Beyond the Bard: Why It’s Time to Shift Focus from Shakespeare in Our Classrooms
Picture this: a classroom of modern teenagers, fluent in the rhythms of social media and digital storytelling, grappling with phrases like “wherefore art thou Romeo?” or trying to decipher the intricate social codes of 16th-century Verona. For many students, encountering Shakespeare isn’t a thrilling initiation into literary greatness; it’s often an exercise in frustration, confusion, and wondering, “Why are we still doing this?” There’s a growing, compelling argument that our unwavering devotion to teaching Shakespearean texts and language might be doing more harm than good in fostering a genuine love for literature and critical thinking today. Maybe it’s time we asked: do we really need to stop being taught Shakespeare?
Let’s be clear upfront: Shakespeare was a genius. His exploration of universal human themes – ambition, love, jealousy, power, betrayal – remains astonishingly profound. The sheer volume of phrases he coined that we still use unconsciously (“break the ice,” “wild-goose chase,” “heart of gold”) is testament to his impact on the English language itself. His work offers incredible historical insight and unparalleled poetic craftsmanship. However, the question isn’t about Shakespeare’s inherent value in the abstract; it’s about his role, often a dominant and mandatory one, within the specific context of contemporary education. Does this centuries-old playwright, writing in an archaic form of English, serve today’s students best as a cornerstone of literary study?
The Relevance Gap: A Language Lost in Time?
The most immediate hurdle is the language itself. Early Modern English presents a significant barrier. For students still mastering contemporary grammar and expanding their vocabulary, Shakespearean syntax, obsolete words (“anon,” “thou,” “hither”), and complex metaphors can feel like deciphering an alien code. Valuable classroom time that could be spent discussing complex themes and character motivations is often swallowed by basic translation exercises: “What does this line actually mean?” This process can drain the life out of the drama, turning vibrant plays into frustrating linguistic puzzles. The inherent beauty and power of the text get lost in the struggle just to comprehend the literal meaning. How can we expect students to engage deeply with the existential crises in Hamlet or the biting social commentary in King Lear when they’re tripping over every third word?
Accessibility vs. Exclusivity: Who Does This Tradition Serve?
The difficulty of the language inherently creates an accessibility issue. Students who enter the classroom with stronger language skills, perhaps from more privileged backgrounds with greater exposure to complex texts, naturally navigate Shakespeare more easily. This can inadvertently widen the achievement gap. Students struggling with English, those for whom English is an additional language, or those without extensive literary exposure at home, face a disproportionately steep climb. What message does this send? That literature, and by extension, intellectual engagement, belongs only to those who can master its archaic gatekeeping language? This isn’t about “dumbing down”; it’s about removing unnecessary barriers so that the ideas within literature become the focus, not the linguistic gymnastics required to reach them. Does clinging to Shakespeare inadvertently reinforce an elitist view of literature?
The Opportunity Cost: What Aren’t We Reading?
Perhaps the most significant argument is one of opportunity cost. School years are finite; classroom hours dedicated to literature are precious and limited. Spending weeks, sometimes months, dissecting a single Shakespearean play means sacrificing time that could be spent exploring the vast, vibrant landscape of modern and diverse literature.
Where are the Contemporary Voices? Students deserve to see their world reflected in what they read. Where are the powerful novels tackling current issues like digital identity, climate anxiety, or evolving social justice movements? Where are the plays by living playwrights exploring modern relationships, conflicts, and triumphs in language students instantly recognize?
Where is the Global Perspective? The literary world is immense. Insisting on Shakespeare’s primacy often crowds out translated works offering crucial perspectives from different cultures, histories, and experiences. Why prioritize Elizabethan England over voices from Africa, Asia, Latin America, or Indigenous communities?
Where are the Diverse Authors? The literary canon taught in schools has historically been narrow. Prioritizing Shakespeare perpetuates a focus on the work of white European men. Students need to read brilliant authors of color, women, LGBTQ+ writers, and authors from varied socioeconomic backgrounds whose experiences and narratives offer essential, often overlooked, insights into the human condition. Reading widely fosters empathy and critical thinking about a diverse world – skills arguably more crucial today than mastering iambic pentameter.
Beyond Outright Removal: Finding a New Balance
The call to “stop being taught Shakespeare” isn’t necessarily about banishing the Bard entirely from every syllabus. It’s a call to critically re-evaluate his position and prominence. Perhaps:
1. Elective, Not Mandatory: Shift Shakespeare to advanced or specialized literature electives where students genuinely interested in historical literature or linguistics can delve deep without imposing the burden universally.
2. Contextual Study: If studied, place Shakespeare firmly within his historical context – as one influential playwright among others of his era (Marlowe, Jonson), examining his work as a product of its time, not an untouchable monument. Compare themes to modern adaptations or works tackling similar ideas.
3. Focus on Performance: Shakespeare wrote plays, not textbooks. Prioritizing watching skilled performances (live or filmed) over line-by-line textual dissection can make the language and drama far more accessible and engaging. The plays come alive on stage.
4. Bridge with Modernity: Use Shakespeare as a starting point, not the destination. Explore modern adaptations (films, novels, plays, even graphic novels inspired by his plots) to show the enduring themes while demonstrating how storytelling evolves.
Towards a Truly Diverse Literary Canon
The ultimate goal of literature education shouldn’t be to create mini-Shakespeare scholars. It should be to ignite a lifelong passion for reading, equip students with critical analysis skills, foster deep empathy, and provide windows into diverse human experiences – past and present. By insisting on Shakespeare’s central, often compulsory place, we risk alienating students, reinforcing outdated hierarchies, and most importantly, missing the incredible opportunity to introduce them to the wealth of powerful, relevant, and transformative literature being written right now in the language they speak.
We honor Shakespeare not by rigidly preserving his mandatory place on every syllabus, but by acknowledging his contribution while confidently making space for the multitude of voices that reflect the complex, diverse world our students actually inhabit. It’s time to broaden the horizon, diversify the reading lists, and ensure the literature classroom becomes a truly welcoming and relevant space for every student. The future of engaged readers depends on it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Beyond the Bard: Why It’s Time to Shift Focus from Shakespeare in Our Classrooms