Across the United States, school board meetings have transformed from sleepy local governance sessions into ideological battlegrounds. Debates over mask mandates, critical race theory, and book bans now dominate discussions, but one issue has emerged as a recurring flashpoint: LGBTQ+ rights in education. In this charged environment, a growing wave of LGBTQ+ candidates is challenging traditional political norms by running for school board seats—not just to advocate for inclusive policies, but to protect the fundamental rights of students and educators.
Why School Boards Became Ground Zero
Local school boards—traditionally nonpartisan positions focused on budgets and curriculum standards—suddenly found themselves in the national spotlight following pandemic-era clashes over public health measures. Conservative advocacy groups seized the moment to expand their focus, pushing for policies that would ban discussions of gender identity, remove LGBTQ+-affirming books from libraries, and restrict transgender students’ access to sports teams or restrooms. This created an urgent need for leaders willing to defend inclusive education, and LGBTQ+ community members began stepping forward in unprecedented numbers.
For many candidates, the decision to run is deeply personal. Take Jessica Smith (name changed for privacy), a transgender parent in Florida: “When I heard board members arguing that picture books with same-sex parents were ‘sexualizing children,’ I realized people making these decisions had never met a family like mine.” Like Smith, queer candidates often emphasize their lived experience as both a qualification and a motivator. They’re not just debating policy abstracts; they’re fighting for their children’s right to see their families reflected in classroom stories or their own ability to exist safely at school events.
The Backlash Playbook
Campaigning as an openly LGBTQ+ candidate in this climate comes with unique challenges. Opponents frequently weaponize misinformation, conflating support for LGBTQ+ students with broader culture war talking points. In Virginia’s 2023 elections, one candidate faced flyers falsely claiming they wanted to “teach kindergarteners about graphic sex acts”—a distortion of their actual platform advocating age-appropriate LGBTQ+ history lessons. Social media amplifies these attacks, with viral posts portraying queer candidates as “groomers” or threats to parental rights.
Physical safety has also become a concern. Several candidates interviewed reported needing security at campaign events after receiving violent threats. “I knew running would make me a target,” says Marco Chavez, a gay school board member in Texas, “but I didn’t expect people to follow me home from the grocery store to scream about ‘protecting kids.’” Despite these risks, many argue visibility is nonnegotiable. “If we back down now,” Chavez adds, “it tells bullies their tactics work.”
Winning Strategies in Red and Purple Districts
Remarkably, LGBTQ+ candidates are scoring victories even in conservative-leaning areas by focusing on universal education issues while calmly addressing misinformation. In Ohio’s 2022 elections, biomedical researcher Dr. Erica Crawley won a swing district seat by emphasizing her background in child development and data-driven approach to pandemic recovery. Only when pressed did she discuss being bisexual—a detail she framed as irrelevant to her qualifications but critical to understanding her commitment to all students feeling valued.
Successful campaigns often involve coalition-building with unexpected allies. In rural Tennessee, a transgender candidate partnered with agricultural leaders to discuss vocational training programs, later revealing how anti-LGBTQ+ policies could harm workforce development. Others highlight bipartisan concerns like school safety or teacher retention. “Voters care most about whether their kids have qualified teachers and safe classrooms,” explains Colorado board member Shay Johnson, a lesbian former teacher. “My identity becomes part of that conversation only when others try to make it a distraction.”
The Ripple Effects of Representation
Winning the seat is just the beginning. LGBTQ+ board members describe using their positions to implement concrete changes: updating anti-bullying policies to include gender identity protections, approving mental health resources tailored to queer youth, and reviewing library book challenges through a lens of inclusion. Perhaps more importantly, their presence shifts internal dynamics. “Before I was elected, some board members referred to transgender students as ‘those kids’ during discussions,” says a nonbinary board member in Michigan. “Now they’re asking, ‘How will this impact our trans students specifically?’ That’s progress.”
Students themselves are taking notice. In districts with openly LGBTQ+ leaders, GSA (Gender-Sexuality Alliance) clubs report increased membership, and teachers feel empowered to display rainbow safe space stickers. A high school junior in Pennsylvania put it simply: “Seeing Mr. Thompson at board meetings—knowing he’s gay and in charge—makes me feel like I could actually be open about myself here.”
The Long Game
While recent elections show promising trends, activists caution that sustained progress requires more than individual victories. Organizations like the LGBTQ+ Victory Fund now offer specialized training for school board candidates, covering everything from navigating hostile town halls to interpreting education budgets. Meanwhile, groups like Moms for Liberty continue pouring resources into opposing inclusive policies, ensuring contentious debates will persist.
For candidates like South Carolina’s Rebecca Stowe, a bisexual mother of four, the fight transcends politics. “This isn’t about left vs. right,” she says. “It’s about whether we create schools where kids learn to respect differences or ones where certain students get erased. Every time I swear in a new student council member or shake a kindergartener’s hand at a school play, I’m reminded why this work matters.”
As America’s culture wars continue reshaping education, LGBTQ+ school board members aren’t just defending their right to exist—they’re modeling how communities can navigate divisive issues through participation rather than polarization. Their campaigns, often underfunded and overlooked by national media, represent democracy at its most grassroots: neighbors showing up to protect neighbors, one school district at a time.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Across the United States, school board meetings have transformed from sleepy local governance sessions into ideological battlegrounds