That Time My Psych Class Voted on Fries vs. Salad: And Why We Don’t Need the Guillotine
Picture this: a standard Tuesday morning in my university psychology class. The air hums with the low energy of caffeinated students trying to seem alert. Our professor, known for his unconventional methods, throws a curveball: “Alright, quick show of hands. Who genuinely prefers the taste of fast food burgers and fries over, say, a thoughtfully prepared salad?”
Hands shot up. More than half the class, myself reluctantly included. A ripple of guilty laughter went through the room. Someone near the back muttered, half-joking, half-mournful, “Well, judging by that vote… do we all deserve to be publicly executed?”
It was dark humor, born from the shared, slightly uncomfortable knowledge that we were actively choosing something we knew wasn’t great for us. The professor chuckled, but then leaned in, eyes sharp. “An interesting question,” he said, “but perhaps not the most psychologically productive one. Let’s talk about why we do it instead of jumping straight to medieval punishments.”
That moment stuck with me. That visceral blend of guilt, defiance, and the undeniable pull of salty, greasy satisfaction highlighted something fundamental about human psychology: cognitive dissonance.
The Fast Food Vote: More Than Just Cravings
On the surface, voting for fast food might seem simple. It’s convenient. It’s engineered to be deliciously addictive, hitting our evolutionary sweet spots for fat, salt, and sugar – things once scarce but vital for survival. It’s affordable (often, though not always). It’s consistently familiar. These are powerful, practical motivators.
But beneath the surface, that vote represented a clash. We sat in a class studying the brain, behavior, nutrition’s impact on mental health, and the pitfalls of instant gratification. We knew the long-term health risks associated with frequent fast food consumption: obesity, heart disease, diabetes, even links to depression. Yet, our hands went up. Why?
This is cognitive dissonance in its purest form. It’s the deeply uncomfortable tension we feel when our actions contradict our beliefs or knowledge. We hold two conflicting thoughts simultaneously:
1. “I know eating this frequently is bad for my health and long-term goals.”
2. “I really, really want this cheeseburger and fries right now.”
The human mind hates this dissonance. It craves consistency. So, we have to resolve it somehow. That’s where things get fascinating, and where the “execution” quip reveals our inner struggle.
The Mental Gymnastics of Guilty Pleasures
We don’t resolve this dissonance by suddenly developing superhuman willpower and never craving fries again (if only!). Instead, we often employ subtle, sometimes subconscious, mental strategies to ease the tension:
1. Minimizing the Risk: “Eh, one burger won’t kill me.” “I walked to class today, that balances it out.” We downplay the negative consequences of our choice to make it seem less significant compared to our knowledge.
2. Justifying the Craving: “I’ve had such a stressful week; I deserve this.” “I need the calories for this late-night study session.” We attach logical (or emotional) reasons to our choice, making it feel necessary or earned.
3. Selective Focus: We might actively avoid reading articles about the downsides of fast food while in line at the drive-thru. Or, we focus intensely on the immediate pleasure (“This tastes amazing!”) while pushing thoughts of long-term health to the background.
4. Changing the Belief (Slightly): “Well, they do have some salad options now…” or “Maybe the science isn’t that settled on saturated fats.” We might subtly tweak our knowledge or beliefs to better align with our desired action.
5. Bandwagon Effect: Seeing so many hands go up in class? That provides powerful social justification. “Everyone else is doing it, it can’t be that bad.” Shared guilt feels less potent than individual guilt.
These aren’t malicious lies; they’re psychological coping mechanisms. They help us navigate the gap between our aspirations (to be healthy, informed individuals) and our reality (being tired, stressed humans susceptible to engineered deliciousness).
From Execution to Understanding: A Healthier Approach
So, does choosing a Big Mac over a quinoa bowl warrant public execution? Obviously not. The hyperbolic question itself highlights the excessive guilt we often attach to these choices. Guilt, while sometimes a motivator, is often counterproductive. It feeds the cycle of restriction, craving, indulgence, and then more guilt.
A more psychologically sound approach, the one our professor nudged us towards, involves self-compassion and understanding:
1. Acknowledge the Dissonance: Recognize why you feel that twinge of guilt when you opt for fast food. It’s a sign that you possess the knowledge and care about your well-being – that’s a good thing! Don’t ignore it, but don’t let it paralyze you with shame either.
2. Understand the “Why”: Instead of just labeling it “weakness,” explore your triggers. Are you stressed? Exhausted? Short on time? Socializing? Understanding the context helps you find better solutions. Maybe it’s meal prepping on Sundays, keeping healthy snacks handy, or recognizing you need a proper break, not just fries.
3. Focus on Patterns, Not Perfection: One fast food meal isn’t a character flaw or a health catastrophe. What matters is the overall pattern. Aiming for “mostly healthy” is far more sustainable and realistic than demanding perfection, which often leads to the “screw it” binge mentality.
4. Make Conscious Adjustments: You don’t have to swear off fast food forever. Could you swap the fries for apple slices? Choose grilled over fried? Get a smaller portion? Drink water instead of soda? Small, manageable choices reduce the health impact and can lessen the dissonance.
5. Practice Self-Compassion: Talk to yourself like you would a friend who made the same choice. “Okay, you grabbed fast food because it was a crazy day. It happens. What can you do for dinner to feel nourished?” Beating yourself up only increases stress, which often leads back to… comfort food.
The Takeaway: We’re Human, Not Machines
The vote in my psychology class wasn’t a referendum on our moral worth or a death sentence. It was a snapshot of the messy, contradictory, and fascinating reality of being human. We possess incredible knowledge and lofty goals, yet we are also biological creatures wired for certain pleasures, navigating complex lives with limited time and energy.
Cognitive dissonance isn’t a sign of failure; it’s a sign you’re paying attention. The key isn’t to eliminate every unhealthy craving through sheer will (an impossible task) or to drown in guilt. The key is understanding the psychological forces at play – the cravings, the justifications, the social pressures, and the discomfort of dissonance itself. With that understanding comes the power to make more conscious choices, reduce unnecessary guilt, and find a balance that nourishes both body and mind without requiring the guillotine. After all, navigating the gap between knowing better and doing better is the ongoing project of being human.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » That Time My Psych Class Voted on Fries vs