General Fund Investing: What’s Actually Normal? (And What Isn’t)
Ever found yourself scratching your head, wondering, “Does anyone really know what’s normal in general fund investing?” You’re definitely not alone. The term “general fund” sounds broad, maybe even a bit vague, and that can make it confusing to figure out what standard practices look like. Whether you’re involved with a non-profit, sit on a board, manage institutional assets, or are just deeply curious, understanding the norms in this space is crucial for making informed decisions.
So, What Exactly Is a General Fund?
Let’s clear the fog first. Unlike funds dedicated to a specific purpose (like a building fund or a scholarship endowment), a general fund is essentially the core operating pool of money for an organization. Think of it as the central checking account. Its purpose is broad: supporting the day-to-day functions, covering operational expenses, and acting as a reservoir for readily available cash. For example:
Universities/Colleges: Funding faculty salaries, administration, campus maintenance, utilities.
Non-Profits: Covering program costs, staff salaries, rent, marketing, and overhead.
Municipalities/Governments: Paying for public services like police, fire, roads, and general administration.
Foundations: Supporting grant-making operations and core administrative functions.
Because it’s the lifeblood of operations, the goals for investing a general fund are distinct. Liquidity (easy access to cash without big losses) and capital preservation (not losing the principal amount) are paramount. Generating high returns takes a backseat to ensuring the money is reliably available when needed to pay bills and keep the lights on.
What Does “Normal” Investing Look Like for General Funds?
While every organization’s specific needs and risk tolerance vary, several common themes and practices define the “normal” landscape:
1. Conservative Asset Allocation: This is the bedrock. You won’t typically see a general fund heavily allocated to volatile stocks or speculative assets. The norm leans heavily towards:
Cash & Cash Equivalents: Money market funds, Treasury bills, short-term certificates of deposit (CDs). These offer maximum liquidity and safety.
Short-to-Intermediate Term Bonds: High-quality government bonds (US Treasuries, Agencies) and highly-rated corporate bonds provide slightly higher yields than cash while still maintaining relatively low risk and decent liquidity. The emphasis is on the shorter end of the maturity spectrum to minimize interest rate risk.
Avoiding the Extremes: Significant allocations to equities (stocks), long-term bonds (high interest rate sensitivity), commodities, or highly illiquid assets like private equity or real estate are generally not considered normal for the core portion of a general fund designated for near-term needs.
2. Diversification (Within Safety): Even within conservative assets, spreading the money around is normal. This doesn’t mean chasing exotic investments, but rather not putting all the cash in one bank or buying bonds from only one issuer. Using multiple money market funds or buying a basket of short-term bonds from different entities is standard practice to mitigate issuer-specific risk.
3. Focus on Liquidity Tiers: Savvy managers often segment the general fund based on when cash is needed:
Operational Cash (0-30 days): Parked almost entirely in cash, bank accounts, and overnight instruments for immediate access.
Reserve Cash (1-12 months): Allocated to very short-term bonds or money market funds, accessible with minimal notice and minimal price fluctuation risk.
Strategic Reserves (>1 year): May include a small allocation to slightly longer-term bonds or other low-risk, income-generating assets to capture slightly higher yields, but only for portions not needed imminently. The key is matching the investment’s liquidity profile to the expected cash outflow timing.
4. Professional Management & Oversight: It’s absolutely normal (and highly recommended) for organizations to have clear investment policies and professional oversight. This often involves:
An Investment Policy Statement (IPS): A formal document outlining the fund’s objectives, risk tolerance, allowable asset classes, benchmarks, and responsibilities. Having an IPS is standard practice.
Investment Committee: A group (often including board members, finance staff, and sometimes external experts) responsible for setting policy, selecting managers, and monitoring performance.
Using External Managers/Custodians: Especially for larger funds, it’s common to hire professional investment managers specializing in short-term, conservative portfolios and use third-party custodians to hold the assets securely.
5. Performance Expectations: Steady as She Goes: Don’t expect general fund investments to shoot the lights out. Normal performance is measured against benchmarks like the 90-day Treasury Bill rate, the ICE BofA 1-3 Year US Treasury Index, or a simple money market fund index. Outperforming these by a small margin consistently is good; trying to match the stock market is unrealistic and inappropriate. Stability and meeting liquidity needs are the true measures of success.
Common Pitfalls & What’s Not Normal
Understanding norms also means recognizing missteps:
Reaching for Yield: Investing in longer-term bonds, lower-credit-quality bonds (“junk bonds”), or even stocks purely to boost returns is dangerous for a general fund. The risk of loss when cash is needed is too high.
Liquidity Mismatches: Locking up money needed soon in illiquid investments is a recipe for disaster (think needing to sell a long-term bond at a loss because a bill is due).
Lack of Policy or Oversight: “Winging it” or having one person control everything without checks and balances is risky and falls outside normal prudent practices.
Ignoring Fees: High management fees on conservative portfolios can eat up a significant portion of the meager returns. Scrutinizing costs is essential.
Confusing it with an Endowment: Endowments have very long time horizons and can tolerate significant volatility for higher returns. General funds do not. Treating them the same is a major error.
So, Does Anyone Really Know? Putting it Together
Yes, there are established norms in general fund investing. The core principle is prudent stewardship focused on safety and liquidity. The “normal” portfolio is conservative, dominated by cash and short-term high-quality bonds, carefully diversified, structured around liquidity needs, and managed with clear policies and professional oversight. Performance expectations are grounded in stability, not high growth.
While specific allocations vary based on an organization’s size, cash flow patterns, and unique circumstances, straying too far from these conservative foundations – particularly by taking undue risk in pursuit of higher returns – is generally seen as outside the norm and potentially irresponsible for a fund that underpins essential operations.
The Bottom Line: “Normal” in general fund investing isn’t about maximizing returns; it’s about reliably preserving capital and ensuring money is available exactly when it’s needed. It’s about disciplined, boring, and utterly essential financial management. Understanding and adhering to these norms provides stability and allows organizations to focus on their core mission without worrying about their financial foundation crumbling. If your organization’s general fund strategy feels wildly different or overly aggressive, it might be time to ask, “Is this really normal, and more importantly, is it prudent?”
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » General Fund Investing: What’s Actually Normal