Are Kids Taught New Math or Common Core? A Fourth Grade Teacher Explains What’s Really Happening
The canvas tote falls open on my conference table as Mia, Jax’s mom, leans forward, and a crumpled fourth grade homework sheet slides out across my half-empty coffee mug. Jax is loitering in the hall, spinning a dinosaur fidget spinner I left out for nervous kids, so we can talk privately. “I need you to settle this for me,” she says, tapping the paper. “Online everyone’s yelling about new math, then someone says it’s Common Core. Which one is my kid actually doing? And why can’t he just subtract like I did?”
I smooth out the paper. The problem is 124 minus 47. Jax didn’t line the numbers up vertically, cross out the 2 in the tens place, borrow from the 1 in the hundreds, and work his way down like we all did in the 90s. Instead, he wrote: 124 minus 40 is 84, minus 7 more is 77. He got the answer right, but my student teacher had marked it “incomplete” in red pen because it didn’t match the step-by-step example on the worksheet. That’s where the confusion started.
Mia says she spent 20 minutes last night trying to make him redo it her way, and they ended up arguing over homework, which is their new nightly routine. She’d heard Common Core was a federal government plan to make kids bad at math, and “new math” was some weird trick it forced teachers to use.
I get the mix-up. I’ve had this same conversation at 11 out of 12 parent conferences this fall. Most people use the terms interchangeably, but they’re not the same thing at all. Common Core is just a set of standards, not a curriculum or a teaching method. It was written back in 2009, and it just says what skills kids should master by each grade level. It doesn’t tell teachers they have to use a specific method to get kids there. The stuff people call “new math” now is just the teaching approach that popped up after Common Core came out, because the standards prioritize number sense over memorizing step-by-step algorithms first.
It’s not even a new idea. People were complaining about “new math” back in the 1950s, after Sputnik launched and everyone panicked that American kids were falling behind in math. It’s the same debate, just with new names: do we teach kids how to get the right answer fast, or do we teach them why numbers work the way they do?
I pull up Jax’s last unit quiz on my computer to show Mia. Jax aced every subtraction problem, even the three-digit ones with zeros, which are notoriously tricky for kids who only memorize the borrowing rule. I tell her about the 5th grader I had a few years back who could never get 1000 minus 275 right with the traditional method—he always forgot how to borrow across all those zeros and ended up with 825 or 735 instead of 725. Then one day he showed me his own way: he added up from 275 to 1000. 275 plus 25 is 300, 300 plus 700 is 1000, so 700 plus 25 is 725. He never got that problem wrong again.
That’s the point of all these different methods most people call “new math.” It’s not about confusing parents. It’s about letting kids figure out how numbers work, instead of just repeating steps they don’t really understand. A lot of kids grow up memorizing how to do long division, but when they get to algebra and have to work with variables, they hit a wall because they never actually learned how numbers interact.
After talking for a few minutes, Mia relaxes. She laughs and says her mom complained about “new math” when she was Jax’s age, which is actually true—her mom was in school in the 70s, when the first big new math reform was rolling out. It’s the same cycle, just different labels.
So what do I tell parents who ask me what to do at home, when they don’t get what their kid is doing? First, instead of jumping in and showing them your way, ask them to explain their steps to you. That’s it, that’s the first thing. Last month, a dad told me he did this after I suggested it, and he realized his 9 year old had come up with a faster way to multiply two-digit numbers than the one he learned. It also helps kids cement their own understanding when they have to talk through what they did.
Second, if you really want to show how you learned it, frame it as an alternative, not the correct way. Say something like “That’s a cool way. I do it this different way, let’s see if we get the same answer” instead of “That’s wrong, do it my way.” That takes the pressure off and keeps homework from turning into a fight.
Third, if your kid really likes the traditional algorithm better than the breaking numbers apart method, it’s totally fine to show it to them. The only rule I tell parents is to ask them why it works after they do a problem. If they can tell you why you borrow the one, or why you carry the two, it doesn’t matter what method they use.
Mia folded the homework sheet back up and put it in her tote, and called Jax in to get his usual lollipop before they left for soccer practice. That night, she commented on our school’s PTA Facebook group that she’d been wrong to panic about new math, and that her kid actually knew what he was doing the whole time.
I still get asked this question every week, though. Some parents are convinced it’s all a pointless experiment, some schools still stick only to traditional methods even with the new standards, and no one seems to be able to keep the terms straight. It’s not a perfect system, and it’s still changing as teachers figure out what works best for their kids. Right now, the thing that works the most for me is just helping parents untangle the names, and give their kids’ weird, different-looking math a chance.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Are Kids Taught New Math or Common Core