The Shameful Reality of Adjunct Faculty Pay: Why Exploitation in Higher Education Demands Action
Imagine working for a Fortune 500 company where the CEO earns $3 million annually while entry-level employees qualify for food stamps. Outrageous, right? Yet this imbalance mirrors the reality of higher education, where adjunct professors—who teach the majority of college classes—earn poverty-level wages while university administrators and football coaches pull in six- or seven-figure salaries. The system isn’t just broken; it’s morally indefensible.
Who Are Adjunct Faculty—and Why Does Their Pay Matter?
Adjuncts are part-time, temporary instructors hired by colleges to teach courses, often semester-to-semission. They hold advanced degrees, publish research, and mentor students, yet they’re treated like disposable labor. According to the American Association of University Professors, the average adjunct earns between $20,000 and $25,000 annually—without benefits like health insurance or retirement plans. To survive, many juggle multiple jobs, teach at several institutions simultaneously, or rely on public assistance.
Take Maria, a Ph.D. holder in literature who teaches four classes across two universities. Her monthly paycheck: $2,400 before taxes. After rent and student loans, she’s left with $200 for groceries, utilities, and emergencies. “I’ve stopped going to the doctor,” she says. “My car broke down last year, and I still can’t afford to fix it.” Stories like Maria’s aren’t outliers—they’re the norm in a system that prioritizes budget cuts over human dignity.
The Ripple Effects of Poverty Wages
Low pay doesn’t just hurt adjuncts—it corrodes the entire educational ecosystem. Overworked and financially strained instructors have less time to prep engaging lessons, meet with students, or grade assignments thoughtfully. One study found that 80% of adjuncts work at more than one institution, leaving little bandwidth for mentorship or office hours. Students suffer when their professors are stretched too thin, especially first-generation or marginalized learners who rely on faculty support to navigate college.
There’s also a long-term brain drain. Talented scholars leave academia for stable jobs, reducing the pool of experienced educators. Others stay but grow disillusioned. “I love teaching, but I’ve thought about quitting every semester for the past decade,” says James, a history adjunct. “How can I encourage students to value education when the system treats educators as expendable?”
Why Do Universities Get Away With This?
Colleges argue that tight budgets force them to rely on cheap labor. But this excuse crumbles under scrutiny. Administrative bloat—not faculty salaries—drives up costs. From 1975 to 2018, full-time administrator positions grew by 164%, while tenure-track faculty roles increased by just 23%. Meanwhile, lavish spending on sports programs, vanity construction projects, and six-figure salaries for deans and presidents continues. The president of the University of Michigan, for example, earns nearly $1 million annually—enough to triple the pay of 50 adjuncts.
Adjuncts also lack bargaining power. Without job security or union representation (though this is changing in some regions), they’re easily replaced. Universities exploit this precarity, creating a race to the bottom where instructors compete for crumbs.
Pathways to Change: What Needs to Happen
1. Unionization and Collective Action
Adjuncts at institutions like Chicago State University and Georgetown have successfully unionized, winning better pay and benefits. Collective bargaining forces schools to redistribute resources. Supporting union drives and cross-campus solidarity campaigns is critical.
2. State and Federal Legislation
Lawmakers could cap the percentage of courses taught by adjuncts or tie public funding to fair labor practices. In 2021, California passed a law requiring community colleges to dedicate 75% of instruction to full-time faculty—a model other states could adopt.
3. Public Pressure and Accountability
Students, parents, and alumni can demand transparency about how tuition dollars are spent. Social media campaigns and petitions have already shamed some schools into raising adjunct pay. For example, after public outcry, New York University increased minimum per-course pay for adjuncts from $4,500 to $9,000.
4. Rethinking Institutional Priorities
Universities must slash administrative waste and reinvest in their core mission: education. This means cutting redundant administrative roles, reducing reliance on adjunct labor, and redirecting funds toward fair faculty compensation.
A Call to Conscience
Paying poverty wages to highly educated professionals isn’t just unethical—it’s a betrayal of higher education’s purpose. Colleges claim to champion equity and critical thinking, yet they perpetuate a caste system where adjuncts are second-class citizens.
“This isn’t about charity; it’s about justice,” says Dr. Linda Banks, a labor organizer and former adjunct. “If we value education, we must value educators.” Every student who benefits from a professor’s guidance, every parent who trusts a university to prepare their child for the future, and every taxpayer funding public institutions should demand better.
The solution isn’t complicated. It’s about choosing people over profits, dignity over austerity. Until then, the exploitation of adjunct faculty remains a stain on the soul of higher education—one we can no longer ignore.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The Shameful Reality of Adjunct Faculty Pay: Why Exploitation in Higher Education Demands Action