Testing a 60-minute hands-on math workshop for 9 to 11 year olds: observations and request for feedback
The final bell rang at 3:15 last Wednesday, crumbs from the free after-school snack scattered across my classroom tables, and 12 of my Year 5 and 6 students dumped their backpacks on the floor instead of heading out to the playground. I’d been planning this trial math workshop for six weeks, and I was already hovering by the whiteboard, half-convinced I’d messed the whole thing up before we started.
For months, I’d heard the same thing from my class and their parents: kids this age think math is just a list of rules to memorize for the end-of-term test. The kids who struggle zone out. The kids who ace every worksheet still can’t tell you why they’d ever need to calculate equivalent fractions outside of class. I wanted to build a 60-minute workshop that fixed that—no drills, no fill-in-the-blank worksheets, just real problem solving that felt worth doing.
I landed on planning a class camping trip, since almost all of my kids have been camping with family or begged to go. They had to work in groups of three to budget for supplies, calculate travel distance and van rental costs, sort supplies by weight to fit the van, and adjust their plan to hit a fixed $300 total budget. It’s packed with the exact skills they’re supposed to master this term: multi-digit multiplication, adding decimals, comparing fractions, scaling numbers up and down for groups. It just doesn’t look like homework.
Ten minutes in, Mia, who brings a lizard stuffed toy to every class, raised her hand and asked if she could look up actual tent prices on her mom’s phone. I almost said no, like I would for a regular test, then realized that’s what you’d actually do if you were planning a trip, so I said yes. Fifteen minutes later, the room was loud enough that the teacher next door popped her head in, but it wasn’t the disruptive kind of noise. Javi, who never turns in his homework and rarely speaks up during math, was leaning over the table, pointing at a crumpled budget sheet, telling his group they’d added the van rental twice. No one questioned him. He found the mistake, and they adjusted.
Thirty minutes in, Lila, who gets full marks on every in-class test, came over to my desk, arms crossed, and asked me again if her group’s plan was right. They’d cut the first-aid kit budget to get extra s’mores, and she couldn’t shake the feeling that was wrong. There isn’t one right answer, I told her. Any plan that hits the budget works. She went back to her group still frowning, and spent the next ten minutes double-checking every number instead of brainstorming. That’s when I realized I’d messed up a spot I didn’t even think about: kids who’ve only ever experienced one-right-answer math feel unsteady when that structure goes away.
We wrapped exactly at 4:15, 60 minutes on the dot. I’d split it 10 minutes intro, 35 minutes group work, 10 minutes share-out, 5 minutes exit slip. A few of the boys were already grabbing their backpacks 10 minutes before we ended, wiggly and ready to run around. 60 minutes is a long time to sit and work on one activity for 9 to 11 year olds, but if I cut it to 45, there’s no time for the slow back-and-forth that makes the problem solving worth it. That’s the first big question I can’t answer on my own.
I’ve run two trials so far, and the pattern is consistent: the kids who struggle most with traditional math are usually the ones leading these groups. They’re good at the messy, flexible thinking that real problem solving needs. But I still have kinks. Mixed ability groups work well for most kids, but I’ve had a few cases where the advanced kid does all the math and the other two just sign off. I tried assigning fixed roles—one budget checker, one supply manager, one spokesperson—to fix that, which helped, but it’s still not perfect. I’ve also had multiple parents ask how this connects to the skills their kids need for standardized tests, which is a totally fair question. I know the math is there, but I need to make that connection clearer for both kids and parents, so it doesn’t just feel like a fun free period.
I’m getting ready to roll this workshop out as a regular after-school option at my school, and I’m also putting together a simplified version that parents can do at home for family math night or a rainy weekend. That’s why I’m asking for your feedback, whether you’re a teacher or a parent of a 9 to 11 year old.
If you’re a teacher, have you ever run a similar long-form problem solving workshop for this age group? What timing worked for you? What tricks do you use to make sure every kid in a group participates, not just the fastest or most confident? If you’re a parent, what’s the most frustrating thing about your kid’s experience with math right now? Is it that they don’t see the point, that they lack confidence, that they’re bored or struggling to keep up? Would you want to do a 60-minute family math activity at home, or is that too long to fit into a busy week? What would make it worth your time, versus another worksheet packet from school?
After last week’s trial, Javi stopped me by the parking lot on his way out with his dad. He said, “I didn’t know math was actually useful for stuff I want to do. I thought it was just for school.” That’s the reaction I’m chasing. But I also have Lila’s mom’s email saved, asking what I can do to help her daughter feel less confused about the whole thing. I don’t have this all figured out yet, and I don’t want to build something that only works for the kids who already fit my idea of what fun math should be. All thoughts are welcome, big or small, in the comments below.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Testing a 60-minute hands-on math workshop for 9 to 11 year olds: observations and request for feedback