How Federal Policy Shifts Impact Education in the Golden State
When President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) into law in 2017 and proposed subsequent federal budgets, the ripple effects were felt nationwide. But for California—a state with the largest public education system in the U.S.—these policy changes sparked unique challenges and debates. Students, families, and educators across the state grappled with questions about affordability, access, and long-term consequences. Let’s unpack how Trump-era fiscal policies continue to shape the educational landscape in California.
—
Federal Funding Cuts and Higher Education
One of the most immediate concerns for California students was the Trump administration’s proposed budget reductions to key education programs. The White House repeatedly sought to slash funding for federal student aid, including Pell Grants, which help low-income students afford college. While Congress largely rejected these cuts, the uncertainty created anxiety for families relying on these programs.
California’s public universities, which serve over 2 million students across the UC, CSU, and community college systems, rely heavily on federal grants and research funding. Proposed cuts to agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation (NSF) threatened critical research opportunities for graduate students and faculty. For example, UC Berkeley alone received over $700 million in federal research funding in 2019—a lifeline for STEM programs and innovation.
Community colleges, which enroll nearly 40% of California’s undergraduates, faced additional strain. Federal work-study programs, often a financial lifeline for students balancing jobs and coursework, were targeted for reductions. Advocates argued these cuts would disproportionately harm first-generation and low-income students, who make up a significant portion of California’s community college population.
—
The SALT Deduction Cap and Family Finances
The TCJA’s $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions hit California harder than most states. With high state income taxes and soaring property values, many middle-class families saw their federal tax bills rise. For parents saving for college or supporting students already in school, this added financial pressure forced tough choices.
Consider a family in Los Angeles earning $150,000 annually. Under previous tax rules, they might have deducted $20,000 in state and local taxes. Post-TCJA, their taxable income increased by $10,000, potentially costing them thousands more in federal taxes. For families already stretching budgets to cover tuition, housing, or textbooks, this squeeze made college affordability even more daunting.
The SALT cap also indirectly impacted K-12 education. California schools rely heavily on local property taxes, and the TCJA’s disincentive against high property taxes could discourage communities from approving funding measures for schools. This creates a trickle-down effect: underfunded K-12 systems may leave students less prepared for college, exacerbating equity gaps in higher education.
—
Student Loan Repayment and Tax Changes
The TCJA eliminated two provisions that once eased the burden of student debt. First, it revoked the deduction for student loan interest, which allowed borrowers to reduce taxable income by up to $2,500 annually. Second, it ended tax-free employer-sponsored student loan repayment assistance programs—a benefit some companies used to attract talent.
For California graduates, who carry an average of $37,000 in student debt, these changes added stress. With the state’s high cost of living—rents in cities like San Francisco average over $3,000 a month—young professionals already struggle to balance loan payments with basic expenses. The loss of tax breaks made repayment even more punishing.
—
California’s Countermeasures
In response to federal policy shifts, California lawmakers pursued state-level solutions. Governor Gavin Newsom’s 2023 budget allocated record funding for higher education, including tuition-free community college for first-time, full-time students. The state also expanded its Cal Grant program, helping more low-income students attend UC and CSU campuses.
Additionally, California sued the federal government over the SALT deduction cap, arguing it unfairly targeted Democratic-leaning states. While the Supreme Court dismissed the case in 2020, the state continues to explore legislative workarounds, such as allowing local governments to create charitable funds to offset tax liabilities—a move aimed at preserving funding for schools.
—
Long-Term Implications for Equity
The intersection of Trump-era policies and California’s demographics reveals a stark equity challenge. Nearly 60% of California’s K-12 students are Latino, Black, or Asian, and many come from households earning less than $50,000 a year. Reduced federal support risks widening the gap between affluent students—who can rely on family resources—and those depending on public programs.
For example, cuts to federal TRIO programs, which assist low-income and first-generation students in preparing for college, could hinder outreach in underserved areas like the Central Valley or Inland Empire. Similarly, proposed limits on immigration under Trump affected thousands of California students, including DACA recipients, who contribute over $1.2 billion annually to the state’s economy through tuition and taxes.
—
Looking Ahead
While the Biden administration has reversed some Trump-era policies—like restoring the student loan interest deduction through 2025—the legacy of earlier budget and tax decisions lingers. California’s ability to “go it alone” with progressive state policies has softened the blow, but long-term fixes remain uncertain.
Students and families must stay informed about both federal and state policy changes. Advocates emphasize the importance of voting in local elections, where decisions about school funding and tuition rates are made. Meanwhile, universities are exploring creative solutions, such as expanding online degree programs and partnering with employers to offer debt-free education pathways.
In a state where education is often seen as the great equalizer, the stakes couldn’t be higher. As federal and state leaders clash over budgets and taxes, California’s students continue navigating a system where opportunity often depends on policy decisions made far beyond campus borders.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » How Federal Policy Shifts Impact Education in the Golden State