuck with me. Grades tell you something, sure. But they don’t always tell you what your kid actually knows.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Do Grades Measure Learning or Just How Well Kids Follow Instructions