When Oklahoma recently announced that out-of-state teachers from California and New York must pass a 34-question exam designed by PragerU, the decision sparked immediate debate. The “America First” assessment, unveiled in full this week, aims to evaluate educators’ understanding of foundational American principles, historical context, and civic values. But critics argue the test reflects ideological priorities rather than academic standards. Let’s unpack what’s inside this controversial exam and why it’s generating national attention.
PragerU, a media nonprofit known for its conservative-leaning educational videos, describes its mission as promoting “Judeo-Christian values” and a “patriotic understanding of American history.” While not an accredited university, the organization has gained traction in recent years through partnerships with state education departments and school boards. Oklahoma’s adoption of its test marks a significant escalation in efforts to reshape how U.S. history and civics are taught—particularly in states with differing political climates.
What’s on the Test?
The exam includes questions spanning colonial history, constitutional principles, and cultural milestones. One sample question asks teachers to identify the primary purpose of the Declaration of Independence, emphasizing its role in asserting natural rights rather than merely dissolving ties with Britain. Another probes the intent behind the First Amendment, focusing on protections for religious expression.
Notably, several questions tie directly to PragerU’s stated values. For instance, educators are asked to explain how the “Judeo-Christian ethic” influenced the Founding Fathers’ views on governance. A section on 20th-century history highlights America’s Cold War opposition to communism, framing it as a defense of “individual liberty against collectivist ideologies.” Critics point out that topics like slavery, Native American displacement, and civil rights movements appear less prominently compared to themes of national exceptionalism.
Why Target Out-of-State Teachers?
Oklahoma’s policy applies specifically to educators licensed in California or New York seeking to work in the state. Supporters argue this ensures incoming teachers align with Oklahoma’s educational priorities. “We want instructors who celebrate America’s heritage, not apologize for it,” said a state education spokesperson. The move follows similar efforts in Florida and Texas, where laws now limit how topics like systemic racism or LGBTQ+ issues are discussed in classrooms.
Opponents, however, see this as political gatekeeping. Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, called the test “a loyalty oath to a particular ideology.” Teachers’ unions in California and New York have condemned the requirement, arguing it undermines professional autonomy and discourages cross-state collaboration.
The Broader Culture War in Classrooms
This controversy mirrors a nationwide clash over educational content. PragerU’s involvement signals a growing trend: private organizations influencing public curricula. The group’s free video resources, which downplay climate change skepticism and critique progressive social movements, are already used in thousands of schools. By designing certification exams, PragerU gains further sway over what’s taught—and what’s omitted—in history and civics courses.
Proponents praise the test for recentering “traditional” narratives. “Too many textbooks portray America as inherently flawed,” said Dennis Prager, co-founder of PragerU. “This exam ensures educators teach our story accurately—as a force for good.” But historians warn against oversimplification. Dr. Emily Ruiz, a professor of education at Columbia University, notes, “Selectively framing history risks leaving students unprepared to critically engage with complex truths.”
What’s Next?
Oklahoma’s policy takes effect in 2024, though legal challenges are likely. The state’s attorney general has already defended the test as constitutional, citing states’ rights to set licensure standards. Meanwhile, educators in affected states face a dilemma: undergo ideological vetting or lose job opportunities in Oklahoma.
For teachers like Maria Gonzalez, a high school history instructor from Los Angeles considering a move to Tulsa, the test feels divisive. “I shouldn’t have to prove my ‘patriotism’ to teach here,” she said. “My job is to help students think, not recite dogma.”
As red and blue states increasingly adopt conflicting educational mandates, the rift raises deeper questions: Who gets to define America’s story? Can schools balance pride and critique? And what happens when teachers become pawns in a polarized battle over values?
Oklahoma’s experiment may set a precedent—for better or worse. Whether other states follow suit could determine how future generations learn about their nation’s past… and envision its future.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Oklahoma recently announced that out-of-state teachers from California and New York must pass a 34-question exam designed by PragerU, the decision sparked immediate debate