An Open Letter to the ASU+GSV Summit Committee: Who Does Your North Star Truly Guide?
To the Leaders, Innovators, and Decision-Makers at ASU+GSV,
Every year, the ASU+GSV Summit brings together some of the brightest minds in education and technology to “reimagine the future of learning and work.” The event’s mission—guided by its North Star of “equitable access to the future”—is undeniably noble. But as the summit grows in scale and influence, a critical question lingers: Who, exactly, is this North Star illuminating?
For years, the summit has championed groundbreaking ideas: AI-driven personalized learning, workforce upskilling platforms, and ventures promising to democratize education. Yet, as conversations about “disruption” and “scale” dominate the stage, a troubling pattern emerges. The very communities often cited as beneficiaries of these innovations—low-income students, marginalized groups, underfunded public schools—remain conspicuously absent from decision-making tables. This raises doubts about whether the summit’s North Star is guiding us toward equity or inadvertently reinforcing the status quo.
1. When “Innovation” Overlooks Systemic Barriers
The ASU+GSV Summit thrives on optimism. Startups pitch AI tutors that adapt to individual learning styles. Investors celebrate platforms that promise to “close the skills gap.” But behind the buzzwords lies a harsh reality: Many of these solutions assume that systemic inequities can be fixed with better apps or algorithms.
Take, for example, the student debt crisis. While panels discuss income-share agreements and alternative credentialing, over 45 million Americans still collectively owe $1.7 trillion in student loans. Similarly, schools in underserved neighborhoods lack basics like functioning HVAC systems or certified teachers—issues no amount of gamified learning software can solve. By prioritizing tech-centric solutions, the summit risks conflating innovation with impact.
The committee must ask: Are we addressing root causes, or are we slapping Band-Aids on deep, structural wounds?
2. The Irony of “Access” in Exclusive Spaces
ASU+GSV’s commitment to “equitable access” feels paradoxical when the summit itself remains inaccessible to many. Ticket prices start at $2,000, and the event’s influencer-heavy atmosphere often prioritizes networking over nuanced dialogue. How can we claim to represent marginalized voices when those most affected by education inequity can’t afford a seat at the table?
This isn’t just about cost. It’s about whose stories are amplified. Keynote speeches lean heavily on CEOs and policymakers, while grassroots educators, students, and families—those navigating the system daily—are relegated to side stages or excluded entirely. If the summit truly aims to democratize education, it must democratize participation first.
3. The Profit Motive vs. The Public Good
Education technology is now a $300 billion industry. Venture capitalists flock to ASU+GSV to scout the next unicorn, and startups compete to monetize learning. But when profit becomes the primary driver, who safeguards the public interest?
Consider the rise of “personalized learning” tools. While marketed as equity-focused, many rely on harvesting student data or locking schools into expensive subscriptions. Meanwhile, public institutions—already stretched thin—are pressured to adopt these tools to keep up, often without evidence of their long-term efficacy. The committee must confront an uncomfortable truth: Not all innovation is equitable, and not all scaling leads to justice.
4. Redefining the North Star: A Call for Accountability
The ASU+GSV Summit has the potential to be a force for transformative change. But this requires a fundamental shift in priorities:
– Center Marginalized Voices: Invite students, teachers, and community organizers to lead sessions. Offer scholarships or free passes to ensure diverse representation.
– Measure Impact, Not Just Investment: Create transparent metrics to evaluate whether summit-backed initiatives reduce disparities (e.g., graduation rates, debt burdens) rather than focusing solely on user growth or revenue.
– Challenge the “Disruption” Narrative: Elevate solutions that strengthen public education instead of undermining it. For example, partner with districts to improve teacher retention or fund open-source resources.
– Address Power Imbalances: Acknowledge that tech alone cannot fix systemic racism, underfunding, or policy failures. Use the summit’s platform to advocate for legislative changes, such as canceling student debt or increasing Title I funding.
Final Thoughts: A North Star for All
The ASU+GSV Summit’s vision of an equitable future is inspiring. But a North Star is only as meaningful as the paths it illuminates. Right now, too many of those paths lead to profit-driven ventures, exclusive networks, and superficial solutions.
To the committee: It’s time to ask hard questions. Who benefits from the innovations celebrated here? Who is left behind? And what would it look like to prioritize people over products?
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Millions of learners are counting on us to ensure that “equitable access” isn’t just a slogan—it’s a reality. Let’s make sure the North Star guides us all, not just the few.
Sincerely,
A Concerned Advocate for Education Justice
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » An Open Letter to the ASU+GSV Summit Committee: Who Does Your North Star Truly Guide