What Parents Need To Know About The University Of Chicago And Anthropic Controversy
The counter next to my laundry basket still has a crumb of peanut butter granola bar from the night my kid called me about the University of Chicago’s Anthropic partnership. Lila’s my oldest, a first-year comparative literature major, and it was 9:17 p.m. Central time, right after she’d finished her first close reading paper of finals week. She didn’t even say hello when I picked up, just sent a screenshot of the department-wide email and said, “What does this even mean?”
I’d heard the name Anthropic a handful of times before, just as the company that makes the AI chatbot Claude, same as OpenAI makes ChatGPT. The email was short, vague, just announced the university’s new multi-year partnership to test AI for grading and course research, and that Anthropic would get access to a decade of student coursework for model training. No details on opt-outs, no note that faculty had been asked for input, just released 48 hours before the start of final exams.
I got off the phone, pulled the announcement up myself, and was just as confused. Why this timing? Why push through this deal when students had spent the whole semester protesting tuition hikes and pushing for better mental health coverage that admin still hadn’t addressed? Why won’t anyone answer basic questions like how much money Anthropic is paying for access to all that student work? It felt intentionally confusing, dropped when everyone was too busy to dig in, which is exactly what makes it so frustrating for parents and students alike.
A week later, I joined the UChicago Parent Association monthly Zoom, and half the call was about this. One dad whose son is a senior in molecular engineering said his son’s senior thesis, which he’s still getting ready to submit to an academic journal, was automatically included in the dataset unless he jumped through hoops to remove it. Another mom, a high school teacher, said her daughter had gotten so worked up about it she’d missed a study session for her midterm. All of us were asking the same thing: what do we do now?
I went to parent weekend two weeks later, met Lila for hot cocoa on the quad, it was 35 degrees with wind off the lake, and we ran into her intro prof, Dr. Hale, who’d written Lila’s recommendation letter when she applied. He shook his head when we asked about the partnership. Said he found out the same day students did, no heads up from admin, no survey of faculty about whether we wanted this. He uses AI to help his students brainstorm essay outlines, he said, but he’d never agree to hand over their personal work to a private company. That lines up with what I’ve seen from most faculty there: most of the pushback is coming from them too, just like students.
What I’ve learned from sorting through this mess is that there are concrete, small things parents can do when a school drops this kind of unplanned, opaque change on your kid, especially during a high-stress time like finals. First off, don’t assume your kid has the time or energy to sort through the fine print. Lila had three papers and an exam that week, so I sat down for an hour one night after work and dug up the full partnership agreement. It was buried on the university’s research site, no link from the flashy press release that announced the deal. What I found was that the default setting for all student work is “shareable with Anthropic,” and you have to actively opt out if you don’t want your work used. The original opt-out process was a three-page form that required you to list every single assignment you wanted removed, which sounded designed to make people give up out of frustration. After a week of protests, admin simplified it to a one-click opt-out for all current work, but it’s still opt-out not opt-in, which tells you everything you need to know about their priorities.
The first concrete step I took that helped was offering to handle the paperwork. I pulled all Lila’s assignments from her Canvas page, made the list the original form required, filled it out, and sent it in for her while she studied for her modernism final. It took me 45 minutes, and it took a ton of unnecessary stress off her plate. Second, if your kid wants to push for change, don’t brush it off as overreacting. Instead, help them connect to people who are already organizing. Lila wanted to sign the open letter from humanities students, but she didn’t know how to get involved beyond that. I just helped her find the student government’s existing working group on AI policy through their public website, and she sent an email to join next quarter. Third, if you’re part of a parent association, put transparency around AI partnerships on the agenda. I brought it up at our last meeting, and the whole group agreed to draft a letter to the board of trustees asking for clear, public rules for any future deals that use student data: mandatory opt-in for all student work, full disclosure of financial terms, and formal input from students and faculty before any deal is signed. We sent it last week, and we’re still waiting for a response.
It’s easy to look at this whole thing and write it off as just another messy growing pain for AI in higher ed, but it doesn’t feel that way from where I’m sitting. This deal was ill-timed on purpose, I think. Dropped when everyone is too busy to push back, inscrutable on purpose, because if you don’t answer the hard questions about money and data rights, no one can hold you accountable. Lila got her opt-out confirmation email last week, so her work is safe for now. But there are still so many unanswered questions: what about students who graduated before this deal was announced, whose work is still in the university’s archives? How will Anthropic secure the data, and who is liable if it gets breached? No one from admin has answered any of those.
We don’t have a neat ending here. The parent association’s letter is still waiting for a reply, Lila’s going to her first working group meeting next month, and I’m still getting emails from other parents asking how to walk their kids through the opt-out process. It’s not a big, dramatic change, just small, slow steps. For now, that’s all any of us can do.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Parents Need To Know About The University Of Chicago And Anthropic Controversy