Beyond “To Be or Not To Be”: Why It’s Time to Move Shakespeare Off the Required Reading List
Let’s be real for a second. How many of you, when handed a hefty volume of Shakespeare in high school, genuinely felt excitement? More likely, it was a wave of dread, punctuated by the rustle of desperately flipping to the footnotes or the frantic search for a “No Fear Shakespeare” translation. The argument is simple, yet increasingly potent: We need to stop being taught Shakespearean texts and language as a mandatory cornerstone of English education. It’s not about dismissing the Bard’s genius; it’s about questioning whether clinging to 400-year-old plays, written in a language vastly different from our own, is the best way to cultivate a love of literature and critical thinking in today’s students.
There’s no denying Shakespeare’s monumental impact. He shaped the English language, explored profound human truths, and created characters and stories that still resonate. But reverence shouldn’t equal obligation in the modern classroom. The core problem lies in accessibility. Early Modern English, with its archaic vocabulary (“thou,” “thee,” “wherefore”), complex syntax, and unfamiliar idioms, creates an immediate, often insurmountable barrier. Students spend so much mental energy just deciphering what is being said that they often miss why it matters. The beauty of the poetry, the tension of the plot, the nuance of character development – all get lost in the linguistic fog. It’s like trying to appreciate a stunning landscape while wading through thick mud. You might eventually get there, but you’re exhausted, frustrated, and the view might not feel worth the struggle.
This focus on decoding distracts from the very skills we aim to teach: literary analysis, critical thinking, and emotional connection with texts. When comprehension is a constant battle, meaningful engagement becomes a luxury. Discussions often stall at the level of plot summary or basic character motives (“Is Hamlet really crazy?”), rather than delving into deeper themes, social commentary, or the artistry of the writing itself. Compare this to the profound discussions that can erupt when students read a powerful, contemporary novel written in their language, tackling issues they recognize. Suddenly, analysis flows more naturally because the words themselves aren’t the primary obstacle.
Furthermore, the mandatory status of Shakespeare often crowds out diverse and relevant voices. The literary canon is vast and rich, spanning centuries and continents. Yet, precious classroom time dedicated solely (or primarily) to Shakespeare means less exposure to:
1. Modern & Diverse Perspectives: Where are the powerful voices of the 20th and 21st centuries? Where are the stories reflecting the diverse racial, ethnic, gender, and socio-economic realities of students sitting in class today? Works by authors like Toni Morrison, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, George Orwell, Margaret Atwood, Khaled Hosseini, or Angie Thomas offer profound explorations of human nature, society, and identity using language that resonates now.
2. Different Genres & Forms: An overemphasis on Elizabethan drama neglects the richness of modern poetry, compelling non-fiction, graphic novels, impactful short stories, and contemporary plays. These forms often connect more directly with students’ experiences and the media they consume daily.
3. Global Literature: Focusing predominantly on a single (albeit brilliant) Englishman limits students’ understanding of the global human experience. Literature from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and beyond offers invaluable, often underrepresented, perspectives.
“But,” the traditional argument goes, “Shakespeare is foundational! It’s cultural literacy! You need to know it!” This argument holds some weight, but it needs context. Yes, Shakespeare permeates culture – references pop up, adaptations abound. But does this necessitate every student dissecting multiple plays line-by-line? Understanding Romeo and Juliet’s basic plot or knowing that “All the world’s a stage” comes from Shakespeare is different from requiring mastery of the text in its original form. Cultural awareness can be achieved through exposure, adaptation, and contextual learning, not necessarily through mandatory, in-depth study of the original texts.
Imagine a different approach:
Shakespeare as Elective: Offer rich, dedicated courses for students genuinely fascinated by his work. These classes could delve deeply into the language, historical context, and performance aspects without overwhelming those who aren’t interested.
Modern Adaptations: Use film, modern-dress stage productions, or graphic novel versions to introduce the stories and themes in an accessible way. Baz Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet or 10 Things I Hate About You (based on The Taming of the Shrew) prove the stories can connect powerfully when presented accessibly.
Excerpts & Context: Instead of entire plays, incorporate key soliloquies or famous scenes into broader units on literary history, poetic devices, or thematic studies (power, love, ambition). This provides exposure without the burden of the full linguistic challenge.
Focus on Legacy & Influence: Study how Shakespeare has influenced modern storytelling, language, and themes, perhaps examining contemporary works that draw on or respond to his ideas.
The goal isn’t to erase Shakespeare from our cultural consciousness. It’s to liberate classroom time and student energy for a richer, more relevant, and ultimately more engaging literary experience. Forcing every student through the linguistic labyrinth of Macbeth or King Lear often achieves the opposite of fostering a love of reading. It can breed resentment, frustration, and a belief that “classic” literature is inherently difficult, boring, and disconnected from their lives.
Education should meet students where they are and equip them with tools for the world they live in. By moving Shakespeare off the mandatory pedestal, we make space for a vibrant, diverse, and accessible literary landscape. We allow students to encounter powerful stories and complex ideas in a language they understand, fostering genuine analysis, critical thought, and, crucially, the potential to spark a lifelong joy in reading. It’s time to stop asking whether to be or not to be required reading, and start embracing the vast world of literature waiting beyond the Elizabethan stage. Let’s give students texts they can truly engage with, learn from, and perhaps even love.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Beyond “To Be or Not To Be”: Why It’s Time to Move Shakespeare Off the Required Reading List