The Letter I Couldn’t Not Send: Why I Took My Information Literacy Fight to Congress (And You Might Consider It Too)
So, I did it. I finally sat down, grabbed my slightly-chewed pen and a notebook already stained with coffee rings, and wrote a letter to my representatives in Congress. The topic? Something that keeps me up at night, something I believe is fundamental to our future, yet feels dangerously overlooked: Information Literacy education.
It wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment rant. It was a culmination. A culmination of watching misinformation spread like wildfire online during crucial elections. A culmination of seeing friends and family share dubious health claims, presented as fact. A culmination of realizing my own kids, digital natives though they are, weren’t instinctively equipped to navigate the complex, often manipulative, information ecosystem they inhabit daily. School taught them algebra and the periodic table, but where was the critical toolkit for dissecting a viral meme, spotting bias in a news article, or understanding the algorithms shaping their feeds?
The Spark That Lit the Fuse
It hit particularly hard during a conversation with my teenager about a controversial current event. They were passionately arguing a point based entirely on a single, emotionally charged video shared within a closed social media group. When I gently asked about the source, the context, or potential counter-evidence, I was met with a shrug. “It looked real,” they said. And honestly? I couldn’t blame them. We haven’t systematically taught them how to determine if something “looking real” actually is real.
That was the moment. The moment I realized hoping schools would magically prioritize this wasn’t enough. Waiting for social media platforms to suddenly become bastions of truth and transparency felt naive. This felt bigger. This felt like it needed a foundational shift, one supported by policy and resources. And that meant speaking up, directly, to the people elected to shape our nation’s priorities.
What My Letter Actually Said (And Why)
My letter wasn’t a novel, but I tried to make it clear, concise, and compelling. Here’s the gist:
1. The Stakes Are Sky-High: I opened by framing information literacy not as a “nice-to-have” tech skill, but as an absolute necessity for a functioning democracy, public health, and individual well-being. How can citizens make informed choices about leaders, policies, or even their own healthcare if they lack the skills to evaluate the information flooding them? I mentioned the tangible costs of misinformation – erosion of trust, polarization, even real-world harm during crises like the pandemic.
2. The Gap is Glaring: I pointed out the disconnect. Our world runs on information, yet formal education hasn’t kept pace. While many dedicated teachers want to incorporate these skills, they often lack the time, training, standardized curriculum, or resources. It’s treated as an add-on, not a core competency as vital as reading or math. I referenced studies (like the Stanford History Education Group’s findings on students’ difficulty evaluating online sources) to underscore the problem isn’t anecdotal.
3. Beyond “Just Google It”: I emphasized that information literacy isn’t just about finding facts. It’s about:
Critical Evaluation: Assessing sources for credibility, authority, bias, and purpose.
Understanding Production: Recognizing how information is created (journalism, advertising, advocacy, AI generation?) and disseminated (algorithms, echo chambers).
Ethical Engagement: Understanding copyright, plagiarism, and responsible sharing.
Synthesis & Creation: Using information ethically and effectively to build knowledge and communicate clearly.
4. A Call for Concrete Action: This wasn’t just venting; it was asking for specific policy moves:
Funding: Dedicated federal funding streams to support states and districts in developing, implementing, and scaling comprehensive K-12 information literacy curricula. This includes resources for teacher training and up-to-date materials.
Curriculum Integration: Encouraging (or even mandating) the integration of robust information literacy standards into core subjects across all grade levels – not confined to a single “digital citizenship” module in middle school.
Supporting Educators: Providing professional development opportunities and practical resources for teachers who are on the front lines.
Research & Best Practices: Funding research into effective pedagogical approaches for information literacy and promoting the sharing of best practices nationwide.
5. It’s Non-Partisan: I made a point to stress that the ability to discern truth from falsehood, to think critically about information, should be a universal value, not a political football. It benefits everyone, regardless of affiliation.
Why Bother Writing? Does it Even Matter?
Honestly? I wrestled with this. In an age of cynicism, writing a letter can feel like shouting into the void. But here’s why I pushed past that feeling:
Volume Matters: Congressional offices do track constituent contacts. While one letter might not rewrite policy, hundreds or thousands on the same issue get noticed. It signals that real people, voters, care deeply about this.
Putting it on the Radar: Many legislators might simply not be aware of the profound impact of the information literacy gap or see it as a priority. Personal stories make abstract problems concrete. My letter aimed to connect the dots between policy and the lived experience of my family and community.
Building Momentum: Advocacy starts somewhere. If even a few letters spark a conversation within a congressional office, or lead to a staffer researching the issue further, that’s progress. It contributes to a growing movement recognizing this need.
Personal Empowerment: Writing the letter forced me to clarify my own thoughts, gather evidence, and articulate a solution. It felt like taking tangible action, however small, against a feeling of helplessness. It shifted me from passive concern to active citizenship.
What Happens Next? (And What You Can Do)
Will my letter single-handedly revolutionize education policy? Unlikely. But I’m hopeful it adds one more voice to a crucial chorus. I’ve sent follow-up emails and plan to gently inquire about it during future town halls or constituent meetings. Advocacy is often a marathon, not a sprint.
So, what are your thoughts?
Does the state of information literacy concern you? Have you witnessed its impact – positive or negative – in your own life, family, or community? Do you think urging our elected officials to prioritize this in education policy is worthwhile?
Maybe you’ve felt that same nagging urgency I did. Maybe you’ve also wondered if speaking up makes a difference. My experience? Writing that letter wasn’t just about what I sent to Congress; it clarified my own commitment to this cause. It made me realize we can’t afford to be silent spectators in the information age. The skills to navigate it aren’t optional extras; they’re foundational for our collective future.
The question isn’t just “What are your thoughts?” It’s perhaps, “Are you ready to share yours – maybe even put them in a letter too?” Our democracy, our communities, and our kids’ futures might just depend on enough of us deciding the answer is “Yes.”
What’s one step you could take to champion information literacy today?
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Letter I Couldn’t Not Send: Why I Took My Information Literacy Fight to Congress (And You Might Consider It Too)